1. CRPA DF Test Bed Development and Testing: X. Yu, A. Morrison, SAIC; I. Weiss, Aerospace Corporation; M. Fitzgibbons, The MITRE Corporation
2. Home on & Geo-Location of GPS Jammers: C. New, M. Marino, AFRL Munitions Directorate
3. Miniature Navigator Demonstration (MIND): P.D. Norris, T.D. Jones, AFRL Munitions Directorate
4. GB-GRAM UAV Testing: M.W. Alsleben, S.R. Smeester, 746 Test Squadron
5. Phase Center & Group Delay Effects in the F-35 JSF GPS CRPA: J. Maenpa, J. Fleming, Raytheon - Space and Airborne Systems
6. Novel Multipath Mitigation Methods for Ultra-tightly Coupled GNSS/INS Systems: S. Draganov, L. Haas, Argon ST
7. UAV Flight Test Results of a GPS Anti-Jam Horizon Ring Nulling Antenna: K.F. McDonald, B. Rama Rao, E. Rosario, R. Davis, The MITRE Corporation; J. Hebert, JNWC; C. Rondeau, 746th TS; S. Littleton, 586 Flight TS, New Mexico State University
8. Eleven Element Beam Steering GPS Antenna Array in a GAS-1 CRPA Footprint: B. Rama Rao, E.N. Rosario, R.J. Davis, The MITRE Corporation

Alternates
1. Automation of Guidance Data Collection and Parsing: M.F. Steele, J. Javurek-Humig, 746 Test Squadron
2. Flying with STARS: J.A. Shockley, R.S. Lawrence, 746th Test Squadron

1:50. GPS Interference Testing and Current Modeling and Simulation Accuracy: D.J. Healey, Overlook Systems Technologies LLC./JNWC; M. Shike, SAIC/JNWC
2:12. Multipath Mitigation Algorithm Results Using TOA Beacons for Integrated Indoor Navigation: Alison Brown, B. Mathews, NAVSYS Corporation
2:35. Towards Real-Time, High-Accuracy Military GPS Positioning : A.G. Evans, J.P. Cunningham, A.W. Sutter, NSWCDD; O.L. Colombo, GEST/NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
2:58. Increasing Location Accuracy with Network Augmented GPS for Mine Countermeasures: A. Brown, J. Dalrymple, R. Tredway, NAVSYS Corporation; A.G. Evans, Naval Surface Warfare Center
4:00. Modernized GPS Inter-Signal-Corrections (ISCs)and Their Effect on the GPS Error Budget Over the Greater Terrestrial Volume: A. Tetewsky, J. Anszperger, N. Vaughn, P. Perkins, J. Lozow, Draper Laboratory; J. Ross, The MITRE Corporation
4:23. Peace-time Interference to GPS Receivers on Geostationary Satellites: L. Cooper, G. Gallien, C. Smith, K. Hollison, The Aerospace Corporation
4:46. GPS Operational Control System Architecture Evolution: J. Doucet, USAF; R. Gaede, The Boeing Company; B. Besch, L. Kennedy, Lockheed Martin
5:08. Accuracy Improvement Candidates for Worldwide GPS Services: P. Mendicki, C. Harris, The Aerospace Corporation; J. Taylor, Boeing Services Company; T. Bender, M.B. Mathon, A. Dorsey, Lockheed Martin

8:35. Reduced Inertial Sensor System (RISS)/GPS Integration using Particle Filtering for Land Vehicles: J. Georgy, U. Iqbal, M. Bayoumi, Queen´s University, Canada; A. Noureldin, Royal Military College/Queen´s University, Canada
8:57. On-line Tuning of an Extended Kalman Filter for INS/GPS Navigation Applications: C. Goodall, N. El-Sheimy, Z. Syed, The University of Calgary, Canada
9:20. Flight Testing and Data Evaluation of MEMS INS/GPS Hybridisation Filters - First Results: M. Steen, P.M. Schachtebeck, R. Plate, P. Hecker, Institute of Flight Guidance, TU-BS, Germany; S. Monrocq, Thales Avionics, France
9:43. Development of a Frequency Response INS/GPS System Model Based on LSSA for Bridging GPS Outage: M. El-Diasty, S. Pagiatakis, York University, Canda
10:40. Cycle Slip Detection and Fixing by MEMS IMU/GPS Integration for Mobile Environment RTK-GPS: T. Takasu, A. Yasuda, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan
11:03. Performance Improvement of Integrated MEMS/GNSS Systems: J-R. De Boer, V. Calmettes, J-Y. Tourneret, Universite de Toulouse, France; B. Lesot, Thales Avionics, France
11:26. Novel Positioning Algorithms for RFID Assisted 2D MEMS INS System: M. Zhu, RMIT University, Australia
11:48. Tight-integration of MEMs Dead-Reckoning and GPS: R. Zanutta, F. van Diggelen, Global Locate, Inc.

Alternate
1. Error Analysis for a Miniature MEMS/GPS Tracking System for Different Types of Movement: H.T. Luinge, P. Makoto Slycke, Xsens Technologies B.V., The Netherlands

8:35. Enhancements of the Range Consensus Algorithm (RANCO): G. Schroth, M. Rippl, German Aerospace Center, Germany; A. Ene, J. Blanch, Stanford University; B. Belabbas, German Aerospace Center, Germay; T. Walter, P. Enge, Stanford University; M. Meurer, German Aerospace Center, Germany
8:57. Influence of GNSS Integrity Monitoring on Single and Multiple Fault Event Probabilities: J. Rife, Tufts University
9:20. A Sensitivity-based Method for Fault Detection and Identification: Y. Wu, Wuhan University, China; J. Wang, University of New South Wales, Australia
9:43. Multi-Constellation RAIM for Simultaneous Double-Fault Satellite Scenarios: M. Zhang, J. Zhang, Y. Qin, Beihang University, China
10:40. Evaluation of a Novel GNSS Multi-system Integrity Algorithm: P.F. Silva, J.F.M. Lorga, M. Marcote, N. Schaeffer, Deimos, Portugal
11:03. RAIM Performance in the Post SA Era: T. Murphy, M. Harris, Boeing Commercial Airplanes
11:26. Satellite Navigation Integrity Assurance: Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina: S. Pullen, Stanford University
11:48. A New Method for Detection, Identification and Mitigation of Outliers in Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM): H. Isshiki, University of Ulsan, South Korea

8:35. Signal Compression for an Efficient and Simplified GNSS Signal Parallel Acquisition: M. Nicola, A. Nordio, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; M. Fantino, M. Pini, P. Mulassano, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy
8:57. Direct P(Y)/M-code Acquisition Based on Time-frequency Folding Technique: H. Li, M. Lu, Z. Feng, Tsinghua University , China
9:20. Reduced Complexity Circuits for Serial Code Phase Search Acquisition: G. Girau, L. Lo Presti, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; M. Fantino, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy
9:43. Bayesian Direct Position Estimation: P. Closas, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain; C. Fernandez-Prades, Centre Tecnologic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya, Spain; D. Bernal, J.A. Fernandez-Rubio, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain
10:40. Noise Floor Independent Delay Lock Loop Discriminator: G. Xie, X. Yuan, SiRF Technology, Inc.
11:03. GNSS Receiver with Vector Based FLL-Assisted PLL Carrier Tracking Loop: S. Kiesel, C. Ascher, D. Gramm, G.F. Trommer, Universitaet Karlsruhe, Germany
11:26. HOTSTART EVERY TIME - Compute the Ephemeris on the Mobile: P.G. Mattos, ST Microelectronics R&D Ltd., UK
11:48. A Dynamic Satellite Search Scheduling for GNSS Super Constellation: K-T. Chen, MediaTek Inc., Taiwan

Alternates
1. Block Correlator for Tracking GNSS Signals: P.K. Sagiraju, D. Akopian, The University of Texas at San Antonio
2. Pull-out Probability and Tracking Threshold Analysis for High Dynamics GNSS Carrier Loops: P.A. Roncagliolo, J.G. Garcia, C.H. Muravchik, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
3. Filtering IF Samples to Reduce the Computational Load of Frequency Domain Acquisition in GNSS Receivers: S.U. Qaisar, N.C. Shivaramaiah, A.G. Dempster, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia

