8:35. Test-Bed for Evaluation of Impact of Evil Waveforms on Real Receivers and SQM Performance: C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; W. Vigneau, M3Systems; D. Houzet, ENSEEIHT
8:57. Estimation of ICAO Threat Model Parameters for Operational GPS Satellites: A.M. Mitelman, D.M. Akos, S.P. Pullen, P.K. Enge, Stanford University
9:20. Development of Signal in Space Performance Requirements for GBAS to Support CAT II/III Landing Operations: T. Murphy, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group
9:43. Experimental and Theoretical Results on the LAAS Sigma Overbound: I. Sayim, B. Pervan, Illinois Institute of Technology

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Performance of a Prototype Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) Ground Installation: M. Brenner, P. Kline, R. Reuter, Honeywell Commercial Aviation Products
10:47. GBAS Implementation Challenges: Positive Elevation Angle Multipath and More: G.E. Berz, M. Scaramuzza, Skyguide, Switzerland; A. Geiger, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology; B. Ott, Thales ATM
11:10. Airport Pseudolite Flight Experiment: S. Suga, S. Nagano, H. Tsunoda, K. Odajima, Toshiba Corporation, Japan; N. Fujii, S. Fukushima, S. Saitoh, Electronic Navigation Research Institute
11:33. Pseudolite Implementation for Social Infrastructure and Seamless Indoor/Outdoor Positioning: I. Petrovski, K. Okano, M. Ishii, H. Torimoto, DX Antenna Co.Ltd., Japan; Y. Konishi, R. Shibasaki, Institute of Industrial Sciences, University of Tokyo, Japan

Alternates
1. Co-Locating DGPS and Loran Transmitters: D.B. Wolfe, J.L. Hartline, M.W. Parsons, United States Coast Guard Command and Control Engineering Center; M.E. McKaughan, H.L. McCarter, United States Coast Guard Academy; C.A. Schue, WR Systems, Ltd.
2. GPS Post-Processing for Field Applications - An Innovative, Cost-Effective Method: G. Fucheck, LinksPoint

8:35. GPS Operations on the PCsat Microsatellite: O. Montenbruck, S. Leung, German Space Operations Center, Germany; R. Bruninga, United States Naval Academy
8:57. SAC-C Orbit Reconstruction Using the Experimental GPS/GLONASS Receiver LAGRANGE: S. Casotto, A. Zin, B. Padovan, Universita di Padova, Italy
9:20. Space Applications Algorithms and Initial Simulation Results for the ITT Low-Power Transceiver: S. Draganov, B. Veytsman, L. Haas, ITT Industries
9:43. Multi-Sensor Navigation and Attitude Determination System for Space Applications: M. Mittnacht, E. Gottzein, W. Fichter, M. Hartrampf, A. Konrad, P. Krauss, W. Oesterlin, P. Ruhland, Astrium GmbH, Germany; T. Vogel, Jena Optronik GmbH

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. New Dimension for GEO and GTO AOCS Applications Using GPS and Galileo Measurements: W. Enderle, R. Walker, Y. Feng, W. Kellar, Cooperative Research Centre for Satellite Systems, Australia
10:47. Results from the GPS Flight Experiment on the High Earth Orbit AMSAT-OSCAR 40 Spacecraft: M.C. Moreau, E.P. Davis, J.R. Carpenter, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; G.W. Davis, Emergent Space Technologies; P. Axelrad, University of Colorado at Boulder
11:10. Single Antenna Attitude Determination for FedSat: R.A. Walker, W. Enderle, Cooperative Research Centre for Satellite Systems of Queensland University of Technology, Australia
11:33. Plasma Wave Interferometry Using GPS Positioning and Timing on a Formation of Three Sub-Orbital Payloads: S.P. Powell, E.M. Klatt, P.M. Kintner, Cornell University

8:35. An Indoor Multi-Carrier Multi-Frequency CDMA System with Adaptive Arrays: I.F. Progri, W.R. Michalson, M.C Bromberg, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
8:57. Position Determination Using Hybrid GPS/Cellphone Ranging: N.F. Krasner, G. Marshall, W. Riley, SnapTrack Division, Qualcomm
9:20. A Novel Weak Signal Acquisition Scheme for Assisted GPS: S. Hyun Park, Y. Baek Kim, Navicom Co., Ltd., Korea; D. Jae Cho, S. Jeong Lee, GNSS Technology Research Center, Chungnam National University, Korea; I. Heung Choi, S. Jun Yun, Navicom Co., Ltd., Korea and GNSS Technology Research Center, Chungnam National
9:43. Analysis of GPS Time Transfer Accuracy in GSM and UMTS Networks and Possibilities to Improve Sensitivity: J. Syrjarinne, T. Kinnari, Nokia Mobile Phones, Finland

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Indoor GPS Test Methodology and Indoors Performance Test: L.J. Garin, G. Zhang, W. Innis, J. Henriksen, SiRF Technology Inc.
10:47. Proposed Models and Methodologies for Verification Testing of AGPS-Equipped Cellular Mobile Phones in the Laboratory: P. Boulton, Spirent Communications, UK; R. Klukas, G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada
11:10. Centimeter Accuracy Stand-Alone Indoor Navigation System by Synchronized Pseudolite Constellation: D. Yun, C. Kee, Seoul National University, Korea
11:33. Synchronized Pseudolites - The Key to Indoor Navigation: S. Soderholm, Fastrax Ltd., Finland; T. Jokitalo, Space Systems Finland Ltd.

Alternates
1. Very Efficient High Sensitivity Fully Coherent AGPS Signal Processing with Almost No Assistance Requirements: B. Shayevits, H. Cohen, J. Nir, E. Dochovny, CellGuide, Israel
2. Phase Centers of GPS IIF Modernization L-Band Antenna: C.W. Choi, C.P. Jazmin, Boeing; G.L. Mader, NOAA
3. GAWAIN: A Galileo W-CDMA Integrated Navigation Receiver Prototype: J. Pielmeier, J. Winkel, E. Lohnert, IfEN GmbH, Germany

8:35. GALILEO Is Launched: H. Hilbrecht, European Commission, Belgium
8:57. Galileo´s Proposed Services: L. Dutton, Thales Avionics Limited, UK; W. Forrest, D. Rumens, Thales Air Traffic Management, UK
9:20. Market and Policy Drivers for the Development of Navigation Services in the Galileo Era: J. Styles, B. Jenkins, ESYS plc, UK
9:43. Status of Galileo Frequency and Signal Design: G.W. Hein, J. Godet, J.L. Issler, J.C. Martin, T. Pratt, R. Lucas, The EC Galileo Signal Task Force, Brussels

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Design Criteria for RNSS Signal Emissions: H. Kuhlen, T. Burger, M. Soellner, Astrium, Germany
10:47. GPS and Galileo - Interoperability for Civil Aviation Applications: P. Fyfe, C. Kelley, C. Mosley, I. Jeng, K. Davis, The Boeing Company
11:10. Galileo PRS Explained - An Industrial View: B. Panefieu, Thales Avionics, France; N. Duchenne, Thales ATM; J.F. Bou, Thales Contractorisation & Outsourcing
11:33. An Evaluation of the Military Benefits of the Galileo System: J.M. Hasik, Consultant; M.R. Rip, Michigan State University

Alternates
1. GPS and GALILEO Interoperability and Synergies - First Results of EC´s Galilei Interoperability Study: A. Leonard, H. Blomenhofer, Thales ATM GmbH, Germany
2. Galilean - Developing European GNSS Business and Markets by the Thematic Network Approach: H. Zunker, H. Stich, Euro Telematik AG, Germany; M.L. Mathieu, P. Campagne, France Developpement Conseil, France
3. The Stratolite Concept: Design of a Stratospheric Pseudo-Satellite for Galileo: P. Mulassano, F. Dovis, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; M. Dumville, Nottingham Scientific Ltd., UK

8:35. Leapfrog Navigation System: G.R. Opshaug, Stanford University
8:57. Vehicular Navigation in Urban Canyons Using a High Sensitivity Receiver Augmented with Low Cost Sensors: Y. Lu, G. Lachapelle, R. Klukas, University of Calgary, Canada
9:20. Using Today´s Available Wireless Location Information as a Backup Technology for GPS Positioning: H. Hartinger, Siemens Datatrak Location and Information Systems, Austria; D. Trummer, Insitute of Econometrics, OR and System Theory - University of Technology Vienna
9:43. The Qualcomm/SnapTrack Wireless-Assisted GPS Hybrid Positioning System and Results from Initial Commercial Deployments: Z. Biacs, G. Marshall, M. Moeglein, W. Riley, SnapTrack, A Qualcomm Company

