Technical Sessions

Special Events & Tourist Information

Accommodations

Transportation

Online Registration

1. Status Update of the GPS Integrity Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (IFMEA) Project: K. Kovach, ARINC; J. Lavrakas, Overlook Systems; K. Van Dyke, DOT/Volpe Center; C. Miles, FAA; E. Phelts, S. Pullen, Stanford University
2. The Effects of Large Ionospheric Gradients on Single Frequency Airborne Smoothing Filters for WAAS and LAAS: T. Walter, S. Datta-Barua, J. Blanch, Stanford University
3. Signal Deformations on Nominally Healthy GPS Satellites: A. Mitelman, E. Phelts, D. Akos, S. Pullen, P. Enge, Stanford University
4. Range Biases on the WAAS Geostationary Satellites: R.E. Phelts, T. Walter, D. Akos, P. Enge, Stanford University; K. Shalberg, T. Morrissey, Zeta Associates Inc.
5. Recommendations on the Use of the L2 Civil (L2C) Signal for WAAS: M.B. El-Arini, M. Tran, T. Kim, D. O´Laughlin, C. Hegarty, S. Ericson, The MITRE Corporation
6. GPS Augmentation Using Japanese Quasi-Zenith Satellite System: F. Wu, N. Kubo, A. Yasuda, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan

Alternates
1. Ionospheric Integrity Lessons from the WAAS Integrity Performance Panel (WIPP): T. Walter, P. Enge, Stanford University
2. A New Position Domain Algorithm to Improve WAAS Availability and Continuity While Maintaining Integrity: G. Mu, J.E. Fagan, J.P. Havlicek, University of Oklahoma
3. A Study on High-Accuracy Positioning System Enhanced by Quasi-Zenith Satellites: T. Furukawa, M. Saito, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan

1. Network-Based Nationwide RTK-GPS and Indoor Navigation Intended for Seamless Location Based Services: H. Higuchi, A. Harada, T. Iwahashi, S. Usui, J. Sawamoto, J. Kanda, K. Wakimoto, S. Tanaka, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan
2. Performance of a Precision Indoor Positioning System Using a Multi-Carrier Approach: D. Cyganski, J.A. Orr, W.R. Michalson, WPI
3. Effect of the Error in LoS(Line of Sight) Unit Vector on Pseudolite-Based Positioning System: C. Kee, H. So, J. Kim, H. Jun, Seoul National University, South Korea
4. Measurements and Modeling of the Satellite-to-Indoor Channel for Galileo: F. Perez-Fontan, B. Sanmartin, A. Steingass, A. Lehner, E. Kubista, B. Arbesser-Rastburg, German Aerospace Center, Germany
5. Modeling of the GNSS Directional Radio Channel in Urban Areas Based on Synthetic Environments: O. Esbri, A. Konovaltsev, A. Hornbostel, Germany
6. GNSS Signal Reliability Testing in Urban and Indoor Environments: H. Kuusniemi, The University of Calgary, Canada/Tampere University of Technology, Finland; G. Lachapelle, The University of Calgary, Canada

Alternate
1. Multipath Performance Analysis for Future GNSS Signals: M. Irsigler, B. Eissfeller, Institute of Geodesy and Navigation, University FAF Munich, Germany

1. Honeywell MEMS Inertial Technology & Product Status: J.G. Hanse, Honeywell Intl. Inc.
2. Low Cost MEMS Inertial Measurement Unit : A. Kourepenis, J. Connelly, J. Sitomer, Draper Laboratory; J. Ha, Air Force Research Laboratory; J. Paris, D. Syse, 746th Test Squadron, USAF
3. Head Tracking for 3-D Audio Using a GPS-Aided MEMS IMU: J.M. Joffrion, J.F. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology
4. Improving the Performance of MEMS-Based Inertial Sensors by Removing Short-Term Errors Utilizing Wavelet Multi-Resolution Analysis: W. Abdel-Hamid, A. Osman, N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada; A. Noureldin, Royal Military College of Canada
5. Development of a Low-Cost Solution for GPS/Gyro Attitude Determination: C. Wang, G. Lachapelle, The University of Calgary, Canada
6. A Generic Interface Standard for Inertial Measurement Units: S.K. Davison, J. Stevenson, QinetiQ, U.K.; J.I.R. Owen, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, U.K.; S.L. Saks, Aerospace Corporation; E. Ringbom, U.S. Air Force