8:35. The Study of Typhoon Path in Taiwan Region using Precise Point Positioning Technique: W-C. Peng ,Y-H. Li, K-W. Chiang, M. Yang, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
8:57. Troposphere Modeling for Precise GPS Rapid-Static Positioning in Mountainous Areas: P. Wielgosz, S. Cellmer, Z. Rzepecka, University of Warmia and Mazury , Poland; D.A. Grejner-Brzezinska, The Ohio State University
9:20. Estimation of Troposphere Decorrelation Using the Combined Zenith-dependent Parameter: Y-W. Ahn, D. Kim, P. Dare, University of New Brunswick, Canada; J. Park, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, South Korea
9:43. Assessing Space-based GNSS Technology for Meteorological Studies in Australia: E. Fu, RMIT University, Australia
10:40. Real-Time Detection of Ionospheric Scintillations and Potential Applications: I. Rodriguez, C. Hernandez, A. Curiel, C. Catalan, L. Fernandez, E. Sardon, GMV, Spain
11:03. Diffraction Tomography of the Disturbed Ionosphere Based on GPS Scintillation Data: M.L. Psiaki, Cornell University; G. Bust, ASTRA Space; A.P. Cerruti, P.M. Kintner, Jr., S.P. Powell, Cornell University
11:26. Evaluating GPS Receiver Robustness to Ionospheric Scintillation: J. Hinks, T. Humphreys, B. O´Hanlon, M.L. Psiaki, P.M. Kintner, Jr., Cornell University
11:48. Spatial and Temporal Study of Ionospheric Scintillations, TEC Depletion and its Effect on GPS Availability Over Indian Region: S.M. Regar, Airports Authority of India, India; P.V. Khekale, A. Sukla, R. Acharaya, S. Das, Space Applications Centre, India; S. Sunda, S. Srivastava, Airports Authority India, India

Alternates
1. The MIM (Minimum Ionospheric Model) Project Where GNSS and Radio Astronomy Collide: E. Noordam, Royal Netherlands Navy, The Netherlands
2. Short-term Ionospheric TEC Prediction Model for Precise GNSS Positioning: A. Krankowski, University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland; I.I. Shagimuratov, WD IZMIRAN, Russia; P. Wielgosz, University of Warmia and Mazury , Poland
3. Techniques for Improved Measurement of TEC with GPS: L.P. Dyrud, A. Jovancevic, Andrew Brown, Center for Remote Sensing Inc.; B. Wilson, NASA Jet Propusion Laboratory
4. GPS Relative Positioning with Stochastic Estimation of Double Difference Ionospheric Residuals: H.A. Marques, J.F. Galera Monico, H. Alves da Silva, Sao Paulo State University, Brazil;
M. Aquino, University of Nottingham, UK

8:35. Real-Time, Wide-Area, Precise Kinematic Positioning Using Data from Internet NTRIP Streams: O.L. Colombo, GEST/NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
8:57. Incorporation of Network Information in Multiple GNSS Processing Environment: H-J. Euler, inPosition GmbH, Switzerland; J. Wirth, Hochschule fuer Technik Rapperswil, Switzerland
9:20. The Relationship Between Network RTK Solutions MAC, VRS, IMAX and FKP: F. Takac, O. Zelzer, Leica Geosystems AG, Switzerland
9:43. User Terminal/Local Element System for Network Based Positioning using RTK/EGNOS in Urban Environment: G. Marucco, C. Porporato, M. De Agostino, A.M. Manzino, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; F. Dominici, A. Defina, K. Charqane, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy
10:40. Transferring Ambiguity Levels Between Network Corrections: P. Alves, Leica Geosystems AG , Switzerland
11:03. Algorithms to Calibrate and Compensate for GLONASS Biases in GNSS RTK Receivers Working with 3rd Party Networks: A. Boriskin, G. Zyryanov, MagellanGPS, Russia
11:26. Toward the Ultimate RTK: The Last Challenges in Long-Range Real-Time Kinematic Applications: D. Kim, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada
11:48. Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution In Real-Time: L. Mervart, Z. Lukes, C. Rocken, GPS Solutions Inc.

Alternates
1. Investigating the Impact of the Commercial GSM/GPRS Communications on the Availability of the Network RTK GNSS Service: J. Aponte, X. Meng, T. Moore, C. Hill, The University of Nottingham, UK; M. Burbidge, Leica Geosystems Ltd., UK
2. Temporal and Spatial Decorrelation Error Reduction by a Combination of Compact RTK with Master-Auxiliary Concept: B. Park, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea

This session provides an update on satellite-based navigation systems in operation or under development. A representative for each system will provide a system overview, summarize current or planned characteristics and performance, report recent programmatic events, update schedule and plans, and summarize ongoing interactions with other service providers. Questions from the audience are encouraged.

1. GPS Program Update: Col. David W. Madden, Commander, Global Systems Wing,USAF
2. GLONASS Program Update: Dr. Sergey Revnivykh, Deputy Director General, Central Research Institute of Machine Building and Head of PNT Information Analysis Center, Federal Space Agency, Russia
3. Galileo Program Update: Mr. Marco Falcone, Galileo System and Operations Manager, Navigation Department, European Space Agency, France
4. QZSS Program Update: Mr. Koji Terada, Project Manager, Quazi-Zenith Satellite System, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Japan

1:50. Modeling and Analysis of Measurement Time Synchronization Error in Transfer Alignment: C-J. Kim, H.S. Kim, H. won, Park, ADD, South Korea
2:12. Wireless Localization and Navigation with the Signal of Opportunity by Exploiting Doppler Frequency: S.K. Balaga, H. Xu, L. Yang, University of Florida
2:35. Vehicle Dynamic Model-aided Inertial Navigation System for Micro Aerial Vehicle Application: D. Gebre-Egziabher, N. Dadkhah, B. Mettler, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
2:58. Rapid Initialization of SINS for land Vehicle-based Vertically-launched Missiles: Z. Xu, Southeast University , China/University of New South Wales, Australia; Y. Li, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia; X. Xu, Southeast University, China

1:50. Precise Time Transfer and Ranging Experiment using ETS-VIII Satellite: Y. Takahashi, F. Nakagawa, H. Kunimori, J. Amagai, S. Tsuchiya, R. Tabuchi, S. Hama, NICT, Japan; H. Noda, JAXA, Japan
2:12. Ultra-stable Oscillators: Limits of GNSS Coherent Integration: P.O. Gaggero, University of Neuchatel, Switzerland; D. Borio, University of Calgary, Canada
2:35. A Picosecond Accuracy Timing System Based on L1-only GNSS Receivers for a Large Aperture Array Radar: G. Stenberg, T. Lindgren, J. Johansson, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden
2:58. Real-time Clock Estimation for Precise Orbit Determination of LEO-Satellites: A. Hauschild, O. Montenbruck, DLR, German Space Operations Center, Germany

Alternate
1. Precise Timing using a High Sensitivity Receiver in Indoor Environments: E. Anyaegbu, J.P. Bickerstaff, G. Whitworth, NXP Semiconductors (GPS) UK Ltd., UK

1:50. Differences in Multipath Propagation Between Urban and Suburban Environments: A. Steingass, A. Lehner, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany
2:12. Impact of Near-Field Effects on the GNSS Position Solution: F. Dilssner, Logica, Germany; G. Seeber, Universitat Hannover, Germany; G. Wubbena, M. Schmitz, Geo++ GmbH, Germany
2:35. A New Wavelet-Based Multipath Mitigation Technique: M. Elhabiby, A. Elghazouly, N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada
2:58. Performance of GNSS Time of Arrival Estimation Techniques in Multipath Environments: A. Broumandan, T. Lin, University of Calgary, Canada
4:00. Particle Filtering Strategies for Efficient Multipath Mitigation: P. Closas, Technical University of Catalunya, Spain; C. Fernandez-Prades, Centre Tecnologic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya, Spain; J. A. Fernandez-Rubio, D. Bernal, Technical University of Catalunya, Spain
4:23. BOC/MBOC Multicorrelator Receiver with Least-Squares Multipath Mitigation Technique: F.D. Nunes, Instituto de Telecomunicacoes and Instituto Superior Tecnico, Portugal; F.M. G. Sousa, Instituto de Telecomunicacoes and Instituto Superior de Engenharia, Porgutal; J.M.N. Leitao, Instituto de Telecomunicacoes and Instituto Superior Tecnico,
4:46. Demonstration of Synthetic Phased Array Antenna for Carrier/Code Multipath Mitigation: T. Pany, B. Eissfeller, University FAF Munich, Germany
5:08. Analysis of Early Late Phase for Multipath Mitigation: O.M. Mubarak, The University of New South Wales, Australia

Alternates
1. A Geometrical Approach for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Multipath: N. Blanco-Delgado, F.D. Nunes. J.M.F. Xavier, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Portugal
2. GPS Multipath Parameterization using the Extended Kalman Filter and a Dual LHCP/RHCP Antenna: A. Izadpanah , C. O´Driscoll , G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada
3. Dynamic Estimation of the Number of Multipath Signals Using Singular Value Decomposition: M. Brenneman, J. Morton, Miami University
4. Multipath Mitigation of GPS Signals and a C-A Code Conversion Technique for Efficient Computation: T. Nagano, T. Iwamoto, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan