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Mobile Location Applications and Enabling Technologies: S. Pietila, M. Williams, Nokia Mobile Phones, Research and Technology Access, Finland
10:47. Integration of GPS and Dead Reckoning for Real Time Vehicle Performance and Emissions Monitoring: W.Y. Ochieng, D. Briggs, R. Noland, J.H. Park, J. Polak, K. Sheridan, L. Zhao, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK; A. Crookell, R. Evans, Sira Technologies Limited, UK; M. Walker, W. Randolf, Saturn Technologies Limited, UK
11:10. Development, Analysis, and Testing of a Pedestrian Alert System (PAS) Design: C. Rodgers, D. Greenlee, OPTIMUS Corporation; R. Blomberg, Dunlap & Associates
11:33. Intelligent Transportation Systems by Three-Dimensional Geographic Database: S. Anai, ZENRIN Co. Ltd., Japan

Alternates
1. LOCUS (Location of Cellular Users for Emergency Services): W. Lechner, S. Baumann, Telematica e.K., Germany
2. Method and Use of Aggregated GPS and Dead Reckoning Sensor Data for Map Matching: B. Phuyal
3. A GNSS-Based In-Car Odometer for Distance-Based Toll Collection: R.A. Gutteling, R. van de Leijgraaf, O. Tettero

8:35. A GPS C/A Code Tracking Loop Based on Extended Kalman Filter with Multipath Mitigation: G.I. Jee, S. Boo, H. Kim, Konkuk University, South Korea; J. Hong, MicroInfinity
8:57. Reduction of Pseudorange Multipath Errors in Static Positioning: N. Kubo, A. Yasuda, Tokyo University of Mercantile Marine, Japan
9:20. Evaluation, Refinement and Fusion of Software-Based Pseudorange Multipath Mitigation Techniques: R.B. Harris, Applied Research Laboratories, University of Texas at Austin
9:43. Improving Path Separation in a Multipath Environment by Applying Nonlinear Estimation Theory: K. Kaindl, N. Niklasch, ViCon GmbH, Germany

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Using Multicorrelator Receivers for Multipath Parameters Estimation: R. Chaggara, TeSA; C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; E. Chatre, STNA
10:47. Analysis and Generalization of a Dual-Antenna Multipath Mitigation Technique: M.C. Santos, University of New Brunswick, Canada; J.C.F. Farret, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil
11:10. Multipath Mitigation Using Modernized GPS Signals: How Good Can It Get?: L. Weill, California State University, Fullerton
11:33. Self-Aiding in GPS Signal Tracking: Q. Zhengdi, Nokia Corporation, Finland

Alternates
1. Applying Multipath Template Technique to Improve the Real-Time Ionospheric Delay Estimation Accuracy: L.S. Lin, National Chengchi University, Taiwan
2. Rapid Acquisition of GPS C/A Code Employing Adaptive Threshold: M. Waezi, S.M. Safavi, H. Aghaeinia, Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran

2:05. Flight Test Results of GPS/INS Navigation Loop for an Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV): J.H. Kim, S. Sukkarieh, University of Sydney, Australia
2:27. Development of the AGPS/INS Integration System Using the Triple Difference Technique: S.H. Oh, J.W. Kim, S.W. Moon, D.H. Hwang, S.J. Lee, Chungnam National University, South Korea; C.S. Park, Chungbuk National University, South Korea
2:50. Estimation of Alignment Errors in GPS/INS Integration: S. Hong, Y. Shin Chang, S. Ha, M. Hyung Lee, Pusan National University, South Korea
3:13. Multi-Sensors Integration Using Neuron Computing for Navigation Applications: K.W. Chiang, N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. Trunav(TM): A Low-Cost Guidance/Navigation Unit Integrating a SAASM-Based GPS and MEMS IMU in a Deeply Coupled Mechanization: J. Beser, S. Alexander, R. Crane, S. Rounds, J. Wyman, L-3 Communications/Interstate Electronics Corporation; B. Baeder, US Army Aviation and Missile Command
4:23. INS/DGPS/VMS Integration for In-Motion Alignment: T. Numajima, M. Kihara, Y. Kubo, S. Sugimoto, Ritsumeikan University, Japan; T. Seki, Tamagawa Seiki Co.Ltd.
4:45. Fault Detection and Exclusion Using Normalized Solution Separation Methods: R.S.Y. Young, G.A. McGraw, Rockwell Collins
5:07. Integrity Monitoring for Multi-Sensor Integrated Navigation Systems: I. Nikiforov, LM2S, Universite de Technologie de Troyes, France

Alternates
1. Integrated GNSS/INS System Guaranteed Achievable Accuracy Exploration by Robust Minimax Estimate Approach: A. Bobrov, V. Bobrov, C. Neusipin, Italy
2. GPS and Loran-C - A Raw Data-Based Integration Method: W. Lechner, G. Abwerzger, Telematica e.K., Germany

2:05. An Updated Assessment of the GNSS L1 Radio Frequency Interference Environment: R. Erlandson, Rockwell Collins; R. Frazier, FAA
2:27. Monitor, Report & Locate: Tools for Critical Infrastructure Protection: S. Friedman, G. Gerten, D. Irwin, Veridian Engineering
2:50. Multiple GPS RFI Sources in a Small California Harbor: J.R. Clynch, A.A. Parker, R.W. Adler, W.R. Vincent, Naval Postgraduate School; P. McGill, G. Badger, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
3:13. Interference Localisation Trials Using Adaptive Antenna Arrays: M. Trinkle, D. Gray, CSSIP, The University of Adelaide, Australia

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. Simplified Techniques for Analyzing the Effects of Non-White Interference on GPS Receivers: C. Hegarty, M. Tran, The MITRE Corporation
4:23. Determination of C/A Code Self-Interference Using Cross-Correlation Simulations and Receiver Bench Tests: A.J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems; R. Erlandson, G. McGraw, Rockwell Collins; R. Coker, Pythagorean Development, Inc.
4:45. High-Fidelity Model Development for Navigation Warfare Simulation Studies: S.N. Gouldsworthy, P.D. Groves, QinetiQ Ltd, UK; M. Wells, Roke Manor Research Ltd., UK
5:07. Joint Global Positioning System Combat Effectiveness (JGPSCE) Joint Test & Evaluation: R. Peden, JGPSCE JTF

Alternate
1. A Comparison of Measured Jamming Mitigation Performance from Field Tests with Predictions from Hardware-Based CRPA Simulations and Analytic Simulations: C. Behre, F. Ziolkowski, P. Grobert, J. Hvizd, Raytheon Electronic Systems

2:05. The "GPS Navigation Sensor System Approach" (GNSSA) Module: A High Performance GPS Receiver for All Aircraft Precision Approach Applications Including CAT-IIIb: D. Domey, J.C. Lanoue, J. Studenny, CMC Electronics
2:27. SiGe Bi-CMOS Fabrication Promises Major Advantages for Portable GPS Applications: G Haynes, SiGe Semiconductor, UK
2:50. A GPS Radio for Indoor Wireless Communications: P. Paddan, P. Naish, M. Phocas, Parthus Technologies, UK
3:13. Post Processing Algorithms for Translator-Type GPS Receivers: D. Molyneux, A.R. Pratt, Parthus Technologies Ltd., UK

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. Testing of the ICESat BlackJack GPS Receiver Engineering Model: J. Williams, E.G. Lightsey, S. Yoon, R.E. Schutz, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin
4:23. GPS Baseband IP for Car Navigation SOC: W. Ito, A. Kume, K. Mino, AISIN AW Co., Ltd.; Y. Yokoi, M. Hada, T. Kawazoe, Y. Ogasa, M. Shoji, Japan Radio Co., Ltd.; S. Kojima, Y. Okada, T. Oga, K. Koda, Hitachi, Ltd.
4:45. NASA´s GRACE Mission: Augmentation of GPS to Achieve Unprecedented Gravity Field Measurements: C. Dunn, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
5:07. Radiation Test Results of Commersial GPS/GLONASS Receiver: V. Colokolov, S. Filatchenkov, V. Malashin, B. Shebshaevich, Russian Institute of Radionavigation and Time; V. Branets, Rocket Space Corporation Energia

Alternates
1. An Optimized GPS Receiver Architecture for Intellectual Property and System on Chip (SoC) Integration: J. Shewfelt, H. Vyas, M. Chou, SiRF Technology, Inc.
2. Position Reporting Terminal with Network-Assisted GPS for DLP: Y. Yokoi, A. Bandai, A. Okuyama, H. Kida, T. Waki, M. Shoji, Japan Radio Co., Ltd.; A. Mitamura, T.Monma, NTT DoCoMo, Inc.
3. Performance of the Integrated GPS/DARC Receiver Using Real-Time L1 Float Solution: J.U. Park, J.H. Jo, Korea Astronomy Observatory, Korea; S.O. Yim, B.H. Kim, S.C. Bang, Bway Co., Ltd., Korea