Alternates
1. Flight Test Evaluations of a GPS Attitude Determination System Using Non-Dedicated GPS Receiver System: N.P. Oliveira Leite, Instituto de Aeronautica e Espaco, Brazil; F. Walter, Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica, Brazil
2. Instantaneous Attitude Determination in the Condition of Low Satellite Visibility: C. Kee, J. Jang, Seoul National University, South Korea

1. Modeling the Affects of High-Powered Signals on the Civilian GPS Users: K.R. Meyer, Advanced Information Engineering Services, A General Dynamics Company
2. The Proposed State Vector Representation of Broadcast Navigation Message for User Equipment Implementation of GPS Satellite Ephemeris Propagation: R. DiEsposti, J. DiLellio, C. Kelley, The Boeing Company; A. Dorsey, Lockheed Martin; H. Fliegel, J. Berg, C. Edgar, The Aerospace Corporation; T. McKendree, Raytheon Fullerton; P. Shome, Federal Aviation Administration
3. CSC Codes: Performance Attributes and Options for Galileo Applications: A.R. Pratt, Orbstar Consultants, U.K.; J.I.R. Owen, DSTL, U.K.
4. Time Dissemination and Synchronization for Galileo Users: J. Furthner, J. Hammesfahr, A. Konovaltsev, A. Moudrak
5. Multipath Performance of the New GNSS Signals: C. Hegarty, M. Tran, The MITRE Corporation
6. Modernizing GPS Via On-Orbit Enhancements: J.A. Rajan, S. Rajan, M. Policano, ITT Aerospace

Alternates
1. Investigation of Feasibility of Vertical Navigation Using an Airborne Integrity Method Integrating GPS with Galileo Signals: Y. Lee, CAASD/The MITRE Corporation
2. Robust Integrity Monitoring for Precision Approaches with GPS+Galileo: P. Misra, S. Bednarz, MIT Lincoln Laboratory
3. The System Verification Approach for Galileo: F. Gottifredi, Galileo Industries / Alenia Spazio S.p.A., Italy; R. Stalford, Galileo Industries, Italy

1. Tracking Loop Dynamics and Synchronous AGC for GPS: J. Hill, University of Hartford
2. Performance of GPS/Galileo Receivers Using m-PSK BOC Signals: A.R. Pratt, Orbstar Consultants, U.K.; J.I.R. Owen, DSTL, U.K.
3. Real Time Block Processing Engine for Software GNSS Receivers: S. Gunawardena, F. van Graas, Ohio University
4. Sensitivity Improvement of a Low Cost Commercial GPS Receiver Through Software Approach: D. Lin, J. Tsui, L. Liou, J. Schamus, AFRL/SNRP
5. Improvements on the Acquisition Process of a Maximum Likelihood GPS Receiver: I.F. Progri, California State Polytechnic University Pomona
6. The GPS MLA Antenna Code and Carrier Corrections Formation and Analysis: T. Arthur, C. Bartone, Ohio University Avionics Engineering Center

Alternates
1. Implementation and Verification of a Software-Based IF GPS Signal Simulator: L. Dong, C. Ma, G. Lachapelle, The University of Calgary, Canada
2. Development and Flight Testing of a Low Cost VHF Data Link Antenna for the Ground-Based Regional Augmentation System (GRAS): W.S. Ely, Airservices Australia
3. Navigation Signal Processing with FPGAs: J. Hill, University of Hartford

1. A High Performance Projected DGPS Ambiguity Resolution Technique: Y. Zhang, C. Bartone, Ohio University
2. Improved Triple-Frequency GPS/GALILEO Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution Using a Stochastic Ionosphere Modeling: O. Julien, P. Alves, M.E. Cannon, The University of Calgary, Canada
3. Improvement of Positioning Performance Using Standardized Network RTK Messages on Surveying Rovers: H.-J. Euler, S. Seeger, O. Zelzer, F. Takac, B. Zebhauser, Leica Geosystems AG, Switzerland
4. Test Results of RTK-GPS Using Low-Rate Data-Link: C. Kee, J. Kim, Seoul National University, South Korea
5. Analysis of the Network Geometry and Station Separation for Network-Based RTK: D.A. Grejner-Brzezinska, I. Kashani, P. Wielgosz, Ohio State University
6. Network-Based RTK-GPS Positioning Using Area Correction Parameter (FKP) Via TV Broadcast in Japan: C. Fan, N. Kubo, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan; K. Nishikawa, S. Usui, Mitsubishi Electric Co., Japan; K. Sasano, Asahi National Broadcasting Co., Japan; T. Tanaka, LSI Japan Co., Ltd., Japan; H. Hasegawa, GeoNet, Inc., Japan; H