1:50. A Demonstration of L2C Tracking from Space for Atmospheric Occultations: T.K. Meehan, C. Ao, D. Robison, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cailfornia Institute of Technology; D. Hunt, C. Rocken, S. Sokolovskiy, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
2:12. Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission Inter-satellite Ranging and Alarm System Testing and Preliminary Results: L.B. Winternitz, G.W. Heckler, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; W.A. Bamford, Emergent Space Tech
2:35. Next Space-VLBI Mission, VSOP-2, and the Precise Orbit Determination with GNSS Navigation and SLR: Y. Asaki, ISAS, Japan; H. Takeuchi, M. Yoshikawa, ISAS/JAXA, Japan
2:58. Lessons Learned from the use of GPS in Space; Application to the Orbital use of GALILEO: J-L. Issler, A. DeLatour, L. Ries, M. Grondin, CNES, France
4:00. First Spaceborne Demonstration of Galileo Signals for GNSS Reflectometry: P.J. Jales, R.M. Weiler, C. Underwood, Surrey Space Centre, UK; M. Unwin, Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd, UK
4:23. Integer Ambiguity Free Attitude Determination from GNSS Carrier Phase Double Differences by Means of a Hyper-Dome Quaternion Search Grid: R.V.F. Lopes, H.K. Kuga, A.R. da Silva, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Brazil
4:46. Zero-difference Ambiguity Fixing for Spaceborne GPS Receivers: D. Laurichesse, F. Mercier, J-P. Berthias, P. Broca, L. Cerri, CNES, France
5:08. Test Results From a Precise Positioning and Attitude Determination System for Microsatellites Using a Software Defined Radio: Alison Brown, P. Brown, B. Mathews, NAVSYS Corporation; G. Hegemann, Microsat Inc.

Alternates
1. Nonlinear Fixed-Point Smoothers and Their Application for GPS Orbit Determination: C. Yang, Sigtem Technology, Inc.; T. Nguyen, M. Miller, Air Force Research Laboratory
2. Improved Orbit Estimation using GPS Measurements for Conjunction Analysis: A.R. Muldoon, G.H. Elkaim, UC Santa Cruz
3. Cost Effective & Innovative Approach to Recover from Data Corruptions Due to Radiation Effects in GPS Receivers in Leo-Orbits: B.N. Raghothama, Accord Software & Systems Pvt. Ltd., India

1:50. Development and Field-Testing of a GPS-Based Mountain Pass Road Opening Driver Assistance System: K.S. Yen, M.T. Darter, T.A. Lasky, B. Ravani, University of California - Davis
2:12. Yardbot: Design and Implementation of a Robotic Lawnmower: B. Birkmire, K.S. Rattan, S. Thomas, J. Gallagher, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Wright State University
2:35. Mini-Urban Challenge: C. New, C. Miller, Air Force Research Laboratory
2:58. Adaptive Sensing for Improving Detection of Unexploded Ordnances with a Sigma-Point Information Filter: A.Y. Chen, Stanford University
4:00. Mitigating Geomagnetic Noise in Airborne Magnetic Surveys using GPS: S. Skone, University of Calgary, Canada
4:23. A New GPS-Enhanced High Resolution Weather Service: T. Iwabuchi, C. Rocken, GPS Solutions Inc.
4:46. Energy Scavenging and Aerodynamic Performance of a Rigid Wing Propulsion System for an Autonomous Surface Vessel: G.H. Elkaim, UC Santa Cruz; C.O. Lee Boyce, Stanford University
5:08. Characterization of GPS Time Synchronization Error of Medium-format Low-cost Digital Camera System: Y.O. Kaddoura, A.H. Mohamed, University of Florida

Alternates
1. Cooperative LBS for Secure Transport System: A. Tomatis, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; G. Pau, University of California, Los Angeles; P. Mulassano, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy; F. Dovis, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
2. Micro-Navigation Satellite Network Design and Analysis: B. Kang, J-H. Lee, C-H. Won, Temple University

1:50. A Triple Estimating Receiver of Multiplexed Binary Offset Carrier(MBOC) Modulated Signals: M.S. Hodgart, University of Surrey, UK; M. Unwin, Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd ., UK
2:12. Revised PRN Code Structures for Galileo E1OS - Interplex Optimization and a New Analytically Derived Code Family: S. Wallner, J.A. Avila-Rodriguez, G.W. Hein, J-L. Issler, University FAF Munich, Germany
2:35. An Interference Impact Assessment Model for GNSS Signals: B. Motella, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy; S. Savasta, F. Dovis, D. Margaria, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
2:58. GNSS Off Line Signal Quality Assessment: M. Soellner, C. Kurzhals, EADS Astrium; Germany; M. Rapisarda, T. Burger, European Space Agency
4:00. Compatibility Analysis of Galileo E1 Signals with Radio Astronomy: O. Julien, Ecole Nationale de l´Aviation Civile, France; J-L. Issler, Centre Nationale d´Etudes Spatiales, France
4:23. Interference Effects on Galileo E5b and E6 Frequencies by Using the Galileo Test and Development Environment GATE: G. Heinrichs, E. Lohnert, E. Wittmann, T. Luck, M. Bodenbach, IFEN GmbH, Germany
4:46. Galileo Baseline Tuning to Enable System Certification & Accreditation: H.L. Trautenberg, J. Krueger, H. Frankenberger, K. Strodl, J. Daubrawa, EADS Astrium, Germany; C. Ruf, Thales ATM; V. Oehler, EADS Astrium, Germany
5:08. Galileo Signal Fading in an Indoor Environment: A. Teuber, M. Paonni, V. Kropp, G.W. Hein, University FAF Munich, Germany

Alternates
1. C-Band User Terminal Concepts and Acquisition Performance Analysis for European GNSS Evolution Programme: J-H. Won, B. Eissfeller, University FAF Munich, Germany; A. Schmitz-Peiffer, EADS-Astrium, Germany; E. Colzi, ESA-ESTEC, Netherlands
2. AltBOC for Dummies or Everything You Always Wanted To Know About AltBOC: G. Artaud, L. Lestarquit, L. Ries, T. Grelier, J-L Issler, A. De Latour, J. Dantepal, CNES, France
3. GPS-GALILEO, Urban Interoperability Performance with the GPS-GALILEO Time Offset: B. Bonhoure, I. Vanschoenbeek, M. Boschetti, J. Legenne, CNES, France
4. Consequences of MBOC Approximation by BOC Modulation: F. Macchi, M.G. Petovello, G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada
5. Early Galileo System Performance Verification: V.Oehler, D.Holding, J. Krueger, EADS Astrium GmbH, Germany; C. Ruf, Thales ATM, Germany

This panel examines GNSS-based systems that are designed to provide assured integrity. Assured integrity means that a system can be used in safety critical applications such as guiding aircraft to within hundreds of feet of the ground. Some of these systems are already in operation, others are nearly so. This session is intended to provide current status on each system as well future plans. The operations enabled by each system will be provided, both in the near and long term. Insight will be given on the difficulty of providing assured integrity and how these systems differ from both conventional navigational aids and conventional differential GPS. Questions from the audience are encouraged.

1. Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS): Mr. Carlos Rodriguez, Federal Aviation Administration
2. Wide Area Augmentation Systems (WAAS): Ms. Deborah Lawrence, Federal Aviation Administration
3. MTSAT Satellite-based Augmentation System (MSAS), Japan: Mr. Hideki Manabe, JCAB, Japan
4. European Geo-stationary Navigation Overlay Systems (EGNOS): Dr. Didier Flament, European Space Agency, France; Mr. Cedric Seynat, European GNSS Supervisory Authority (GSA), Belgium
6. GPS Evolutionary Architect Study: Dr. Per Enge, Stanford University

8:35. EUROCONTROL Policy on GNSS: F. Salabert, A. Hendriks, R. Rawlings, R. Farnworth, EUROCONTROL, Belgium
8:57. Availability of GNSS Performance to Support ADS-B : M. Harris, T. Murphy, Boeing Commercial Airplanes
9:20. EGNOS ATC: A Prototype for the Generation of Notam for European SBAS Flight Procedures: M.D.R. Mota, J. Cegarra Bautista, D. Zapata Arenas, J.M. Bermudez, GMV, Spain; E.J. Gonzalez, AENA, Spain
9:43. Performance of a Tightly Coupled GPS/INS Navigation System for Aviation Application under Ionospheric Scintillation: T-Y. Chiou, J. Seo, T. Walter, P. Enge, Stanford University

Alternate
1. Ionospheric Error Estimation in a Degraded Single Frequency Mode for Civil Aviation: C. Ouzeau, TeSA/ENAC/DTI, France; C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; B. Roturier, DSNA-DTI, France; M. Mabilleau, Sofreavia, France; J. Levan, F. Besse, ENAC, France

8:35. Near Real-Time Geo-Referenced UAV Imagery Collection and Web-Based Processing on a Server for Targeting and Mapping: Alison Brown, B. Bockius, D. Wetlesen, J. Dalrymple, NAVSYS Corporation
8:57. Estimation of Small UAS Angle of Attack and Angle of Sideslip Under High Dynamics: J. Perry, A.H. Mohamed, University of Florida
9:20. Fully Automatic Taxiing, Takeoff and Landing of a UAV Only with a Single-Antenna GPS Receiver: A. Cho, J. Kim, N. Park, D. Kim, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea
9:43. Collision Risk Model for Navy UCAS ATC Using Cooperative GPS/INS Surveillance: S. Toussaint, M. Germain, K. Wallace, I. Gallimore, Coherent Technical Services Inc.