2:05. An Analysis of Satellite Integrity Monitoring Improvement for WAAS: J.T. Wu, S. Peck, Raytheon Systems Company
2:27. An Application of Gaussian Overbounding for the WAAS Fault Free Error Analysis: T.R. Schempp, A.L. Rubin, Raytheon Systems Company
2:50. Methods for Improving Phase 1 WAAS LNAV/VNAV Availability in Alaska: D.G. O´Laughlin, E.V. Calle, R.O. Lejeune, M.B. El-Arini, J.P. Fernow, The MITRE Corporation
3:13. GRAS Applications: EGNOS TRAN: N. Gustavson, Swedavia; L. Martineau, Thales Air Traffic Management France; A. Salonico, Telespazio, Italy

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. Comparison of GEO and GPS Orbit Determination via Covariance Analysis: M.S. Grewal, California State University, Fullerton; E. Carolipio, N. Pandya, Raytheon Systems Co.
4:23. A Simple Method of Signal Quality Monitoring for WAAS LNAV/VNAV: P. Shloss, Raytheon Company; E. Phelts, P. Enge, T. Walter, Stanford University
4:45. Practical Considerations for Antenna Range Error Characterization: K.W. Shallberg, J.C. Grabowski, Zeta Associates Incorporated
5:07. An Ionosphere Estimation Algorithm for WAAS Based on Kriging: J. Blanch, Stanford University

2:05. 3-D Positioning Capabilities for GPS Pseudolite Transceiver Arrays: M. Matsuoka, E.A. LeMaster, S.M. Rock, Stanford University
2:27. GPS Corn Maze, A New Satellite Navigation Application: F. Boynton, Navtech GPS Supply
2:50. Multipath Mitigation in Various Environments for Blind Navigation: M.A. Shah, Brunel University, UK
3:13. The Use of Pseudolites to Augment GPS Data for Bridge Deflection Measurements: G. Roberts, X. Meng, A. Dodson, E. Cosser, IESSG, University of Nottingham, UK

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. In-door and Out-door Navigation for the Blind: An Integrated Approach for a New Product: Q. Ladetto, M. May, J. van Seeters, B. Merminod, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
4:23. The ESA SISNeT Technology: Access to the EGNOS Services through Wireless Networks and the Internet: F. Toran-Marti, J. Ventura-Traveset, European Space Agency, France; R. Chen, Finish Geodetic Institute, Finland
4:45. Overlay Video Display of Target Position Utilizing GPS, Compass, and Range Finder Data: M.D. La Rocque
5:07. GPS/INS Instrumentation of a Sport Parachute Jumper: J.M. Strus, E.G. Blackwell, C.A. Gellrich, M.R. Kirkpatrick, J.W. Sinko, SRI International

Alternates
1. GPS at Ground Zero: How GPS Technology Aided the FDNY in the Recovery Efforts at the World Trade Center Disaster Site: S. Potter, LinksPoint
2. A Low Cost DGPS Navigation for Mobile Robots: H. Irie, Yatsushiro National College of Technology, Japan
3. Intelligent Skyscraper Monitoring System Based on GPS and Optical Fibre Sensors: L. Ge, C. Rizos, X. Li, G.D. Peng, University of New South Wales, Australia; Y. Ishikawa, Meteorological Research Institute, Japan

2:05. On Ultrahigh-Precision GPS Positioning and Navigation: D. Kim, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada
2:27. Integrated Use of GPS and EGNOS Carrier Phase Observations for High Precision Kinematic Positioning: K. Sauer, W.Y. Ochieng, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK; H. Secretan, EGNOS Project Office, France
2:50. Radiolocation Using AM Broadcast Signals: Positioning Performance: T.D. Hall, P.N. Misra, MIT Lincoln Laboratory; C.C. Counselman III, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3:13. Development and Testing of an Optimal Cascading Scheme to Resolve Multi-Frequency Carrier Phase Ambiguities: J. Liu, P. Alves, M. Petovello, G. MacGougan, M.E. Cannon, G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. A Fast Ambiguity Resolution Technique for RTK Embedded within a GPS Receiver: Y. Yang, T. Sharpe, R. Hatch, NavCom Technology, Inc.
4:23. The Impact of Unmodelled Multipath on Ambiguity Resolution: P. Joosten, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands; T. Pany, Institute of Geodesy and Navigation, University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich, Germany
4:45. Precise Acceleration Determination from Carrier Phase Measurements: S. Kennedy, University of Calgary, Canada
5:07. Rapid Ambiguity Resolution Using Multipath Spatial Processing for High Accuracy Carrier Phase: A. Brown, K. Stolk, NAVSYS Corporation

Alternates
1. Rapid Mapping with Post-Processed Data from Garmin Handheld Receivers: C.J. Hill, T. Moore, IESSG, The University of Nottingham, UK; M.E. Napier, IT Consultant
2. Attaining Continuous Centimeter Level Positioning on the Freeway in Combination with Error Detection: J.W. Sinko, J.M. Strus, SRI International

8:35. A Formation Flight Experiment Using Differential Carrier Phase for Precise Relative Navigation: W.R. Williamson, M.F. Abdel-Hafez, I. Rhee, J.D. Wolfe, J.L. Speyer, University of California, Los Angeles
8:57. Quantification of GPS Performance for Aviation Applications Including a Comparison with the New SPS Standard: D. Walsh, G. Brodin, M. Daly, CAA Institute of Satellite Navigation, University of Leeds, UK; S. Griffin, M. Denney, Safety Regulation Group, UK Civil Aviation Authority
9:20. Hazardously Misleading Information Analysis for Loran LNAV: B. Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning; P. Enge, T. Walter, S. Lo, L. Boyce, Stanford University; R. Wenzel, Booz Allen Hamilton; K. Carroll, USCG Loran Support Unit; M. Narins, Federal Aviation Administration
9:43. LPV: New, Improved WAAS Instrument Approach: H. Cabler, FAA

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. The Use of Wavelets for Determining Wing Flexure in Airborne GPS Multi-Antenna Attitude Determination Systems: M. Moore, The University of New South Wales, Australia
10:47. A 3-Dimensional Cockpit Display with Traffic and Terrain Information for the Small Aircraft Transportation System: M. Uijt de Haag, J. Rankin, R. Thomas, Ohio University
11:10. Flight Testing of the D8PSK/TDMA Datalink Technology for the Ground-Based Regional Augmentation System: W.S. Ely, G.K. Crosby, K.W. McPherson, J.M. Stewart, Airservices, Australia
11:33. Monitoring Sea Level Heights, Rise/Falling and Azimuth Angles of Flight of Aircrafts on the Basis of On-Board GPS Positioning and Geopotential Model Egm96, Principles of Crew Warning of Artificial and Natural Obstacles: V. Vatrt, Military Topographic Institut, Czech Republic

Alternates
1. GPS/WAAS Curved Approaches: G.E. Michael, Strategic Aviation Consultants & Advisors Ltd.
2. New Shipboard Aviation Concepts Enabled by the Shipboard Relative GPS (SRGPS): G. Colby, Naval Air Systems Command; J. Waters, US Navy; K. Wallace, ARINC; H. McGrath, Booz-Allen and Hamilton

8:35. LEO GPS Attitude Determination Algorithm Designed for Real-Time On Board Execution: P. Cross, M. Ziebart, University College London, UK
8:57. GPS Attitude Determination Reliability Performance Improvement Using Low Cost Receivers: G. Lachapelle, C. Wang, University of Calgary, Canada
9:20. An Inexpensive and Robust GPS/INS Attitude System for Automobiles: S. Alban, Stanford University
9:43. Integer Ambiguity Resolution for Spacecraft Attitude Determination Using GPS: R. Lopes, National Institute for Space Research, Brazil

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Precision Kinematic Alignment Using a Low-Cost GPS/INS System: A. Brown, D. Sullivan, NAVSYS Corporation
10:47. The Development and Simulation Results of a GPS Attitude Determination Algorithm: N.P. Oliveira Leite, Instituto de Aeronautica e Espaco, Centro Tecnico Aeroespacial, Brazil; F. Walter, Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica, Brazil
11:10. Attitude Sensing Using a GPS Antenna on a Turntable, Experimental Tests: H. Jung, W.J. Scott, M.L. Psiaki, Cornell University
11:33. A Novel Quaternion Kalman Filter Using GPS Measurements: D. Choukroun, Israel Institute of Technology