Alternates
1. An Adaptive Kinematic GPS Positioning Technique: G.-S. Huang, National Chin-Yi Institute of Technology, Taiwan; C.-C. Tsai, National Chung-Hsing University
2. Approximating the Probability Density of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Case of Ambiguous Measurements: A.A. Povalyaev, Moscow Aviation Institute, Russia

1. Ionosphere Spatial Gradient Threat for LAAS: Mitigation and Tolerable Threat Space: M. Luo, S. Pullen, S. Datta-Barua, H. Konno, G. Xie, T. Walter, P. Enge, Stanford University; T. Dehel, J. Warburton, V. Wullschleger, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center
2. A Study of the Ionospheric Effect on GBAS (Ground-Based Augmentation System) Using Nation-Wide GPS Network in Japan: T. Yoshihara, Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Japan; N. Fujii Naoki, ENRI
3. Comparison of Performance Results of Ionospheric Tomography and Thin Shell Algorithms for an SBAS in Brazil: R. Lejeune, M.B. El-Arini, S. Ericson, The MITRE Corporation/CAASD
4. A New Ionospheric Estimation Technique for SBAS Combining Tomography and Kriging: J. Blanch, T. Walter, P. Enge, Stanford University
5. Estimating SBAS Ionospheric Delays Without Grids: The Conical Domain Approach: L. Sparks, A. Komjathy, A.J. Mannucci, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
6. Evaluation of the Effect of Scintillation on L1, L2, and L5 GPS/SBAS Receivers Using Analytical and Simulation Models: T. Kim, C. Hegarty, B. El-Arini, M. Tran, S. Ericson, R. Conker, D. O´Laughlin, CAASD/The MITRE Corporation

Alternates
1. Correlation Structure of the Equatorial Ionosphere: S. Rajagopal, T. Walter, S. Datta-Barua, J. Blanch, Stanford University; T. Sakai, Electronic Navigation Research Institute
2. Evaluation of Ionospheric Interpolation Algorithms for Regional GPS Networks in Canada: Y. Moon, The University of Calgary, Canada

1. Code and Phase Multipath Characterization for Beam-Steering Receivers: R.J. Eggert, J.R. Gutierrez, J.F. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology
2. GPS Multipath Mitigation Assessment of Digital Beam Forming Antenna Technology in a JPALS Dual Frequency Smoothing Architecture: G.A. McGraw, R.S.Y. Young, K. Reichenauer, Rockwell Collins; J. Stevens, F. Ventrone, ARINC Engineering Services
3. System and Method for Forming a Beam and Creating Nulls with an Adaptive Array Antenna Using Antenna Excision and Orthogonal Eigen-Weighting: K.V. Cai, R.L. Hartman, Raytheon Company
4. Simplified Survey System: G.S. Graham, U.S. Army AMCOM; K. Peake, NTA, Inc.; J.W. Smith, CAS, Inc.
5. New Generation GPS and Radar Aided Inertial Navigation System for Ballistic Missile Interceptors: J. Anders, C. Bubar, V. Estrada, C. Johnson, R.S. Ornedo, Raytheon Systems Company
6. GPS Anomaly Resolution and the Satellite Reference Station (SRS): A.J. Chasko, D. Garay, Holloman AFB

Alternates
1. A Demonstration of Advanced Spinning Vehicle Navigation: J.H. Doty, D.A. Anderson, Rockwell Collins, Inc.; T.D. Bybee, Alliant Techsystems Inc.
2. Personal Navigation for the Warfighter: A. Kourepenis, S. Holmes, Draper Laboratory; H. Girolamo, M. Chandler, U.S. Army/Natick Soldier Center; S. Sokolowski, U.S. Army/CECOM
3. Evaluating Airborne Navigation Systems Using Commercial WADGPS Receivers: S.A. Wright, H.A. Klotz, Jr., The Boeing Company

