1. Integrated GPS, LORAN-C and INS for Land Navigation Applications: C. Hide, C. Hill, T. Moore, C. Noakes, D. Park, University of Nottingham, U.K.
2. A Zenith Delay Model for Precise Kinematic Aircraft Navigation: O.L. Colombo, GEST/NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
3. Mitigating Atmospheric Noise for Loran: C.O. Lee Boyce, S.C. Lo, J.D. Powell, P.K. Enge, Stanford University
4. Long-Range High-Accuracy UWB Ranging for Precise Positioning: H. Yu, University of Leeds, U.K.
5. A Flying Demonstrator for Future Missile and UAV Navigation Systems: B. Gabrielsson, F. Neregard, N.K. Johansson, N.P. Johansson, K. Lundberg, P. Jonsson, Saab Bofors Dynamics, Sweden
6. Field Test Results of a Flexible Pseudolite Based Navigation System: J. Noronha, A. Jovancevic, N. Bhatia, B. Sirpatil, M. Kirchner, D. Saxena, Center for Remote Sensing, Inc.
7. A Feasibility Study on the Regional Navigation Transceiver System Using a Transceiver Position Estimation Algorithm: B. Park, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea; B-S. Paik, K-H. Lee, Agency for Defense Development, South Korea
8. Use of a Software Radio to Evaluate Signals of Opportunity for Navigation: J.A. McEllroy, J.F. Raquet, M.A. Temple, Air Force Institute of Technology

Alternates
1. A High Integrity Positioning Method for Ad-Hoc Networks: R. Mautz, S. Feng, W. Ochieng, Imperial College London, U.K.; A. Kemp, B. Peng, The University of Leeds, U.K.
2. Galileo and 4G: The Competing and Cooperating Technologies for Communication Applications: A. Bhutto, University of Nottingham, U.K.
3. A Passive Regional Hybrid Positioning System: TGSNS/Barometer : R. Li, Y. Wang, BeiHang University, China

1. Vertical-sensing Effectiveness & CONOPS Tool for Operational Requirements: (VECTOR): J. Catanzarite, G. Green, General Dynamics; D. Jacobs, AFRL\SNRW
2. Theory & Test Results of Antenna Advanced Inertial Reference for Enhanced Sensors (ANTARES) Lever Arm Flexure Estimation $ Compensation for Ultra-Tightly Coupled GPS-INS & RF Emitter Geo-Location Sys. Using Aux. Antenna-Mounted Inertial Measurement Units: P. Quinn, D. Lewis, Raytheon Company; M. Berarducci, M. Miller, J. Campbell, P. Howe, Wright Patterson AFB
3. Survivability Testing of a Gun Hard MEMS IMU/GPS Navigation System: K. Sheard, J. Tidd, I. Scaysbrook, BAE Systems, U.K.; T. Keynan, BAE Systems, Rokar International Ltd.; K.C. Fong, Singapore Technologies Kinetics, Singapore
4. Software Defined Navigation Signal Generator: M.F. Ryba, BAE Systems, Electronics & Integrated Solutions
5. Handheld, Low Cost Situational Awareness Using Existing Military Fielded Equipment: J.T. Kelly, M.D. Chapman, B. Barton, Rockwell Collins Inc.
6. Flexible GPS Receiver for Jammer Detection, Characterization and Mitigation Using a 3D CRPA : D. Wilson, S. Ganguly, Center for Remote Sensing, Inc.
7. Theoretical Approach to Determining the 95% Probability of TTFF for the P(Y) Code Utilizing Active Code Acquisition: J.K. Holmes, N.A. Morgan, P. Dafesh, The Aerospace Corporation
8. AFOTEC Evaluation of GPS Jamming Models: C.R. Flowers, A.C. Ellingson, AFOTEC/TSE