Alternate
1. Performance Evaluation of Low Cost Multi-Antenna GPS/INS for Small UAVs: R. Hirokawa, R. Ohata, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan; T. Suzuki, Waseda University, Japan; T. Ebinuma, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan

8:35. Smart Positioning with Fastrax´s Software GPS Receiver Solution: S. Soderholm, T. Jokitalo, K. Kaisti, H. Kuusniemi, S. Kakarlapudi, H. Naukkarinen, Fastrax, Finland
8:57. A Single Die GPS, with Indoor Sensitivity - The NXP GNS7560: T. Haddrell, J.P. Bickerstaff, M. Conta, NXP Semiconductors (GPS) UK Ltd., UK
9:20. Nexteq RT30 L1 GPS Receiver for Autonomous Precise Positioning: Y. Zhang, S. Lee, Nexteq Navigation Corporation, Canada
9:43. Galileo Receiver Testing with the GNSS Signal Generator NSG 5100: S. Martin, S. Diefenbach, D. Felbach, M. v. Voithenberg, EADS Astrium GmbH, Germany
10:40. A Versatile Solution for Testing GPS/Inertial Navigation Systems: N. Fedora, Spirent Federal Systems Inc.; Boulton, C. Ford, Spirent Communications plc, UK
11:03. Performance Evaluation of the Multi-Constellation and Multi-Frequency GNSS RF Navigation Constellation Simulator NavXr-NCS: G. Heinrichs, M. Irsigler, R. Wolf, IFEN, GmbH, Germany; G. Prokoph, Work Microwave GmbH, Germany
11:26. magicGNSS: Precise GNSS Products Out of the Box: A. Mozo-Garcia, R. Piriz, P. Navarro, GMV, Spain
11:48. APPS: The Automatic Precise Positioning Service from JPL´s Global Differential GPS (GDGPS) System: Y. Bar-Sever, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Alternates
1. Galileo Performance Analysis Software for Test User Receivers: S. Romero, J. Diez, A. Fernandez , Deimos Space, Spain; A. Van der Berg, M. Simsky, K. Van Wassenhove, Septentrio, Belgium; R. Morgan-Owen, M. Hollreiser, ESA, The Netherlands
2. GPStream: A Low Bandwidth Architecture to Deliver or Autonomously Generate Predicted Ephemeris: E. Derbez, R. Lee, RX Networks Inc., Canada
3. Continuous GNSS Performance Monitoring, Prediction and Information Services via GalTeC: W. Ehret, E. Kubitz, H. Su, O. Glaser, Thales, Germany; E. Blomenhofer, NavPos Systems, Germany

8:35. New Approach for Integer Ambiguity Resolution using Interval Analysis: E-J. van Kampen, E. de Weerdt, Q.P. Chu, J.A. Mulder, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
8:57. Enhanced Integer Bootstrapping for Single Frequency GPS Attitude Determination: J.T. Pinchin, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
9:20. Optimization of a Position Comparison Relative RAIM Method: Y.C. Lee, The MITRE Corporation/CAASD
9:43. Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution using the Decoupled Clock Model: P. Collins, F. Lahaye, P. Heroux, Natural Resources Canada; S. Bisnath, York University, Canada
10:40. Optimising the Algorithm Design for High-integrity Relative Navigation using Carrier-phase Relative GPS Integrated with INS: P.D. Groves, C.R. Offer, C.J. Mather, G.W. Pulford, I.A. Ashokaraj, A.A. Macaulay,
QinetiQ, UK
11:03. New Approaches to IMU Modelling and INS/GPS Integration for UAV-based Earth-Observation: M. Wis, M.E. Pares, P. Molina, M. Blazquez, I. Colomina, J.C. Tatjer, Institute of Geomatics, Spain
11:26. INS/GPS Integration Using Gaussian Sum Particle Filter: Y. Kubo, Ritsumeikan University Japan; J. Wang, University of New South Wales, Australia
11:48. A Robust Filtering Scheme for Attitude/Rate Estimation with GNSS Signals: J.G. Garcia, P.A. Roncagliolo, C.H. Muravchik, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina

Alternates
1. A Time-relative Approach for Precise Positioning with a Miniaturized L1 GPS Logger: J. Traugott, Institute of Flight System Dynamics, Germany; G. Dell´Omo, Technosmart, Italy; A. Vyssotski, University Zurich-Irchel, Switzerland; G. Sachs, Institute of Flight System Dynamics, Germany
2. Application of Bayesian Model Selection to GPS Bit Synchronization: F. Pisoni, J. Brenner, F. Spalla, A. Genghi, Nemerix SA, Switzerland
3. Integrity Monitoring of GPS Carrier Phase Measurements using Particle Filtering: E. Lee, M.B. Heo, G.W. Nam, KARI, South Korea; Y.J. Lee, Konkuk University, South Korea

8:35. Improving user Experience in Assisted Land Navigation using Sub-optimal Sensor Configuration Installed on a Cell Phone: G. Dutta, H. Mullur, J.C. Roh, S. Rao, S. Hosur, Texas Instruments, India
8:57. Twin IMU-HSGPS Integration for Pedestrian Navigation: J. Bancroft, G. Lachapelle, M.E. Cannon, M. Petovello, University of Calgary, Canada
9:20. GNSS Aided In Situ Human Kinematics Studies During Running: S. Kwakkel, G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada
9:43. A Solution for Combined GPS/GLONASS Navigation in Conditions of Limited Satellite Visibility: C-S. Cai, University of Calgary, Canada
10:40. Instantaneous RTK Positioning Based on User Velocity Measurements: N. Kubo, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan; S. Pullen, Stanford University
11:03. A Hybrid System for Navigation in GPS-challenged Environments: Case Study: C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia; D.A. Grejner-Brzezinska, C.K. Toth, The Ohio State University; A. Dempster, Y. Li, N. Politi, J. Barnes, University of New South Wales, Australia
11:26. Precise Point Positioning with Single-Frequency Mass Market Receivers: A. Somieski, E. Favey, C. Burgi, u-blox AG, Switzerland
11:48. The Usefulness of Internet-based (NTrip) RTK for Navigation and Intelligent Transportation Systems: M. Uradzinski, University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland; D. Kim, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada

Alternates
1. A Zonal Regional Augmentation System Applying on Railway and Inland Waterway: W. Zhipeng, Z. Jun, L. Qiang, Beihang University, China
2. Performance of Hourly Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution: J. Geng, X. Meng, F.N. Teferle, A.H. Dodson, University of Nottingham, UK; M. Ge, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany; C. Shi, J. Liu, GNSS Centre, China
3. Real Time Centimeter/Decimeter Accuracy without Differential Corrections: When and How it is Possible?: D. Ivanov, V. Morgoon, D. Ponomarev, G. Zyryanov, MagellanGPS, Russia
4. Quality Assessment of DTM Generated from RTK GPS Data on Area with Various Sky Views: D. Atunggal, B.K. Cahyono, A.N. Matori, University of Technology PETRONAS, Malaysia

8:35. GALANT - Architecture Design and First Results of A Novel Galileo Navigation Receiver Demonstrator With Array Antennas: M. Cuntz, H. Denks, A. Konovaltsev, A. Hornbostel, M. Heckler, L. Greda, A. Dreher, A. Schroth, M. Meurer, German Aerospace Center, Germany
8:57. Performance of an L1/E5 GNSS Receiver using a Direct Conversion Front-End Architecture: R.M. Weiler, Surrey Space Centre, UK; P. Blunt, QinetiQ Ltd., UK; P. Jales, Surrey Space Centre, UK; M. Unwin, Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd., UK; S. Hodgart, Surrey Space Centre, UK
9:20. A New Unambiguous Tracking Technique for Sine-BOC(2n,n) Signals: Z. Yao, Tsinghua University, China
9:43. Exploiting the Secondary Codes to Improve Signal Acquisition Performance in Galileo Receivers: N.C. Shivaramaiah, A.G. Dempster, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia
10:40. A Novel Low-Complexity Acquisition Method for Next Generation GNSS Signals: P-H. Lee, D-H. Liu, National Taiwan University, Taiwan; W-L. Mao, National Formosa University, Taiwan; H-W. Tsao, F-R. Chang, National Taiwan University, Taiwan; H-C. Yeh, K-T. Chen, MediaTek Inc., Taiwan
11:03. The IRGAL Project: Innovation and Research on Galileo in Piedmont: M. Pini, M. Fantino, P. Mulassano, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy; L. Lo Presti, Politechico di Torino, Italy; L. Bragagnini, Consorzio Torino Time, Italy
11:26. Matched Filter MBOC Tracking by Accumulation: J. Diez, DEIMOS Space, Spain; J.S. Silva, DEIMOS Engenharia, Portugal; A. Fernandez, DEIMOS Space, Spain
11:48. Multipath and Tracking Performance of Galileo Ranging Signals Transmitted by GIOVE-B: A. Simsky, D. Mertens, J-M. Sleewaegen, W. De Wilde, Septentrio, Belgium; M. Hollreiser, M. Crisci, ESA/ESTEC, The Netherlands

Alternate
1. Design of Code and Carrier Tracking Loop for GPS L1C Signal: Z. Liu, B. Zhou, J. Yang, Y. Wang, National University of Defence Technology, China

This session examines the role of intellectual property (IP) in the rapidly growing area of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, receiving equipment and services.