Alternates
1. Performance Improvement of the GPS Attitude Determination Receiver for the Unmanned Aero Vehicle: S. Tae Kim, J. Ho Lee, S. Jeong Lee, Chungnam National University, Korea; S. Bo Son, Navicom Ltd., Korea; C. Park, Chungbuk National University, Korea
2. Efficient Attitude Determination Algorithm Using Geometrical Formulation: C. Kee, J. Jang, Y. Sohn, Seoul National University, South Korea

8:35. GLONASS: The Next Generation?: G.L. Cook, Sequoia Research Corp.
8:57. Incorporating End User Perspectives into GPS Requirements: R. Conley, Overlook Systems Technologies, Inc.
9:20. Increased Navigation Performance from GPS Block IIR: W.A. Marquis, Lockheed Martin Space Systems
9:43. Innovative Ways of Supporting an Aging GPS Constellation: D.A. Friedman, A.G. Werschky, 2nd Space Operations Squadron, Schriever AFB, CO

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Methodologies for Assessing Intrasystem and Intersystem Interference to Satellite Navigation Systems: A.J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems; C. Hegarty, The MITRE Corporation
10:47. Can Ultrawideband Devices and GPS Co-exist?: K. Maine, G. Lui, G. Gallien, D. Turner, R. Wong, P. Dafesh, T. Fan, The Aerospace Corporation; T.A. Stansell, Jr., Stansell Consulting LLC
11:10. Service Volume Simulations on the Received Power Level in L5/E5A: J. Winkel, IfEN, Germany; H. Kuhlen, T. Burger, Astrium, Germany
11:33. The Impact of Linear and Non-Linear Signal Distortions on Galileo Code Tracking Accuracy: M. Soellner, R. Kohl, W. Luetke, Astrium, Germany

Alternates
1. A Proposal for Managing Galileo Services: A. de Fatima Carvalho Ferreira, A. Anzaloni, Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica, Centro Tecnico Aeroespacial, Brazil
2. GALILEO Security Issues: P. Campagne, FDC, France
3. Actively Optimized Generic Codes: J. Winkel, IfEN, Germany

8:35. Assessment of WAAS Ionospheric Correction Algorithms in the South American Region: A.L. Komjathy, L. Sparks, T. Mannucci, X. Pi, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology; M. Fedrizzi, University of New Brunswick, Canada
8:57. Evaluation of EGNOS Ionospheric Correction Model Under Scintillation in Northern Europe: M. Aquino, T. Moore, A. Dodson, S. Waugh, IESSG, The University of Nottingham, UK
9:20. Accuracy Analysis of a 3-D Ionospheric Tomography Model: Z. Liu, Y. Gao, The University of Calgary, Canada
9:43. The Ionospheric Delay Effort for GPS Single-Frequency Users-Analysis Study for Simulation Purposes: A. Farah, IESSG, The University of Nottingham, UK

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Ionospheric Effects on Low-Latitude Space Based Augmentation Systems: P.H. Doherty, S.H. Delay, S. Datta-Barua, Boston College; T. Dehel, FAA Technical Center; E. de Paula, F.S. Rodrigues, INPE; J.A. Klobuchar, ISI Inc.
10:47. Adequacy of the SBAS Ionospheric Grid Concept for Precision Approach in the Equatorial Region: R. Lejeune, M.B. El-Arini, The MITRE Corporation; J.A. Klobuchar, Innovative Solutions for Scientific Research; P.H. Doherty, Boston College; T. Dehel, FAA Technical Center
11:10. Latitudinal Characteristics of L-band Ionospheric Scintillation: X. Pi, B.M. Boulat, A.J. Mannucci, D.A. Stowers, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
11:33. Enabling GPS Technology on Equatorial Ionosphere Monitoring During Geomagnectic Storm of July 15-17, 2000: H.Y. Hwa, W.S.W. Hassan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; A.F.M. Zain, Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia; M. Abdullah, Institute of Integrated Information Systems, The University of Leeds, UK; A.G. Ramli, Science and Technology Research

Alternates
1. A Canadian Ionospheric Warning and Alert System: M. El-Gizawy, S. Skone, University of Calgary, Canada
2. On-Orbit Single Frequency Ionospheric Analysis: W.M. Brooks, The Boeing Company; K.W. Key, Titan Systems Corporation
3. DSP Based Code Multipath and Ionosphere Delay Extraction from Single Frequency GPS Observations: L. Xia, J. Liu, Wuhan University, China

8:35. Detection and Repair of Cycle Slips in GPS Carrier-Phase Data Using QUAD Method: B.M. Han, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P. R. China
8:57. Monitoring Structure Vibration and Deformation by GPS in a "Constrained Kinematic Mode": R. Bueno, D. Blitzkow, N. Pacileo Neto, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil; J.F.G. Monico, Sao Paulo State University, Brazil
9:20. GPS Displacement Continuous Remote Monitoring System DANA 2000: T. Masunari, K. Tanaka, Furuno Electric Co., Ltd., Japan
9:43. Geodetic Considerations in Precise Wide Area Differential Global Positioning Systems: M.A.B. Jones, Fugro Survey Pty Ltd., Australia

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Use of Self-Contained Ionospheric Modelling to Enhance Long Baseline Multiple Reference Station RTK Positioning: P. Alves, G. Lachapelle, M.E. Cannon, L. Fortes, University of Calgary, Canada; J. Park, Korea Astronomy Observatory, South Korea
10:47. Virtual Reference Stations for Centimeter-Level Kinematic Positioning: L. Wanninger, Ingenieurbuero Wanninger, Germany
11:10. Creating Virtual L2 GPS Data Using a Combination of L1 Receivers and L1/L2 Reference Receivers: G. Roberts, E. Cosser, X. Meng, A. Dodson, IESSG, University of Nottingham, UK
11:33. Testing of an Active Multiple Reference Station Network for RTK Positioning: G. Hu; V.H.S. Khoo; P.C. Goh; C.L. Law, GPS Centre, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Alternates
1. Efficient Transmission Technique of Compact RTK Correction Messages for Low-Rate RTK Data-link (less than 600bps): C. Kee, J. Kim, Seoul National University, South Korea
2. The Detection of Abandoned Mineshafts Using GPS and Capacitively Coupled Resistivity Imaging: G. Roberts, K. Strange, M. Waller, IESSG, University of Nottingham, UK

8:35. Error Analysis of Step Length Estimation in Pedestrian Dead Reckoning: H. Leppakoski, J. Kappi, J. Takala, Tampere University of Technology, Finland; J. Syrjarinne, Nokia Mobile Phones, Finland
8:57. Low-Cost Autonomous Navigation for General Aviation: J.R. Branstetter, Federal Aviation Administration
9:20. Adaptive Kalman Filtering for Low Cost INS/GPS: C. Hide, T. Moore, M. Smith, IESSG, The University of Nottingham, UK
9:43. Integration of Dead Reckoning Sensors with MEMS IMU: E.K. Poh, H.C. Eng, DSO National Laboratories, Republic of Singapore


10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

Alternates
1. MEMS-IMU for Personal Positioning - A Gyro-Free Approach: J. Collin, J. Kappi, Institute of Digital and Computer Systems, Tampere University of Technology, Finland
2. Error Analysis of Low-Cost MEMS-Based Accelerometers for Land Vehicle Navigation: M. Park, Y. Gao, University of Calgary, Canada

10:25. Time Transfer Using GPSCP and TWSTT between CRL and TL: H. Peng, C. Liao, National Standard Time and Frequency Lab., TL, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd., Taiwan; M. Imae, Time and Frequency Measurements Group, Communications Research Laboratory, Japan
10:47. Two-Way Satellite Time Transfer to a Moving Platform: E. Powers, A. McKinley, U.S. Naval Observatory; J. Romberg, R. Griffin, D. Diner, H. Klotz, D. Wolters, Boeing
11:10. The Galileo Time Interface - Disseminating UTC to Users: S. Basker, Booz Allen Hamilton, UK; J. Laverty, National Physical Laboratory, UK
11:33. Indoor GPS Disciplined Clock: J.Y. Yu, Trimble Navigation

Alternates
1. New Approach to Accurate and Stable Time Standard through the Use of Optical Resonances and Mode-Locked Lasers: J.C. Diels, UNM, CHTM
2. Limits of Time Transfer Accuracy Using WAAS/EGNOS Geostationary Satellites with
Directional Dish Antenna, over Long Baselines: P. Fenton, NovAtel, Canada; B. Klepczynski, ISI Inc.; E. Powers, USNO; M. Weiss, NIST

2:05. Inertially-Aided RTK Performance Evaluation: B. Scherzinger, Applanix Corporation
2:27. Optimizing Smoothing Computation for Near Real-Time GPS Measurement Gap Filling in INS/GPS Systems: E.H. Shin, N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada
2:50. GPS-Aided All-Accelerometer Inertial Navigation and Gravity Gradiometry: A.H. Zorn, Dynamics Research Corporation
3:13. Investigation into Performance Characteristics of Frequency-Domain INS Calibration Procedure Under Noisy GPS Environments: A. Soloviev, F. van Graas, Ohio University