1. High Accuracy Kinematic Spacecraft Relative Positioning Using Dual-Frequency GPS Carrier Phase Data: R. Kroes, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands; O. Montenbruck, German Space Operation Center, Germany
2. Simulated Positioning Performance of the JPL Mars Network Operating in Conjunction with the European Netlanders Mission: K. O´Keefe, G. Lachapelle, S. Skone, The University of Calgary, Canada
3. Architecture and Performance Testing of a Software GPS Receiver for Space-Based Applications: K.L. Gold, A.K. Brown, NAVSYS Corporation
4. A Miniature GPS Receiver for Precise Orbit Determination of the SUNSAT2004 Micro-Satellite: O. Montenbruck, German Space Operations Center, Germany; B. Nortier, Stellenbosch University, South Africa; S. Mostert, Sun Space and Information Systems (Pty) Ltd, South Africa
5. Improving Kinematic LEO POD with the Use of Space-Based and Ground-Based GPS Transceiver Constellation: Feasibility Study: D. Grejner-Brzezinska, C.-K. Hong, T.-S. Bae, Ohio State University
6. Analysis of the GLONASS and GPS Signals Availability at the GEO: S.V. Averin, A.A. Vinogradov, V.V. Dvorkin, Russian Institute of Space Device Engineering, Russia

Alternates
1. An Algorithm for Instantaneous Position Estimation of GPS Satellites in SBAS Applications: R. Gupta, A.S. Ganeshan, ISRO Satellite Centre, India
2. Fuzzy Logic Controller for Small Satellites Navigation: G. Della Pietra, S. Falzini, F. Palutan

1. GNSS Augmentation Systems in the Maritime Sector: M. Fairbanks, N. Ward, General Lighthouse Authorities, U.K.; M. Dumville, W. Roberts, V. Ashkenazi, Nottingham Scientific Ltd, U.K.
2. Novel Signal Designs for Improved Data Capacity from DGPS Radiobeacons: R. Hartnett, K. Gross, M. McKaughan, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; P. Enge, Stanford University; P. Swaszek, University of Rhode Island; G. Johnson, John J. McMullen Associates, Inc.; D. Wolfe, U.S.C.G. Command and Control Center
3. Cutting Edge Loran-C Technology to Support eLoran Requirements: W.J. Pelgrum, R. Kellenbach, A.W.S. Helwig, G.W.A. Offermans, D. van Willigen, Reelektronika, The Netherlands; E. Johannessen, Megapulse
4. Improvements of USCG RTK Performance Using External NOAA Tropospheric Corrections Integrated with a Multiple Reference Station Approach: P. Alves, Y. Ahn, J. Liu, G. Lachapelle, The University of Calgary, Canada; D. Wolfe, A. Cleveland, U.S. Coast Guard
5. Enhanced Loran for Maritime Harbor Entrance and Approach: B. Peterson, K. Dykstra, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning, LLC; J. Macaluso, K. Carroll, A. Hawes, U.S. Coast Guard Loran Support Unit; G.K. Weeks Jr., U.S. Coast Guard Command and Control Center
6. Field Measurements of dLoran for Harbor Entrance and Approach: A. Grebnev, E. Johannessen, Megapulse; W.J. Pelgrum, Reelektronika, The Netherlands

Alternates
1. DGPS Availability and Accuracy in a Harbor Area: G. Johnson, John J. McMullen Associates; R. Hartnett, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; P. Swaszek, University of Rhode Island
2. Enhanced Loran for Timing and Frequency: K. Carroll, U.S. Coast Guard Loran Support Unit; T. Celano, C. Biggs, Timing Solutions Inc.; G.K. Weeks Jr., U.S. Coast Guard Command and Control Center
3. Study on GPS Application to Draught Measuring System on Board: S. Okuda, Y. Arai, Marine Technical College, Japan

1. Ionospheric Electron Density Profiles from Single Frequency Tracking of Sounding Rockets: O. Montenbruck, M. Markgraf, German Space Operations Center, Germany; G. Schmitt, Kayser-Threde GmbH, Germany
2. Global Assimilative Modeling for GPS Ionospheric Correction and Prediction of Ionospheric Weather: X. Pi, G.A. Hajj, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology / University of Southern California; B.D. Wilson, A.J. Mannucci, L. Mandrake, B.A. Iijima, A. Komjathy, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology; C. Wang,
3. Estimations of Absolute SWD in Southern Alberta Area Using a Regional GPS Network and Water Vapor Radiometer: J.J. Park, Korea Astronomy Observatory, South Korea / The University of Calgary, Canada; S. Skone, M.E. Cannon, G. Lachapelle, The University of Calgary, Canada