The panel will address recent changes in the interpretation of some important aspects of patent law, as well as the trends in regulation and licensing from the perspective of their impact on current and planned systems including the following:

• What are the fundamental patents that have a strong influence on GNSS systems, receiving equipment and services?
• How will the advent of multiple GNSSs, such as GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Compass and others shape the direction of current and future IP?
• How might existing IP influence the design of emerging GNSSs?
• In what ways might the expiration of patents over the next decade affect spacecraft, receivers and services?
• What new technologies that are becoming active in the IP area may have an important effect on future systems and services?

1. Brig. Gen. David G. Ehrhart, Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Air Force:
2. Ms. Jan Conlin, Partner, Robins Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.:
3. Mr. Victor M. Wigman, Partner, Blank Rome LLP:
4. Mr. J. Scott Culpepper, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.:

1:50. An ANN Embedded POS Algorithm for a Low Cost MEMS INS/GPS Integrated System: H-W. Chang, C-Y. Li, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
2:12. Land-Based Navigation Aiding by Fusion with Airborne Sensory Data: T. Hassan, N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada
2:35. GPS/INS Integrity Monitoring Using a Modified GPB1 Filter Bank: J. Wendel, MBDA, Germany; O. Meister, R. Moenikes, University of Karlsruhe, Germany
2:58. Robust Design for GNSS Integration: J.L. Farrell, VIGIL, Inc.
4:00. Hybrid Extended Particle Filter (HEPF) for INS/GPS Integrated System: P. Aggarwal, University of Calgary, Canada
4:23. Integrating GPS and Loran for Integrity in Safety of Life Applications: B. Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning; S. Lo, L. Boyce, P. Enge, Stanford University
4:46. Performance of a Low-cost Real-time Navigation System using Single-frequency GNSS Measurements Combined with Wheel-tick Data: Ch. Hollenstein, E. Favey, Ch. Schmid, A. Somieski, D. Ammann, u-blox AG, Switzerland
5:08. Incorporating Obstructions in GDOP Mapping Through the use of LiDAR Data: K. Amolins, University of New Brunswick, Canada

Alternates
1. Object Tracking System using Microphones and Active Cameras: How to Integrate Vision and Sound for Object Tracking: G. Kim, T. Lee, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea
2. A New Method for Electronic Compass Magnetometer Calibration for Improving Azimuth Calculation in Magnetometer/GPS Integrated System: H. Guo, Nanchang University, China / University of New Brunswick, Canada; D. Kim, R. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada; M. Yu, C. Z, W. Huang, Jiangxi Normal University, China

1:50. The New L2C GPS Code: Signal and Positioning Quality Analysis: M. De Agostino, M. Piras, C. Porporato, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
2:12. Performance Evaluation of L2C Data/Pilot Combined Carrier Tracking: K. Muthuraman, University of Calgary, Canada; R. Klukas, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Canada; G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada
2:35. Evaluation of the New Civil GPS L5 Signal: H. Rho, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada
2:58. Investigation of Upload Anomalies Affecting IIR Satellites in October 2007: K. Kovach, J. Berg, V. Lin, The Aerospace Corporation
4:00. Evaluation of Compass Ambiguity Resolution Performance Using Geometric-Based Techniques with Comparison to GPS and Galileo: W. Cao, K. O´Keefe, M.E. Cannon, University of Calgary, Canada
4:23. Development of Ultimate Seamless Positioning System based on QZSS IMES: D. Manandhar, K. Okano, M. Ishii, H. Torimoto, GNSS Technologies Inc., Japan; S. Kogure, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Japan; H. Maeda, Lighthouse Technology and Consulting, Japan
4:46. C-Band User Terminal Tracking Loop Stability Analysis for European GNSS Evolution Programme: J-H. Won, B. Eissfeller, University FAF Munich, Germany; A. Schmitz-Peiffer, EADS-Astrium, Germany; E. Colzi, ESA-ESTEC, Netherlands
5:08. Multichannel Dual Frequency GLONASS Software Receiver: S. Abbasiannik, M.G. Petovello, University of Calgary, Canada

1:50. Comparison of Assisted and Stand-Alone Methods for Increasing Coherent Integration Time for Weak GPS Signal Tracking: P.L. Kazemi, C. O´Driscoll, University of Calgary, Canada
2:12. Differential Data/Pilot Joint Acquisition Strategies for Indoor Galileo E1 Signal: T.H. Ta, L. Lo Presti, F. Dovis, D. Margaria, R. Lesca, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
2:35. A New Statistical Model of the Indoor Propagation Channel for Satellite Navigation: M. Paonni, V. Kropp, A. Teuber, G.W. Hein, University FAF Munich, Germany
2:58. Combined L1 / L2C Tracking Scheme for Weak Signal Environments: C. Gernot, K. O´Keefe, G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada
4:00. Ubiquitous WiFi/GNSS Positioning System - TOA Based Distance Estimation: K. Bagdonas, K. Borre, Aalborg University, Denmark
4:23. DINGPOS: A Hybrid Indoor Navigation Platform for GPS and GALILEO: J. Salcedo, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Y. Capelle, Thales Alenia Space, France; M. Toledo, GMV, Spain; G. Seco, J. Vicario, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; D. Kubrak, M. Monnerat, Thales Alenia Space, France; A. Mark , GMV, Spain;
4:46. Effects of Oversampling and Multipath on Navigation Using OFDM Signals of Opportunity: C. Schexnayder, J. Raquet, R. Martin, J. Velotta, Air Force Institute of Technology
5:08. Augmentation of Low-cost GPS/MEMS INS with UWB Positioning System for Seamless Outdoor/Indoor Positioning : M. Tanigawa, Xsens Technologies, The Netherlands

Alternates
1. Active RFID Fingerprinting for Indoor Positioning: G. Retscher, Q. Fu, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
2. GPS Position Aiding in a Cellular Telephone without the Network Operator: M.R. Jarvis, R.W. Rowe, P.J. Duffett-Smith, Cambridge Silicon Radio,UK; A.R. Pratt, Orbstar Consultants, UK
3. GNSS Time Aiding with an Answering Machine: P.J. Duffet-Smith, Cambridge Silicon Radio, UK

1:50. RTK Relative Positioning Algorithms for Long Baselines with Estimating Ionospheric and Tropospheric Delays: S. Fujita, H. Imono, Y. Kubo, S. Sugimoto, Ritsumeikan University, Japan
2:12. SiRF Instant Fix II Technology: W. Zhang, J. Lee, V. Venkatasubramanian, H. Liu, M. Phatak, S. Han, SiRF Technology Inc.
2:35. Determination of Minimum Data Required to Achieve Desired Location Performance: S.M. Deshpande, M. Chansarkar, M. Chowdhary, SiRF Technology, Inc.
2:58. Short-term Stability of GNSS Satellite Clocks and its Effect on Precise Point Positioning (PPP): A. Hesselbarth, L. Wanninger, Dresden University of Technology, Germany
4:00. GPS Precise Absolute Positioning via Kalman Filtering: B.W. Tolman, Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin
4:23. Evalualtion of Models and Algorithms on GPS Kinematic Precise Point Positioning: C. Hu , Tongji University, China; W. Chen, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong; J. Wu , Tongji University, China
5:08. ATOM: Super Compact and Flexible Format to Store and Transmit GNSS Data : I. Artushkin, A. Boriskin, D. Kozlov, Magellan, Russia