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. GPS/Pseudolite/SDINS Integration Approach for Kinematic Applications: H.K. Lee, The University of New South Wales, Australia

4:23. Different Algorithms for Bridging Kinematic DGPS Outages Using SINS/DGPS Integration: S. Nassar, University of Calgary, Canada
4:45. An Attitude Determination System with Enhanced TTFF(Time to First Fix) and Settling Time: S.B. Son, S.J. Moon, S.H. Lee, S.H. Kim, Navicom Co, Ltd., Korea; C. Park, Chungbuk National University, Korea; S.J. Lee, GNSS Technology Research Center, Chungnam National University, Korea
5:07. Fuzzy Corrections in a GPS/INS Hybrid Navigation System: A. Hiliuta, R. Landry, F. Gagnon, Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Canada

Alternate
1. On the Observability of Strapdown INS System During Maneuvers: I. Rhee, J.L. Speyer, M.F. Abdel-Hafez, University of California-Los Angeles

2:05. Signal-In-Space User Range Error Assessment via Combined Space and Ground-Based Measurement Data: J. DiLellio, The Boeing Company
2:27. Near-Term Integrity Improvements for the GPS Operational Control Segment: J. Langer, W. Feess, R. Haddad, M. Menn, The Aerospace Corporation
2:50. A Refinement to the World Geodetic System 1984 Referece Frame: M. Merrigan, E. Swift, NSWCDD; B. Wong, J. Saffel, NIMA
3:13. Implementation of the Inverted GPS Range for Modernized GPS Testing: T. Land, B. Elrod, ITT Industries; B. Bracy, W. Mims, 746th Test Squadron; A.J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. A Software Receiver for GPS-IIF L5 Signal: L. Ries, J.L. Issler, CNES, France
4:23. A New Class of Spreading Codes Exhibiting Low Cross-Correlation Properties: A.R. Pratt, OrbStar Consultants, consultants to DSTL, UK
4:45. Recommendations for a GPS III System Safety Program: K.S. Sandhoo, MITRE/CAASD
5:07. GNSS Cost/Effective Optimisation by Its Integration with TDRSS and Using Minimax Estimate Approach: V. Bobrov, L. Mazzini, Alenia Spazio, Italy

Alternates
1. User Range Error Evolution and Projected Performance: K. Ghassemi, Boeing Navigation Systems
2. GPS IIR-M: Modernizing the Signal-in-Space: J.A. Rajan, J.A. Tracy, ITT Industries, NJ Technology Center

2:05. Characterization of GPS Receivers for Mobile Systems: S.J. Spiegel, A. Thiel, I. Kovacs, S. Nussbaumer, U-Blox AG, Switzerland
2:27. A 7.5mA (Fully Active) GPS RF Module for Handheld Applications: P. Orsatti, F. Piazza, TChip Semiconductor SA, Switzerland

2:50. Extended Multiple Correlator for GPS Receivers: H.S. Seo, I.H. Choi, D.H. Hwang, S.J. Lee, Chungnam National University, Korea; J.P. Gwak, Navicom Co., Ltd.
3:13. The "Digital Indirectly Compensated Crystal Oscillator" (DICXO); A High-Performance Crystal Oscillator for Aircraft Precision Approach Applications: D. Domey, J.C. Lanoue, J. Studenny, CMC Electronics, Canada

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. Evaluation of an L5 Receiver Using Digital Pulse Blanking to Suppress Pulsed Interference: J. Grabowski, Zeta Associates; C. Hegarty, MITRE Corporation
4:23. Effect of Linear Time-Invariant Distortions on RNSS Code Tracking Accuracy: J.W. Betz, The MITRE Corporation
4:45. A High Performance GPS Solution for Mobile Use: K. Tanaka, T. Muto, K. Hori, M. Wakamori, K. Teranishi, H. Takahashi, M. Sawada, M. Ronning, Sony Corporation, Japan
5:07. A GPS Chip for Telematics and Road Tolling: P.G. Mattos, ST Microelectronics, UK

Alternates
1. Sensitivity Limit of a Stand-Alone GPS Receiver and the Acquisition Method: D.M. Lin, J.B.Y. Tsui, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base
2. A Comparison of Low Cost WAAS Sensors as Airborne Navigation PVT Sources: W. Ross, J. Fagan, University of Oklahoma
3. Ensuring Excellent Quality in High Volume Low Cost GPS Receivers: G. zur Bonsen, D. Ammann, A. Thiel, J.P. Wyss, u-blox AG, Switzerland

2:05. Experiments of Inverted Pseudolite Positioning for Airship-Based GPS Augmentation System: T. Tsujii, M. Harigae, Flight Systems Research Center, National Aerospace Laboratory of Japan; J. Barnes, J. Wang, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia
2:27. MSAS Flight Test and Its Progress: J. Imamura, Japanese Civil Aviation Bureau; K. Hoshinoo, M. Ito, N. Arai, K. Matsunaga, Electronic Navigation Research Institute; K. Ikegami, N. Hiroe, NEC Corporation; T. Hashimoto, M. Kawai, Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.
2:50. Galileo Augmentations for Precise Positioning Applications: I. Casewell, G. Morgan-Owen, R. Jones, A. Whitelaw, Thales Tracs Ltd., UK
4:00. EGNOS Performances at CDR: J.C. Levy, X. Derambure, H. Delfour, D. Flament, J.M. Pieplu, Alcatel Space Industries, France
4:23. EGNOS CPF Check Set - Standalone Performance: R. Wolf, U. Rossbach, W. Werner, IfEN GmbH, Germany; P. Thomas, Logica UK Ltd., UK; S. Lannelongue, J. Michelon, Alcatel Space Industries, France
4:45. A Long Term Comparative Study of WAAS and EGNOS Performance: S. Riley, P. Large, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
5:07. Extended Range Eurofix - A Robust 2,000 Km Range Datalink for EGNOS/WAAS Integrity Messages over the Polar Region: D. van Willigen, G.W.A. Offermans, A.W.S. Helwig, R. Kellenbach, W.J. Pelgrum, The Netherlands

2:05. The Landslide Monitoring System by GPS: Y. Watanabe, M. Genda, C. Fujise, K. Yui, Japan Radio Co., Ltd.
2:27. High Accuracy, Low Cost Integrated Positioning System for the Toronto Transit System: M.A. El-Gelil, A. El-Rabbany, Ryerson University, Canada
2:50. New Systems for Telematic Applications in Railway Traffic: S. Bedrich, N. Lemke, S. Muncheberg, Kayser-Threde GmbH, Germany
3:13. The Development of a GPS/Pseudolite Positioning System for Vehicle Tracking at BHP Steel, Port Kembla Steelworks: J. Barnes, J. Wang, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia; T. Nunan, C. Reid, BHP Steel, Port Kembla Steelworks, Australia

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. Improving KGPS/INS Performance and Reliability for Safety Applications with Vehicle Dynamic Constrains: J. Wang, C. Wilson, DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology Center North America Inc.

4:23. The Canada-Wide Differential GPS (CDGPS) Service: New Infrastructure Launched for GPS-Based Geo-Referencing and Navigation: A. Kassam, B. Hiasny, Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management, Canada; M. Carter, M.A. Carter and Associates; G. Panther, SiGEM Inc.; K. Lochhead, Geomatics Canada

4:45. High Efficiency Road Status Monitoring System: T.R. Cunha, P. Tome, Geonav, Ltd., Portugal; S.R. Cunha, University of Porto, Portugal
5:07. Construction Plant Control Using RTK GPS: Case Study: G. Roberts, O. Ogundipe, A. Dodson, IESSG, University of Nottingham, UK

Alternates
1. New Developments in River Level Monitoring Using GPS Heighting: T. Moore, G. Roberts, T. Veneboer, M. Pattinson, IESSG, The University of Nottingham, UK; G. Close, Science Systems (Space) Ltd.; R. Moore, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
2. From Satellite to Silo: Precision Farming with EGNOS: S. Basker, Booz Allen Hamilton, UK; J. Ventura-Traveset, G. Solari, European Space Agency; R. Reid, LH Agro Ltd., UK; C. Beatty, CBI Ltd

3. Integrated Car Navigation System for Urban Applications: Y. Meng, W. Chen, Z. Li, Y. Chen, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong; J. Chao, Brilliant Technology Development Ltd.