Alternates
1. Availability Results of an SBAS in Brazil That Uses an Ionospheric Estimation Algorithm Relying on the Thin Shell Model: J. Blanch, M. Deland, T. Walter, P. Enge, Stanford University
2. Remote Sensing of PWV Using Ground-Based GPS Data in Wuhan Region: H. Zhang, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, P.R. China
3. Tropospheric Modelling for GPS Observations: M. Jafari, A.A. Ardalan, University of Tehran, Iran

1. Availability of CAT IIIB LAAS Augmented by Radar Altimeter Ranging: C.A. Shively, T.T. Hsiao, The MITRE Corporation/CAASD
2. Program for the Investigation of Airborne Multipath Errors: T. Murphy, R. Friedman, Boeing Commercial Airplanes; J. Booth, M. Harris, P. Geren, Boeing Phantom Works; N. Molloy, Boeing Air Traffic Management; B. Clark, J. Burns, T. Urda, Federal Aviation Administration
3. The High Resolution Aeronautical Multipath Navigation Channel: A. Steingass, A. Lehner, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany; F. Fontan, M.J. Martin, University of Vigo, Spain; E. Kubista, JOANNEUM RESEARCH, Austria; B. Arbesser-Rastburg, European Space Agency, The Netherlands
4. Definition, Testing, and Application of Instrument Landing System Critical Areas: L.N. Spohnheimer, Federal Aviation Administration; D.A. Quinet, M. Mowry, Ohio University Avionics Engineering Center
5. B-value Research for FAA LAAS Station Integrity and Fault Detection: H. Wen, J. Havlicek, J. Fagan, University of Oklahoma
6. Opportunities to Improve the Safety and Security of Airport Surface Movements at Airports Due to the WAAS Implementation: D. Damjanovic

Alternates
1. Measuring the Effect of Helicopter Rotors on GPS Reception: J.R.A. Stevens, ARINC Engineering Services; G.J. Brodin, J.A. Cooper, CAA Institute of Satellite Navigation, University of Leeds, UK
2. Use of IKONOS Stereo Imagery Collection and Multispectral Imagery Analysis to Reduce Risks from Man-Portable-Air-Defense-Systems (MANPADS) at Civil Airports: D. Damjanovic

1. Huber´s M-estimation in GPS Positioning: Computational Aspect: X.-W. Chang, Y. Guo, McGill University, Canada
2. A New Formulation and Solution to Navigation State Vector Estimation Problems: C. Shapiro
3. A Block Processing Carrier to Noise Ratio Estimator for the Global Positioning System: M. Sayre, Ohio University
4. Code and Carrier Phase Based GPS Positioning: Computational Aspect: X.W. Chang, C.C. Paige, L. Yin, McGill University, Canada
5. PRC Generation in Time-Latency: Is RRC Still Required Even if S/A Has Been Turned Off?: C. Kee, B. Park, J. Kim, S. Choi, GPS Lab, Seoul National University, Korea
6. A GPS Velocity Sensor: How Accurate Can It Be?: L. Serrano, D. Kim, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada; K. Itani, Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.; M. Ueno, Consultant

Alternates
1. A Design Technique to Remove the Correlation Ambiguity in Binary Offset Carrrier (BOC) Spread Spectrum Signals: P.W. Ward
2. Unsteady Aerodynamic Analysis Under Wind Shear Effect with EKF Method on FDR Data: C.-S. Ho, C.-T. Weng, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

1. New Generation of Integrated Radionavigation User Equipment: All Long Range Sensors Inside: I.B. Bedrin, I.K. Konarzhevsky, S.B. Pisarev, B.V. Shebshaevich, Russian Institute of Radionavigation and Time, Russia
2. Design and Simulation of a Pseudolite-Based Flight Reference System: T.J. Bouska, 746 Test Squadron, USAF; J. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology
3. Implementation of Deeply Integrated GPS/Low-Cost IMU for Acquisition and Tracking of Weak GPS Signals: A. Soloviev, F. van Graas, S. Gunawardena, Ohio University
4. INS and INS/GPS Accuracy Improvement Using Autoregressive (AR) Modeling of INS Sensor Errors: S. Nassar, K.-P. Schwarz, N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada
5. A Cost Effective Approach to Inertial Sensor Selection Combining Simulation and Empirical Analysis: V. Nadkarni, J. Peake, Trimble Navigation
6. Implementation of a Skewed-Redundant Low-Cost INS in a Fast-Prototyping Environment: R. Giroux, �cole de Technologie Superieure, Canada; S. Sukkarieh, M. Bryson, The University of Sydney, Australia