1:50. WAAS Benefits of GEO Ranging: T. Schempp, J. Burke, A. Rubin, Raytheon Co.
2:12. Clock-and-Ephemeris Integrity Algorithms and Messages for a Dual Frequency SBAS: J. Blanch, T. Walter, P. Enge, Stanford University
2:35. Modeling Ionospheric Spatial Threat Based on Dense Observation Datasets for MSAS: T. Sakai, K. Matsunaga, K. Hoshinoo, Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Japan; T. Walter, Stanford University
2:58. A New Modeling Scheme of Satellite Ephemeris and Clock Errors for Korean WADGPS Test Bed: D. Kim, H. Yun, K. Sohn, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea
4:00. Reconstructing the WAAS Undersampled Ionosphere Gradient Threat Model for the WAAS Expansion into Mexico: E. Paredes, N. Pandya, Raytheon; L. Sparks, A. Komjathy, Caltech/Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4:23. Architecture of an FAA Certified TSO-C145b Precision Approach Receiver: R.A. Nayak ,J.K. Ray, Accord Software & Systems Pvt Ltd., India
4:46. Enhanced SBAS Integration Method using Combination of Multiple SBAS Corrections: H Yun, D. Kim, S. Jeon, B. Park, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea
5:08. Performance Assessment of a Local Area Monitoring System in Asia Pacific Region: C-H. Chen, S-S. Jan, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

Alternates
1. WADGPS Precise Point Positioning with GPS Dual-Frequency Carrier-Phase Measurements: H. Rho, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada
2. Off-line, On-line and On-target FD/FDE Test Results for Approach Phases in an Aviation Receiver: J.K. Ray, R.A. Nayak, Accord Software & Systems Pvt Ltd., India

The technology of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) is currently being used in a wide range of sectors including but not limited to: mapping, surveying and science; remote sensing; agricultural sector, ranging from basic rural cadastre and surveying to advanced precision agriculture; natural resources management; disaster warning and emergency response; aviation; maritime and land transportation; personal navigation; and law enforcement as well as space weather effects with respect to radiowave communications and navigation.

This panel discussion of short presentations will address all aspects of the use and global influences of GNSS, including panel members professional work related to the session themes, as well as national, international and regional strategies, programs and projects on the use of GNSS in their countries. The session will also examine functional partnerships and cooperation opportunities, as well as the possible need for new frameworks for cooperation that could be established through voluntary actions that could include governments, international organizations, non-governmental organizations and other relevant stakeholders in the use of GNSS technologies.

In a view of the aforementioned GNSS applications, the panel will be briefed on the International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (ICG) and Providers Forum and provide an introduction and overview to the context of the use of GNSS in support of capacity building and sustainable development, particularly in developing countries.

Please reference this page in late summer for a listing of panel members.

1. Brazil - GNSS use and Influence in Brief: Mr. Washington Campos Machado, Director, Foundation SDTP, Brazil
2. GNSS use in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Pakistan: Ashar Hashmat Lodi, Director, Exponent Engineers, Pakistan
3. GNSS: Impacts, Prospects and Challenges in Africa: Mr. Akeem Babatunde Rabiu, Senior Lecturer, Solar Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nigeria

In the past decade GPS receiver manufacturers established a worldwide business. With the advent of Galileo a new European Galileo receiver industry is emerging.

Due to interoperability between Galileo and GPS, it is easy to modify a GPS receiver for additional Galileo tracking. Do the European Galileo receiver manufacturers get a chance to conquer a share in the worldwide GNSS market or is it already too late?

Panelists will present initial remarks followed by a discussion regarding the future Galileo market share. Questions from the audience are welcome.

1. Mr. Gian Gherardo Calini, Head of Market Development, European GNSS Supervisory Authority GSA, Belgium:
2. Mr. Guenter Heinrichs, Director of Market and Services, IFEN GmbH, Germany:
3. Mr. Tony Haddrell, Staff GPS Architect, NXP Semiconductors (GPS) UK Ltd., UK:
4. Mr. Peter Grognard, CEO, Septentrio Satellite Navigation NV, Belgium:
5. Mr. Philip Mattos, Chief Engineer, GNSS, ST Micorelectronics R&D, Ltd., UK:
6. Mr. Martin Grzebellus, CEO, NavCert GmbH, Germany:

8:35. Analysis of Low-cost GPS/INS Integration for Bistatic SAR Experiments: S. Knedlik, J. Zhou, Z. Dai, E. Edwan, O. Loffeld, University of Siegen, Germany
8:57. A Comparison of the Performance of a Non-Coherent Deeply Integrated Navigation Algorithm and a Tightly Coupled Navigation Algorithm: M. Lashley, Navigation Technology Associates, Inc.; D. Bevly, Auburn University
9:20. Improving the Performance of Portable Navigation Devices by Using Partial IMU Based GPS/INS Integration Technology: C. Ma, X. Niu, S. Han, SiRF Technology Inc.
9:43. Particle Filtering Algorithm for Ultra-tight GNSS/INS Integration: D. Bernal, P. Closas, J.A. Fernandez-Rubio, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain
10:40. Observability Analysis of Attitude Error States in GPS/SINS In-flight Alignment: Y. Geng, A. Dempster, C. Rizos, J. Wang, The University of New South Wales, Australia
11:03. Improvement of GNSS Signal Acquisition Using Low-Cost Inertial Sensors: D. Kubrak, M. Monnerat, Thales Alenia Space, France; G. Artaud, L. Ries, CNES, France
11:26. Integrating External Position Information with GPS using Existing GPS Processing Software for Precision Agriculture Applications: A. Cole, University of New South Wales, Australia
11:48. Modified Gaussian Sum Nonlinear Filters for INS/GPS Integrated Systems: M. Nakagawa, H. Okuno, T. Sato, Y. Kubo, S. Sugimoto, Ritsumeikan University, Japan

Alternate
1. Utilization of GPS Derived Acceleration to Aid MEMS Inertial Sensors for Estimation of Dynamic Attitude: Y. Li, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia

8:35. Design of a Regional Satellite Navigation System Constellation Using Genetic Algorithms: H. Ozdemir, TUAF; J. Raquet, G. Lamont, N. Titus, Air Force Institute of Technology
8:57. Assessment on the Use of C-Band for GNSS within the European GNSS Evolution Programme: A. Schmitz-Peiffer, D. Felbach, F. Soualle, R. King, S. Paus, EADS-Astrium, Germany; A. Fernandez, Deimos S.L., Spain; R. Jorgensen, TICRA, Denmark; B. Eissfeller, J.A. Avila-Rodriguez, S. Wallner, J-H. Won, T. Pany, M. Anghileri, B. Lankl, University FAF
9:20. Analysis of GPS Monitor Station Outages with Architecture Evolution Plan: B. Stanton, R. Strother, W.P. Petrofski, SI International, Inc.
9:43. GPS Pseudorange Measurement Calibration: M. Menn, X. Tran, The Aerospace Corporation
10:40. Orbit Determination of COMPASS-M1 Under Time Synchronism Between Stations: H. Lei, X-H. Yang, Z-G. Li, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; W-H. Jiao, Q-W. Yang, Satellite Navigation Project Center, China
11:03. The Impact of Compass/Beidou-2 on Future GNSS: A Perspective From Asia: Y-S. Huang, M-L. Tsai, National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan
11:26. The Constellation Design of Taiwan´s Regional Navigation Satellite System: H-C. Chen, Y-S. Huang, M-L. Tsai, K-W. Chiang, National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan
11:48. GPS III Integrity Concept: K. Kovach, The Aerospace Corporation; J. Dobyne, ARINC Engineering Services; M. Crews, U.S. Air Force; C. Miles, Federal Aviation Administration

Alternate
1. Evaluation of Positioning Accuracy with Differential GPS/GLONASS: H. Yamada, T. Takasu, T. Ebinuma, N. Kubo, A. Yasuda, Laboratory of Communication Engineering, Japan

8:35. Implementation and Analysis of an SDR Processor for GNSS Software Correlators: G. Kappen, V. Pieper, L. Kurz, T.G. Noll, RWTH University, Germany
8:57. A Real-Time Software Receiver for the GLONASS L1 Signals: S. Peng, B.M. Ledvina, Virginia Tech
9:20. System Aspects and Practical Results for Precise Car Navigation with L2CS using a Software Receiver: D. Sanroma Guixens, D. Dotterbock, T. Pany, B. Eissfeller, University FAF Munich, Germany
9:43. Performance Analysis of a Dual-Frequency Reconfigurable L1/L5 GNSS Receiver Subject to DME/TACAN Interference: S. Ramakrishnan, G.X. Gao, D. De Lorenzo, T. Walter, Stanford University; D. Akos, Stanford University/University of Colorado at Boulder; P. Enge, Stanford University
10:40. Optimum Digital Filters for GNSS Tracking Loops: P.L. Kazemi, University of Calgary, Canada
11:03. Assessing the Spoofing Threat: Development of a Portable GPS Civilian Spoofer: T.E. Humphreys, B.M. Ledvina, M.L. Psiaki, P.M. Kintner, Jr., Virginia Tech
11:26. FPGA-Optimized GNSS Receiver Implementation Techniques: H.S. Cobb, Novariant, Inc.
11:48. Real-time Multipath Monitoring and Characterization with a variable Spacing Correlator on a FPGA-Based Software GNSS Receiver: J.-C. Guay, B. Sauriol, M.-A. Fortin, Ecole De Technologie Superieure, Canada