2:05. A Comparison of Stochastic Models for GPS Single Differential Kinematic Positioning: X. Liu, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
2:27. Kinematic Carrier Phase Differential GPS Positioning by Appyling the H/Sub Infinity/ Filter: S. Maruo, Y. Kubo, C. Uratani, R. Hata, S. Sugimoto, Ritsumeikan University, Japan
2:50. NovAtel Inc. New Positioning Filter: Phase Smoothing in the Position Domain: T. Ford, J. Hamilton, NovAtel Inc., Canada
3:13. Filtering Errors in LEO Trajectories Obtained by Kinematic GPS with Floated Ambiguities: O.L. Colombo, GEST/UMB; D.D. Rowlands, NASA GSFC; D. Chin, S. Poulouse, Raytheon ITSS

3:35–3:55, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

4:00. About a Pseudophase Concept in Satellite-Based Radio-Navigational Systems GPS and GLONASS. Forming of Pseudophase Measurements in GPS/GLONASS Navigational Receivers: A.A. Povalyaev
4:23. Statistical Analysis of Different RAIM Schemes: I. Nikiforov, Universite de Technologie de Troyes, France; B. Roturier, STNA/3EN - GNSS, France
4:45. Analyzing the Performance Characteristics of a Precise Point Positioning System: M. Abdel-Salam, Y. Gao, X. Shen, The University of Calgary, Canada
5:07. GPS Meteorology in a Military Environment: D.A. Garay, J.F. Raquet, G.R. Huffines, M.M. Miller, Air Force Institute of Technology

8:35. Performance of the JPALS Shipboard Integrity Monitor: D. Gebre-Egziabher, M. Koenig, S. Pullen, U.S. Kim, P. Enge, Stanford University; B.S. Pervan, F.C. Chan, Illinois Institute of Technology; G. Colby, Naval Air Systems Command
8:57. Precision Approach Test Summary for Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System (GPS/WAAS) Guidance of the Sikorsky (N38) Helicopter: D.P. Stapleton, Innovative Solutions International; M. Monroney, Aeronautical Center
9:20. Availability Requirements for Local Area Augmentation System: T. Urda, Federal Aviation Administration; N.G. Mathur, Advanced Management Technologies Incorporated / FAA
9:43. LAAS Ground Facility Design Improvements to Meet Proposed Requirements for Category II/III Operations: S. Pullen, M. Luo, G. Xie, J. Lee, R.E. Phelts, D. Akos, G. Elkaim, P. Enge, Stanford University

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Multi-Antenna GPS Reception with Vehicle Flexure: I.S. Ahn, Bradley University; J.W. Sennott, Tracking and Imaging Systems Inc.
10:47. A Simulation Tool to Evaluate the Aircraft Landing Performance of a Satellite-Based Landing System: F. Liu, M. Jeerage, M. Elgersma, M. Brenner, P. Kline, Honeywell International
11:10. A Preliminary Comparison between WAAS and LAAS Flight Test Results During Cat 1 Instrument Approaches to Landing Using Cat A and B Aircraft: J. Fagan, W. Ross, University of Oklahoma, B. Billman, FAATC Atlantic City, G. McCarter, FAA-AFS-420, Ralph Sexton, ISI
11:33. Autonomous Landing Using Carrier-Phase GPS/IMU Fused Instrumentation System: S. Chan, M. Stolarczyk, W. Williamson, I. Rhee, J.L. Speyer, University of California, Los Angeles

Alternates
1. Derivation of CNS/ATM System Requirements for the JPALS Shipboard Relative GPS System: D. King, J. Hansen, D. Rudy, Sierra Nevada Corporation
2. Reference Station Antenna Diversity and Spatial Processing to Enhance Kinematic GPS Continuity and Integrity: A. Brown, K. Stolk, S. Pinder, NAVSYS Corporation

8:35. Toward Decimeter-Level Real-Time Orbit Determination: A Demonstration Using the SAC-C and Champ Spacecraft: A. Reichert, T. Meehan, T. Munson, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
8:57. Determination of Single GPS-Antenna-Attitude of CHAMP: R.Z. Zhang, Institute of Geodesy and Navigation, University FAF Munich, Germany
9:20. Robust Filtering Techniques for Autonomous Spacecraft Orbit Determination: N. Zhou, Y. Feng, Cooperative Research Centre for Satellite Systems of Queensland University of Technology, Australia
9:43. Initial Orbit Determination Results for Jason-1: Towards a 1-cm Orbit: B. Haines, W. Bertiger, S. Desai, D. Kuang, T. Munson, A. Reichert, L. Young, P. Willis, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. GRACE: Millimeters and Microns in Orbit: W. Bertiger, C. Dunn, B. Haines, G. Kruizinga, D. Kuang, S. Nandi, L. Romans, S. Wu, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
10:47. Performance of the Flexible Inertial Relative Estimator (FIRE) for Terrestrial and On-Orbit Relative Navigation: K. Key, S. Vitalpur, Titan Systems Corporation
11:10. Precise Spacecraft Relative Navigation Using Kinematic Inter-Spacecraft State Estimates: T. Ebinuma, E.G. Lightsey, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin; O. Montenbruck, German Space Operation Center, Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt, Germany
11:33. Four-Vehicle Formation Flying Hardware Simulation Results: F.D. Busse, Stanford University; J.P. How, MIT; J. Simpson, J. Leitner, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Alternates
1. Applying GPS to a Constellation of Disaster Monitoring Satellites: M. Unwin, S. Gleason, Y. Hashida, Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, UK; M. Adjrad, CNTS, Algeria
2. Precise Position Determination in Space with GPS: D. Grejner-Brzezinska, The Ohio State University; J. Kwon, Sejong University, Korea

8:35. A New GPS Microstrip Antenna with Low Susceptibility to Multipath Interference: L.I. Basilio, J.T. Williams, D.R. Jackson, University of Houston
8:57. The LAAS Integrated Multipath Limiting Antenna (IMLA): D.B. Thornberg, D.S. Thornberg, dB Systems Inc.; M. DiBenedetto, M.S. Braasch, F. van Graas, C. Bartone, Ohio University
9:20. Miniaturization of L1/L2 Anti-Jam GPS Antenna Array: Z.B. Lin, Sensor Systems, Inc.; R. Castillo, J.J.Q. Lin, S. Robin
9:43. Multipath Characteristics of GPS Signals as Determined from the Antenna and Multipath Calibration System: K.D. Park, J.L. Davis, P.O.J. Jarlemark, P. Elosegui, J.E. Normandeau, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; B.E. Corey, A.E. Niell, MIT Haystack Observatory; C.E. Meertens, V. Andreatta, UNAVCO/UCAR

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Design and Simulation of a Miniaturized GPS Dual-Frequency (L1/L2) Antenna Array: H. Ly, Naval Research Laboratory; H.W. Tseng, R. Kurtz, A. Brown, NAVSYS Corporation; D. Nathans, F. Pahr, SPAWAR Systems Center
10:47. A Comparison of Relative and Absolute Phase Center Calibration Model Performance in Practical Real Time Positioning Applications: P. Large, N. Pugh, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
11:10. Multiple Level Integrity Monitoring in Assisted GPS: H. Sairo, J. Takala, Tampere University of Technology, Finland; J. Syrjarinne, Nokia Mobile Phones, Finland
11:33. Constrained Adaptive Monopulse for GPS Attitude Determination under Jamming: C. Yang, Sigtem Technology, Inc.

Alternates
1. Defining the Effective Radiation Point for a Microstrip Patch Antenna: L.I. Basilio, J.T. Williams, D.R. Jackson, University of Houston
2. Design and Performance Results for a Single Element GPS Antenna Suitable for Use in Multi Element CRPA Arrays Developed by EDO AP&T Systems: E. Traum, S. Murphy, P. Eyring, EDO AP&T

8:35. Galileo Ground Segment for Navigation and Integrity: M. Lugert, M. Falcone, P. Claes, A. Castro, J.A. Martinez, S. Matussi, D. Blonski, ESA GALILEO Project Office, ESTEC Noordwijk, The Netherlands
8:57. The GALILEO System Test Bed for Early Prototyping and Experimentation of Galileo Algorithms: M. Falcone, F. Amarillo-Fernandez, J. Hahn, H. Favin-Leveque, ESA ESTEC, The Netherlands
8:57. A Study of Galileo Performance: GPS Interoperability and Discriminators for Urban and Indoor Environments: M. O´Donnell, J. Cole, M. Stevens, Astrium Ltd., UK; S. Simpson, J. Fisher, Roke Manor Research Ltd., UK; G. Brodin, E. Bryant, D. Walsh, A. Cartmell, University of Leeds, UK
9:43. SISA Computation Algorithms and Their Applicability for Galileo Integrity: C. Hernadez Medel, M.M. Romay Merino, A. Mozo Garcia, J.R. Martin Piedelobo, L. Perea y Virgili, GMV SA, Spain