Alternates
1. An Efficient Method for Considering Time Correlated Noise in GPS/INS Integration: J. Wendel, G.F. Trommer, University of Karlsruhe, Germany
2. Data Fusion in Distributed Multi-Sensor System: H. Guo, Nanchang University, China; M. Yu, Jiangxi Normal University, China

1. ESTB Signal Survey Results in Rome and Athens Areas - A Detailed Assessment in INStANT: D. Vassiliadis, V. Varela, ALGOSYSTEMS S.A., Greece; A. Pistoni, NEXT Ingegneria dei Sistemi; P. Savino, M. Russo, LEAT S.r.I.
2. Urban Traffic Flow Prediction by Using GPS and Neural Networks Theory: A. Meneses, City Hall of Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal; I. Os¢rio, University of Porto, Portugal
3. Fuzzy Logic Based Map Matching Algorithm for Vehicle Navigation System in Urban Canyons: S. Syed, M.E. Cannon, The University of Calgary, Canada
4. Evaluating MMS Capabilities in GDF Road Representation: C. Palermo, Universit… degli Studi di Trieste, Italy
5. Dynamic Surface Response of a Local Area Induced by Chi-Chi Earthquake Using Accelerograph and GPS Solutions: C.-S. Ho, C.-F. Lee, J.-Y. Yu, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan; J.-H. Tsai, Central Weather Bureau, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan
6. Real-Time GPS Differentiation Through the 2.5G/3G Mobile Communication Media: A Case Study Using GPRS: S.A. Haidar, S.S. Saab, D.M. Issa, A.A. Zein, Lebanese American University

1. GPS Jamming Environment Prediction Based on Discrete Data Sampling: J. Fitch, Advanced Information Engineering Services, A General Dynamics Company
2. Trial Results of a Prototype System to Locate GPS Radio Interference Sources Using Time- and Frequency-Difference-of-Arrival Measurements: S. Shemar, G. Bond, P. Edmonds, S. Harding, QinetiQ, U.K.
3. A Portable UWB to GPS Emission Simulator : P. Dafesh, P. Hanson, R. Yowell, The Aerospace Corporation; T. Stansell, Consultant to the Aerospace Corporation; D. Alcocer, United States Air Force
4. Spectrum Implications for the Use of L2C for Aviation: D.J. Chadwick, The MITRE Corporation
5. GPS L5 and GALILEO E5a/E5b Signal-to-Noise Density Ratio Degradation Due to DME/TACAN Signals: Simulations and Theoretical Derivation: F. Bastide, ENAC/STNA, France; E. Chatre, Galileo Joint Undertaking, France; C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; B. Roturier, STNA, France
6. Pulsed RFI Effects on Aviation Operations Using GPS L5: R.J. Erlandson, Consultant; T. Kim, C. Hegarty, The MITRE Corporation; A.J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems

Alternates
1. Low Cost, Demonstrated Effective GPS-AJ: R.S. Littlepage, Sr., LFinc
2. Interference Effects on GPS Signal Acquisition: S. Deshpande, E. Cannon, The University of Calgary, Canada
3. Wideband and Narrowband Interference Suppression Technique Integration: M.W. Rosen, R.J. Wilson, ERI

1. GPS-IMU-Loran Integration for Airborne Applications: D.A. Anderson, J.H. Doty, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
2. Statistical and Spectral Analysis of Data from Helicopter Flight Tests Using GPS Lateral Guidance and Barometric Vertical Navigation: D.P. Stapleton, Innovative Solutions International, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center
3. Tightly Coupled GPS/INS/CCD Integration Based on GPS Carrier Phase Velocity in Complementary Form: S. Moafipoor, D. Grejner-Brzezinska, C.K. Toth, Ohio State University
4. Kinematic Azimuth Alignment of INS Using GPS Velocity Information: A. Salycheva, E. Cannon, The University of Calgary, Canada
5. Collaborative GPS/INS Navigation in Urban Environment: F. Berefelt, B. Boberg, J. Nyg†rds, P. Str”mb„ck, Swedish Defence Research Agency,
Sweden
6. Integration of GPS and INS Using Float Ambiguities with Application to Precise Positioning for JPALS: M.G. Petovello, M.E. Cannon, G. Lachapelle, The University of Calgary, Canada

Alternate
1. Non-Linear Navigation Architecture of Integrated GPS/INS for Autonomous or Remote-Pilot Vehicles: C.-Y. King, Taiwan