Alternates
2. Snapshot Positioning for Unaided GPS Software Receivers: Y. Qian, X. Cui, M. Lu, Z. Feng, Tsinghua University, China
3. Comparison of GPS Tracking Loop Performance in Weak Signal Condition with Nonlinear Filtering Techniques: S-H. Im, J-H. Song, K-H. Kim, G-I. Jee, Konkuk University, South Korea; C.G. Park, Seoul National University, South Korea
4. Triple Frequency RF Front End for GNSS Instrumentation Receiver Applications: S. Gunawardena, Z. Zhen, F. van Graas, Ohio University

8:35. Assessment of the Second Order Ionosphere Error on Position Solutions: J. Morton, F. van Graas, Q. Zhou, Miami University
8:57. Ionospheric Time Delay Statistics of GPS Signals at Low Latitude Stations: A.D. Sarma, V. Satya srinivas, K. Ravi Chandra, Osmania University, India
9:20. Impact of New Satellite Navigation Systems on Ionospheric Specification: C.N. Mitchell, P.S.J. Spencer, University of Bath, UK
9:43. Retrieving Vertical Ionosphere Electron Density Profile with an Improved Abel Inversion Algorithm: G. Ouyang, J. Wang, University of New South Wales, Australia
10:40. Evaluation of Deep Signal Fading Effects Due to Ionospheric Scintillation on GPS Aviation Receivers: J. Seo, T. Walter, T-Y. Chiou, P. Enge, Stanford University
11:03. Inter-frequency Bias Estimation for the GPS Monitor Station Network: D. Holaschutz, University of Texas at Austin / Booz Allen Hamilton; R.H. Bishop, R.B. Harris, B.W. Tolman, Applied Research Lab. / The University of Texas at Austin
11:26. A New Technique to Improve the Electron Density Retrieval Accuracy: Application to FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC Constellation: M.A. Aragon-Angel, Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Spain
11:48. Investigation of Scintillation Characteristics for High Latitude Phenomena: S. Skone, R. Tiwari, F. Ghafoori, University of Calgary, Canada

Alternates
1. Regional TEC Model using Improved Neural Network and its Application in Single Frequency Precise Point Positioning: C. Xu, Department of Geography, Minjiang University, China; Z. Li, X. Hua, Q. Fan, School of Geodsy & Geomatics, Wuhan University, China
2. Mitigation of the Ionospheric Range Error in Single-frequency GNSS Applications: C. Mayer, N. Jakowski, J. Beckheinrich, E. Engler, German Aerospace Center, Germany
3. Local Models in Ionosphere VTEC Estimation Based on GNSS Regression Models: S. Fujita, H. Yamamoto, Y. Kubo, S. Sugimoto, Ritsumeikan University, Japan
4. Improved Klobuchar Model for GNSS Ionospheric Delay Correction and its Performance in Chinese Area: H. Zhang, Wuhan University,China; W. Zhu, J. Ping, Chinese Academy of Science, China; C. Shi, J. Liu, Wuhan University,China

8:35. NASA RNSS Spectrum Protection Activities: J.J. Miller, J.E. Hollansworth, NASA Headquarters; B.L. Brodsky, A.J. Oria, Overlook Systems Technologies
8:57. The L5 Demo Payload on GPS Mission IIR-20: T. Powell, C. Edgar, H. Ozisik, The Aerospace Corporation; M. McFadden, D. Reigh, R. Spieth, Lockheed Martin; J. Irvine, ITT
9:20. GNSS Receiver Testing Focussing on Strong Interference by use of a Hardware Signal Simulator: H. Denks, A. Hornbostel, German Aerospace Center; Germany; J-M. Perre, Thales Avionics

8:35. Precise Positioning of Ships and Buoys in the Open Ocean - Results from a 3-Month Indian Ocean Cruise, and a tsunami Buoy off Japan´s Coast: C. Rocken, T. Iwabuchi, GPS Solutions Inc., USA; M. Fujita, JAMSTEC, Japan; M. Kanzaki, Nippon GPS Solutions, Japan
8:57. A Study on the Dissemination of Network-Based Differential GPS Corrections for e-Navigation: K.Y. Seo, S.H. Park, J.K. Choi, S.H. Suh, Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute, South Korea
9:20. A Feasibility Study on L1/L2C Software RSIM for Maritime DGPS: S.H. Park, D.J. Cho, J.K. Choi, S.H. Suh, Korea Ocean R&D Institute, South Korea
9:43. Integrating Monolithic Ring Laser Gyros with Legacy Shipboard Navigation and Weapons Systems to Improve Inertial Navigation System Performance: R. Webb, W.R. Woodward, Ursa Navigation Solutions, Inc.; D.J. Weber, R.F. Weingaertner, Kearfott Guidance & Navigation Corporation

8:35. Galileo System Performance for Different Users and Constellations: V. Oehler, J.M. Krueger, H.Trautenberg, J.Daubrawa, EADS Astrium GmbH, Germany
8:57. Galileo Ground Mission Segment Architecture and Performances: B. Kleine Schlarmann, M. Hollreiser, ESTEC/ESA, The Netherlands
9:20. Galileo Mission Segment Dissemination Mechanisms Message Generation Facility Architecture: R. Pagnot, EADS Astrium, France; J. Poumailloux, Thales Alenia Space, France; G. Bulsa, ESA, The Netherlands
9:43. The Galileo Key Management Facilities: N. Shave, M. Potter, A. Coen, Logica, UK
10:40. The ESA "GNSS+" Project. Inter-satellite Ranging and Inter-satellite Communication Links in the Frame of the GNSS Infrastructure Evolutions: F. Amarillo, J-L. Gerner, European Space Agency, The Netherlands; M. Sanchez, DEIMOS, Spain
11:03. Improved Integrity Concept for Future GNSS Evolutions: C. Catalan, C. Hernandez, A. Mozo, L. Fernandez, J. Caro, GMV Aerospace and Defense, S.A., Spain; F. Amarillo, European Space Agency
11:26. A Regional Integrity Implementation of a European Global Navigation Satellite System: J. Daubrawa, H.L. Trautenberg, EADS Astrium, Germany
11:48. Assessment of Galileo Real Data with Bay-Nav-Tech Performance Assessment Facility: M. Kirchner, J. Vilzmann, EADA Astrium, Germany

Alternates
1. Study on a Potential Galileo Signal and Service Plan for C-band: J-A. Avila-Rodriguez, S. Wallner, B. Eissfeller, University FAF Munich, Germany; F. Soualle, A. Schmitz-Peiffer, D. Feldbach, EADS Astrium GmbH, Germany; E. Colzi, J.L. Gerner, ESA
2. Realising the Galileo Service Centre at IOV - A Design and Implementation Overview: A. Coen, M. Roberts, Logica UK Ltd, UK
3. Improving the Signal-In-Space Monitoring Accuracy of an External Regional Integrity System for Galileo using Co-located Receiver Baselines: A. Deem, Y. Feng, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
4. Certification of Services: Multimodal Certification, Transfer of Liability and Reduction of Risks: M. Grzebellus, NavCert GmbH, Germany

1:50. Pseudolite Navigation for Rotorcraft and Ground-Based Vehicles: D. Brekke, The Boeing Company; Andrew Brown, D. Wilson, Center for Remote Sensing, Inc.
2:12. Locata-based Positioning in the Presence of WiFi Interference: Test Results: F.A. Khan, A.G. Dempster, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia
2:35. Urban Positioning using Signals of Opportunity : G. Gerten, A. Gorski, Analytical Graphics Inc.
2:58. Active RFID for Positioning using Trilateration and Location Fingerprinting Based on RSSI: Q. Fu, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
3:20. Seamless Outdoor-to-Indoor Pedestrian Navigation using GPS and UWB: D. Chiu, Glenn MacGougan, K. O´Keefe, University of Calgary, Canada
3:42. Aerial Navigation in GPS-denied Environments using a Closed-feedback Error Loop Between the Navigation and LiDAR Sensors: D.A. Grejner-Brzezinska, C.K. Toth, Y-J. Lee, The Ohio State University
4:04. Passive Positioning System Based on Double GEO Satellites and Error Correction Models: R. Li, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Zhu, BeiHang University, China
4:26. Development and Flight Test of a Robust Optical-Inertial Navigation System Using Low-Cost Sensors: M. Nielsen, J. Raquet, M. Veth, M. Pachter, Air Force Institute of Technology

Alternates
1. The Loran Coverage Analysis Simulation Tool: S. Lo, Stanford University; B. Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning; L. Boyce, P. Enge, Stanford University
2. Flying with STARS: J.A. Shockley, R.S. Lawrence, 746th Test Squadron