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Galileo Integrity Performance Assessment Results and Recommendations: W. Werner, T. Zink, IfEN GmbH, Germany; J. Hahn, ESA, The Netherlands
10:47. Evaluation of Acquisition, Tracking and Data Demodulation Thresholds for GNSS Signals: F. Bastide, TeSA, France; O. Julien, University of Calgary, Canada; C. Macabiau, ENAC, France
11:10. Performance Analysis of GPS, GALILEO and Integrated GPS-GALILEO: S. Verhagen, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
11:33. Experimental Assessment of Galileo Clocks Performance in Space: C. Bourga, B. Lobert, Alcatel Space Industries, France; M. Brunet, CNES, France

Alternates
1. A Software Simulation Tool for GNSS2 BOC Signals Analysis: L. Ries, L. Lestarquit, J.L. Issler, CNES, France
2. A Joint Time Multiplex Receiver for Galileo and UMTS: R. Bischoff, University of Paderborn, Germany
3. GATE: The German GALILEO Test Environment: G.W. Hein, B. Eissfeller, Institute of Geodesy and Navigation, University FAF Munich, Germany; J. Pielmeier, IfEN GmbH, Poing, Germany

8:35. GPS Scintillation Data at the Equatorial Anomaly: Implications for Moving Receivers: P.M. Kintner, B. Ledvina, Cornell University; E.R. de Paula, INPE, Brazil
8:57. An Impact of High Ionospheric Activity on MultiRef RTK Network Performance in Japan: I. Petrovski, S. Kawaguchi, H. Torimoto, DX Antenna Co.Ltd., Japan; B. Townsend, Forgis Technologies, Canada; S. Hatsumoto, K. Fujii, Hitachi Ltd.
9:20. Improvements to the WAAS Ionospheric Algorithms: E. Altshuler, D. Cormier, H. Go, Raytheon Systems Company
9:43. Coastal Sea State Measurements Using GPS Reflected Signals from an Airborne Platform: E. Cardellach, J.M. Aparicio, D. Pino, J. Torrobella, A. Rius, Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia, Spain

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. The LAGRANGE Radio-Occultation Receiver: Signal Modelling and Tracking Algorithms Simulation: A. Di Cintio, E. Banfi, L. Martinelli, S. Monti, Laben S.p.A., Italy
10:47. Accuracy Assessment for GPS Water Vapour Estimation Using Surface Meteorological Data from Automatic Weather Stations in Australia: Z. Bai, Y. Feng, Cooperative Research Centre for Satellite Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
11:10. Numerical Weather Predictions for Kinematic GPS Positioning: A.B.O. Jensen, National Survey and Cadastre, Denmark
11:33. Tropospheric Delay Estimation from a Moving GPS Receiver: M. Pattinson, A. Dodson, T. Moore, IESSG,The University of Nottingham, UK

Alternates
1. Limitations on Tropospheric Corrections from Natural Variations: J.R. Clynch, K.L. Davidson, Naval Postgraduate School

2. Estimating Local Ionosphere Parameters in Norway: N. Kjorsvik, O. Ovstedal, J. Glenn, G. Svendsen, Department of Mapping Sciences, AUoN, Norway

8:35. Establishing a Network RTK Solution in Great Britain; From Schema to Solution: I. Wilson, G. Pennington, P. Cruddace, M. Greaves, Ordnance Survey Great Britain; H.J. Euler, Leica Geosystems AG; G. Wuebbena, Geo++ GmbH
8:57. Investigations on the Use of Numerical Weather Predictions, Ray Tracing, and Tropospheric Mapping Functions for Network RTK: A.B.O. Jensen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
9:20. Multi-Reference GPS Network for the Nationwide RTK Service in Korea: J.U. Park, J.H. Joh, H.C. Lim, P.H. Park, Korea Astronomy Observatory, South Korea; B.H. Choi, S.W. Lee, Munhwa Broadcasting Co., South Korea; B. Townsend, Forgis Technologies Inc., Canada; M.E. Cannon, G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada
9:43. Using Interpolation and Extrapolation Techniques to Yield High Data Rates from Continuously Operating GPS Networks: G.L. Mader, M.L. Morrison, National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA

10:05 - 10:20, Break (Refreshments in Exhibit Hall)

10:25. Comparison of Different Proposals for Reference Station Network Information Distribution Formats: H.J. Euler, Leica Geosystems, Switzerland; B.R. Townsend, Forgis Technologies Inc.; G. Wuebbena, Geo++ GmbH

10:47. Optimizing the Use of GPS Multi-Reference Stations for Kinematic Positioning: L.P.S. Fortes, The University of Calgary, Canada
11:10. Texas Department of Transportation Differential Global Positioning System Real-Time Spatial Reference Frame Network: S.D. Lyle, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi; L. Wall, The Dallas District Texas Department of Transportation
11:33. Broadcast Network RTK - Transmission Standards and Results: N. Talbot, G. Lu, T. Allison, Trimble Navigation, Australia; U. Vollath, Trimble-TerraSat

Alternate
2. Networked Real-Time Kinematic Global Positioning System (RTK-GPS) Provides Answers for Full-Scale Earthquake Test in Japan: L.L. Turner

1:35. Design of a Hybrid and Flexible Height Reference System for Flight Inspection: D. Gondy, Aerodata Systems GmbH, Germany; J.F. Wagner, Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg, Germany
1:57. Robust GPS/INS Integrated System in Urban Region: GPS/INS/Pseudolite Integration: Y. Yi, The Ohio State University
2:20. Tightly Coupled GPS and Dead-Reckoning Navigation for Fleet Management Applications: S. Cunha, L. Bastos, T. Cunha, P. Tome, Porto University, Portugal
2:43. Multi-Sensor Smoothing Techniques for Post-Processed Vehicle Localisation: D. Betaille, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussees, France; P. Bonnifait, Heudiasyc UMR UTC/CNRS 6599, France

While there is no scheduled program break, refreshments will be available from 3 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. in Lobby B.

3:06. Modern Remote Sensing Techniques Supporting Traffic Flow Estimates: D. Grejner-Brzezinska, C. Toth, T. Lovas, National Consortium for Remote Sensing in Transportation - Flows, The Ohio State University
3:30. Train and Cargo Monitoring and Control with a "Radio Compass": N. Lemke, S. Bedrich, Kayser-Threde GmbH, Germany; T. Luck, B. Eissfeller, IfEN, University FAF Munich, Germany
3:52. Evaluation of Coupled GPS/INS Integration Using Software GPS Receiver Model: E.K. Poh, G. Wong, A. Koh, DSO National Laboratories, Singapore
4:14. Test Results Using the GPS/INS Generalized Evaluation Tool (GIGET) for Design and Comparison of Integrated Systems for Three Varied Applications: J. Gautier, B. Parkinson, Stanford University; S. Smith, J. Delucchi, Trimble Navigation

Alternate
1. Integrated Navigation Systems for Vehicles, Bicycles, and Pedestrians: W. Lechner, S. Baumann, Telematica e.K., Germany

1:35. Critical Role of a GPS and Radar Aided Inertial Navigation System to a Successful Exo-Atmospheric Intercept of a Ballistic Missile: J. Anders, C. Johnson, A. Luckau, T.A. Moore, R.S. Ornedo, Raytheon
1:57. Instrumentation of Paratroopers and Large Parachute Pallet Loads: J.M. Strus, E.G. Blackwell, C.A. Gellrich, M.R. Kirkpatrick, J.W. Sinko, SRI International
2:20. Horizontal Geolocation of Short-Duration Ground Events from an Aircraft: A.G. Evans, J.B. Wedding, B.R. Hermann, J.P. Cunningham, U.V. Bhapkar, A.W. Sutter, C.S. Law, Naval Surface Warfare Center
2:43. GRAM/SAASM Receivers for the AN/ASN-128B Doppler/GPS Navigation System: H. Buell, G. Rogala, BAE Systems

While there is no scheduled program break, refreshments will be available from 3 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. in Lobby B.

3:06. SAASM Upgrades to Missiles and Bombs Drives Need to Upgrade Aircraft: W.C. Caldwell, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
3:30. Military GPS Avionics Receivers for Civil Air Space Operations: P. Braisted, A. Edwards, Trimble Navigation Military and Advanced Systems
3:52. The International GMLRS Development Program - A GPS/INS Application to Extend the Range and Effectiveness of the Basic Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) (Update): B. King, Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control; C. Eckert, Honeywell Core Avionics Group; R. Minor, Rockwell Collins Government Systems
4:14. G-STAR - Advanced GPS AJ Technology: J. Naylor, S. Sorber, C. Apker, Lockheed Martin

1:35. Tracking of GPS Code Phase and Carrier Frequency in the Frequency Domain: C. Yang, Sigtem Technology, Inc.
1:57. Fine Frequency Resolving Acquisition Methods for GPS Receivers: D. Akopian, H. Valio, S. Turunen, Nokia Mobile Phones, Finland
2:20. A Prototyping Platform for Multifrequency GNSS Receivers: D.M. Akos, Stanford University; J. Thor, EISLAB, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden
2:43. A Weak Signal Tracking Technique for a Stand Alone Software GPS Receiver: D.M. Lin, J.B.Y. Tsui, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base

While there is no scheduled program break, refreshments will be available from 3 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. in Lobby B.

3:06. Extended Kalman Filter Methods for Tracking Weak GPS Signals: M.L. Psiaki, H. Jung, Cornell University
3:30. OpensourceGPS: Open Source Software for Learning about GPS: C. Kelley, University of Southern California; J. Cheng, University of California Riverside; J. Barnes, University of New South Wales
3:52. Real-Time Software GPS Receiver: J.J. Schamus, Veridian Engineering; J.B.Y. Tsui, D.M. Lin, AFRL/SNRP, Wright-Patterson AFB
4:14. SDR Technology Applied to Galileo Receivers: F. Dovis, A. Gramazio, P. Mulassano, Politecnico di Torino, Italy

Alternates
1. Integration of Galileo and UMTS Services Using a Software Radio Based Receiver: M. Musso, G. Gera, M. Guainazzo, C.S. Regazzoni, University of Genoa, Italy
2. Real-Time Dual Frequency Software GPS Receiver: A. Jovancevic, A. Brown, S. Ganguly, M. Kirchner, S. Zigic, Center for Remote Sensing, Inc.

1:35. Analysis of a Three-Frequency GPS/WAAS Receiver to Land an Airplane: S.S. Jan, Stanford University
1:57. Fault Detection and Isolation in High-Sensitivity Assisted GPS: H. Kuusniemi, H. Leppakoski, J. Takala, Tampere University of Technology, Finland; J. Syrjarinne, Nokia Mobile Phones, Finland
2:20. Integration of the Multipath Limiting Antenna with the LAAS Integrity Monitor Testbed: P.L. Normark, D.M. Akos, S. Pullen, G. Xie, J. Lee, M. Luo, P. Enge, Stanford University; B. Pervan, Illinois Institute of Technology
2:43. Integrity Measure for Assisted GPS Based on Weighted Dilution of Precision: H. Sairo, H. Leppakoski, J. Takala, Tampere University of Technology, Finland; J. Syrjarinne, Nokia Mobile Phones, Finland

While there is no scheduled program break, refreshments will be available from 3 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. in Lobby B.

3:06. Analysis of Pseudolite Augmentation for GPS Airborne Applications: H.K. Lee, J. Wang, C. Rizos, J. Barnes, University of New South Wales, Australia; T. Tsujii, Flight Systems Research Center, National Aerospace Laboratory, Japan; B.K.H. Soon, Defense Science Organization, Singapore
3:30. GPS/IRS Hybridization: Fault Detection and Isolation of More Than One Failure: A.C. Escher, C. Macabiau, V. Vogel, ENAC, France; N. Martin, Thales-Avionics, France; B. Roturier, STNA, France
3:52. The Synergistic CORS Program Continues to Evolve: R. Snay, G. Adams, M. Chin, S. Frakes, T. Soler, N. Weston, National Geodetic Survey
4:14. Statistical Model to Minimize the GPS System Errors: A Tool to Support DGPS/GBAS: L.C. Laureano da Rosa, D.R. Mendez Castillo, F. Walter, Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica, Brazil

Alternates
1. Accuracy and Repeatability Evaluation of the CDGPS Wide-Area Service: M.E. Cannon, G. Lachapelle, S. Skone, Y. Gao, University of Calgary, Canada
3. Getting EGNOS Ready for Initial Operations: J.Y. Schneider, C. Ruf, Thales ATM GmbH, Germany; P. Rosenthal, Thales ATM Navigation GmbH, Germany; B. Charlot, M. Lemaire, Alcatel Space Industries, France; NN, European Space Agency, France

1:35. Marine Radiobeacons DGNSS Service - Predicting Availability and Continuity: A.J. Grant, D. Last, University of Wales, UK; N. Ward, Trinity House Lighthouse Service, UK
1:57. Fault Detection Methods and Testing for Marine GPS Receivers: G. MacGougan, J. Liu, University of Calgary, Canada
2:20. A Comparison Between "Absolute" Satellite Positioning Methods and Differential Methods in a Maritime Environment: O. Ovstedal, Agricultural University of Norway; K.T. Haustveit, O. Kristiansen, A.E. Ofstad, Hydrographic Service, Norwegian Mapping Authority
2:43. GPS for Maritime Transponders: "The Standards Versus Market Forces": G. Gillow, D. English, P. Geiser, ARINC Engineering Services

While there is no scheduled program break, refreshments will be available from 3 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. in Lobby B.

3:06. Optimising Availability and Continuity of the Portuguese DGPS Network: T. Moore, C. Hill, IESSG, The University of Nottingham, UK; S. Monteiro, IESSG, The University of Nottingham, UK and Portuguese Hydrographic Office
3:30. Nationwide DGPS: 2002 and Beyond: D.B. Wolfe, C.L. Judy, A.B. Kritz, J.A. Chop, M.W. Parsons, United States Coast Guard Command and Control Engineering Center
3:52. An Application of Wide-Lane to Long Baseline GPS Measurements (2): H. Isshiki, Institute of Mathematical Analysis, Japan; T. Sugiyama, Pegasusnet Corp.
4:14. Enhanced Accuracy by Regional Operation of Europe´s New Radiobeacon Differential System: D. Last, A. Grant, A. Bryant, University of Wales, UK; N. Ward, Trinity House Lighthouse Service, UK

Alternates
1. THALES Navigation´s New Integrated Marine Solution Offering LRK Positioning and Accurate Heading Determination: Technique, Field Results and Applications: P. Lutz, R. Gounon, J.C. Pascal, THALES Navigation
2. Error Modeling for the SOG Measurements by GPS Receivers: Y.A. Komarovskiy, Far-Eastern State Marine Academy, Russia
3. A Proposed Marine Traffic Control System for the Suez Canal Based on Modernized GPS System: H. El Saadawy, Arab Academy for Science & Technology & Maritime Transport, Egypt
4. GPS Wave Observation System with Arrayed Buoys: H. Fujii, Oshima National College of Maritime Technology, Japan; N. Kouguchi, H. Ishida, Maritime University of Kobe, Japan; I. Deguchi, Osaka University, Japan

1:35. GPS Position Can Be Computed Without the Navigation Message: N. Sirola, Tampere University of Technology, Finland; J. Syrjarinne, Nokia Mobile Phones, Finland
1:57. Modified Observation Model and Design Computations for Positioning with GPS and Pseudolites: S.Verhagen, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
2:20. Impact of Real-Time Ionospheric Determination on Improving Precise Navigation with GALILEO and Next-Generation GPS: M. Hernandez-Pajares, J.M. Juan, J. Sanz, gAGE/UPC, Spain; O.L. Colombo, GEST/NASA GSFC
2:43. An Optimum Recursive Filter for Relative Navigation Using GPS Accumulated Phase Measurements: D.B. Cox, Jr., DBC Communications, Inc.; J.D.W. Brading, Brading Systems and Technology

While there is no scheduled program break, refreshments will be available from 3 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. in Lobby B.

3:06. Network RTK Versus Single Base RTK - Understanding the Error Characteristics: U. Vollath, H. Landau, Trimble Terrasat, Germany
3:30. RTK for Instant Multibase/Network Solutions: L.B. Rapoport, A.E. Zinoviev, Topcon Positioning Systems, Russia
3:52. A Methodology for Reducing the Admissible Hypotheses for GPS Integer Ambiguity Resolution: M.F. Abdel-Hafez, W.L. Williamson, J.D. Wolfe, J.L. Speyer, UCLA; Y.J. Lee, Konkuk University, Korea
4:14. A Comparison of TCAR and LAMBDA GNSS Ambiguity Resolution: P.J.G. Teunissen, C.C.J.M. Tiberius, P. Joosten, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Alternates
1. Recursive Kinematic Filtering Algorithms for Multi-Level Kinematic GPS Positioning Solutions: Y. Feng, Cooperative Research Centre for Satellite Systems of Queensland University of Technology, Australia; C. Rizos, J. Zhang, The University of New South Wales, Australia
2. Variance Component Estimation to Facilitate GPS Ambiguity Resolution: J. Wu, C.M. Tsai, Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research National Central University, Taiwan