1:50. Determination of the Spectral Separation Between Signals and its Effect on GNSS Receiver Performance. A More Pragmatic Approach: D. Fernandez-Prim, M. Schoenhuber, O. Koudelka, Joanneum Research Institute of Applied Technology, Austria
2:12. Design and Implementation of a Multi-Signal-Structure GNSS Signal Simulator Using Low IF Digital Quadrature Modulation: Y. Kou, B. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Beihang University, China
2:35. Integrating High Resolution Terrain Data into Global PDOP Calculations: M.A. Staley, Headquarters Air Force Space Command; M.A. Brilleslyper, U.S. Air Force Academy
2:58. Dilution of Precision Factor in Medium Earth Orbit Search and Rescue Systems: R. Paiement, M. Caron, X. Tang, Communications Research Centre Canada
3:20. Real-Time Data Disseminator (RTD2) for Simulation Systems and Integration Testing: B. Gerten, Prenap; G. Gerten, Analytical Graphics Inc.
3:42. GNSS Signal Analysis and Monitoring Tools Developed within the SWAN Project: E. Falletti, B. Motella, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy; D. Margaria, CNIT-Politecnico di Torino, Italy; L. Giugno, Wiser, Italy; M. Luise, CNIT-Universita degli Studi di Pisa, Italy; R. Marracci, Intecs, Italy; F. Longo, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana
4:04. GNSS Introduction in the Rail Sector: Real-time Environment and Train Sensors System Simulator: P. D´Angelo, S. Gomez de Aguero, D. De Castro, A. Fernandez, DEIMOS Space S.L, Spain; A. Albanese, L. Foglia, Thales Alenia Space
4:26. SEXTANT: A High-Fidelity Navigation Simulation Testbed: K.M. Betts, B.K. DeKock, SAIC, Space Development Division; D.L. Reed, J. Gewehr, D.E. Bezanson, SAIC Space Systems Division

1:50. A Dual Stacked Dish Antenna for GPS Satellite Applications that Produces Equal Strength L-Band Signals Everywhere on Earth: Y.U. Kim, F.M. Czopek, The Boeing Company
2:12. A New Approach to Cellphone GPS Antennas: T. Haddrell, M. Phocas, N. Ricquier, NXP Semiconductors Belgium
2:35. An Analysis of Multipath Mitigation Techniques Suitable for Geodetic Antennas: R. Granger, S. Simpson, Roke Manor Research Ltd., UK
2:58. Simulation of Antennas Mounted on Rotorcrafts: I.J. Gupta, K. Griffith, The Ohio State University
3:20. Adaptive Array Phase Control using an Integrated Software GPS Signal Processing Architecture: S.K. Kalyanaraman, Rockwell Collins; M.S. Braasch, Ohio University
3:42. Mitigation of Continuous and Pulsed Radio Interference with GNSS Antenna Arrays: A. Konovaltsev, German Aerospase Center, Germany ; D.S. De Lorenzo, Stanford University; A. Hornbostel, German Aerospase Center, Germany; P. Enge, Stanford University
4:04. Optimum Adaptive Filtering for GNSS Antenna Arrays: A.J. O´Brien, I.J. Gupta, The Ohio State University
4:26. An Adaptive Antenna Combining with PI Algorithm and Spectral Excision Technique: R. Di, Research Institute of Technology, China

Alternates
1. Innovative Multifunction Radio and Soft Based GPS: P-L. Normark, C. Stahlberg, D. Akos, Cambridge Silicon Radio, Sweden
2. Post-Processing Dynamic GNSS Antenna Array Calibration and Deterministic Beamforming: S. Backen, D.M. Akos, M.L. Nordenvaad, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden
3. Interference Mitigation Technique using DOA Information of Interferences for the GPS Receiver: G.W. Lee, D.W. Lim, Chungnam National University, South Korea; C. Park, Chungbuk National University, South Korea; D-H. Hwang, S.J. Lee, Chungnam National University, South Korea

1:50. Generation of Third Code and Phase Signals Based on Dual-Frequency GPS Measurements: B. Li, Tongji University, China/Queensland University of Technology, Australia
2:12. An Overview of Three Carrier Ambiguity Resolutions: Problems, Models, Methods and Performance Analysis Using Semi-Generated Triple Frequency GPS Data: Y. Feng, B. Li, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
2:35. Performance Evaluation of Combined GPS/Galileo Multi-frequency RTK Positioning Using Partial Ambiguity Fixing: W. Cao, K. O´Keefe, M.E. Cannon, University of Calgary, Canada
2:58. Towards Single Epoch Ambiguity Resolution with Galileo Multiple Frequency using Improved Cascading Ambiguity Resolution (CAR) Method: W. Chen, S. Ji, X. Ding, Y. Chen, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong; C. Hu, Tongji University, Hong Kong
3:20. GPS+GLONASS RTK: Making the Choice Between Civilian and Military L2 GLONASS Signals: F. Boon, W. De Wilde, J-M. Sleewaegen, Septentrio Satellite Navigation, Belgium
3:42. Improving Performances of Classic Three Carrier Ambiguity Resolution (TCAR) Algorithms for Galileo using GTCAR: J. Simon, B. Martin Peiro, M. Toledo, GMV, Spain
4:04. Estimation of GPS/GLONASS System Time Difference with Application to PPP: C-S. Cai, Y. Gao, University of Calgary, Canada

1:50. Validation of the Offset Precision Approach with Vertical Guidance to Landing using LAAS as Sole Means of Navigation: J. Fagan, P.Y-R. Huang, Y-Z. Xue, University of Oklahoma; G. McCartor, Federal Aviation Administration
2:12. Solutions to Issues of GBAS using SBAS Ranging Signals: N. Fujii, S. Saito, Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Japan; K. suzuki, T. Ono, NEC Corporation, Japan
2:35. High Performance Navigation Algorithms for Aviation - Results of Approach and Airport Surface Movement Tests: W. Schuster, J. Bai, W. Ochieng, M. Steen, Imperial College London, UK; P.M. Schachtebek, Institut fuer Flugfuehrung, Technische Universitaet Braunschweig, Germany
2:58. Trimble´s Marine Reference Station Modernization: K.E. Ferguson, M.K. Albright, M. Brand, Trimble Navigation, Ltd., Germany
3:20. Continuity and Integrity Aspects of an Integrated GBAS/INS Navigation System: M. Steen, U. Bestmann, T. Feuerle, M. Stanisak, P. Hecker, Institute of Flight Guidance, TU-BS, Germany
3:42. Cascade Dual Frequency Smoothing Performance Evaluation Study: R. Xue, J. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Beihang University, China
4:04. Ionospheric Spatial Gradient Monitoring by using a Long Baseline Monitor with Integrity Algorithms: J. Kim, M-S. Jeong, J. Ahn, Y.J. Lee, Korea Aerospace University, South Korea
4:26. Performance Assessment of GBAS CAT III using GPS and GALILEO: B. Belabbas, P. Remi, M. Meurer, German Aerospace Center, Germany

Alternates
1. Estimation of Tropospheric Time Delay for Indian LAAS: A.D. Sarma, Osmania University, India; Q. Sultana, College of Engineering and Technology, India; V.S. Srinivas, K.R. Chandra, Osmania University, India
2. PORIMA - Precise Predicted Orbit based Receiver Integrity Monitoring Algorithm: H. Su, W. Ehret, O. Thales, Germany
3. Receiver Carrier-to-Noise Ratio Monitoring Based on Improved Cumulative Sum(CUSUM) Method: L. Xia, Z. Xuejun, X. Rui, School of Electronic Information & Engineering, Beihang University, China

1:50. An Optimal Design for Server-Based RTK Systems: S. Lim, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia
2:12. Modeling 3D Deformation using Terrestrial LiDAR: S. Selvarajan, A. Mohamed, G. Barnes, University of Florida
2:35. Earth Quake Induced Deformation on Malaysian Geodetic Infrastructures: K.M. Omar, K.T. Chew, University Technology Malaysia, Malaysia
2:58. Deformation Monitoring with Single Frequency L1 Receivers: T. Iwabuchi, J. Johnson, S. Cummins, C. Rocken, GPS Solutions Inc., USA; Y. Iotake, M. Kanzaki, Nippon GPS Solutions, Japan
3:20. Software Based GNSS L1 Interferometric Positioning: B.J. Muth, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
3:42. Multiple UWB Range Assisted GPS RTK in Hostile Environments: D.Chiu, K. O´Keefe, University of Calgary, Canada
4:26. Integrating Absolute Gravimetry into the Canadian Spatial Reference System: Current Efforts and Priorities: J. Henton, J. Silliker, J. Liard, M. Berube, M. Craymer, R. Duval, C. Gagnon,
Natural Resources Canada, Canada