1. Low Cost Sub-meter Accuracy Anytime, Anywhere: C. Ray, Fusion Numerics Inc.
2. Leica System 1200 – High Performance GNSS Technology for RTK Applications: F. Takac, J. Walford, Leica Geosystems, Switzerland
3. Highly-Integrated Solution for Ultra-fast Acquisition and Precise Tracking of Weak GPS and Galileo L1 Signals: C. Burgi, E. De Mey, A. Orzati, A. Thiel, u-blox AG, Switzerland
4. A Novel Development Environment for GNSS Receivers to Close the Model-to-Product Gap: O. Otaegui, N. Lucas, G. Rohmer, Fraunhofer Institut IIS, Germany
5. The Merlin Signal Generator - A Powerful, Low-Cost Constellation Galileo/GPS Signal Simulator: J. Winkel, R. Wolf, IfEN GmbH, Germany; G. Prokoph, G. Mocker, Work GmbH, Germany
6. Highly Integrated GPS/EGNOS Receiver Chipset: M. Overbeck, Fraunhofer IIS, Germany; G. Wistuba, IMST GmbH; O. Otaegui, Fraunhofer IIS, Germany; S. Haas, IMST GmbH; B. Niemann, Fraunhofer IIS, Germany; F. Henkel, IMST GmbH; G. Rohmer, Fraunhofer IIS, Germany
7. The iSuite MP, a True MultiPlatform Development Environment: K-K. Hogstrom, H. Kuusniemi, S. Soderholm, M. Raty, T. Ylhainen, S. Kakarlapudi, Fastrax Ltd., Finland
8. Evaluation of the GRACE Inter-Satellite Ranging Instrument With GPS Measurements: J. Kim, Hankuk Aviation University, South Korea; U-D. Ko, University of Texas at Austin; W. Bertiger, Jet Propulsion Laboratory; F. Flechtner, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany

1. A New Signal-to-Noise-Ratio Based Stochastic Model for GNSS High-Precision Carrier Phase Data Processing Algorithms in the Presence of Multipath Errors: L. Lau, P. Cross, University College London, U.K.
2. Fast Ambiguity Resolution by a Combined System of Multiple-Baseline Equations: T. Kashiwayanagi, Y. Koura, K. Ogawa, H. Suzuki, M. Nakamura, Japan Radio Co., Ltd., Japan
3. GPS Un-Differenced Ambiguity Resolution and Validation: M. Wang, Y. Gao, The University of Calgary, Canada
4. Standalone Real-time Navigation Algorithm for Single-frequency Ionosphere-free Positioning Based on Dynamic Ambiguities (DARTS-SF): A. Simsky, Septentrio, Belgium
5. A New Three-Frequency, Geometry-Free, Technique for Ambiguity Resolution: R.R. Hatch, NavCom Technology, Inc.
6. Investigation of Ambiguity Resolution Performance of Short-, Medium- and Long-distance Baselines Based on Four Galileo Frequencies: S. Ji, W. Chen, C. Zhao, X. Ding, Y. Chen, Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
7. A Three-Step Method to Separate Real-Time Systematic Errors Suitable for GPS Medium-Long Baselines: X. Luo, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
8. Integer Ambiguity Estimation and Validation in Attitude Determination Environments: Y. Moon, S. Verhagen, Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems, The Netherlands

Alternate
1. Unified Methods of Point and Relative Positioning Based on GNSS Regression Equations: S. Sugimoto, Y. Kubo, Ritsumeikan University, Japan

1. Carrier Phase Airborne and Ground Monitors for Ionospheric Front Detection for Category III LAAS: L. Gratton, B. Pervan, Illinois Institute of Technology
2. Signal Deformation Monitoring Scheme Implemented in a Prototype Local Area Augmentation System Ground Installation: F. Liu, M. Brenner, C.Y. Tang, Honeywell International
3. Remote Controlled, Continuously Operating GPS Anomalous Event Monitor: S. Gunawardena, M. Uijt de Haag, F. van Graas, Z. Zhu, Ohio University
4. Position-Domain Geometry Screening to Maximize LAAS Availability in the Presence of Ionosphere Anomalies: J. Lee, M. Luo, S. Pullen, Y.S. Park, P. Enge, Stanford University; M. Brenner, Honeywell Aerospace
5. Ionosphere Monitoring Methodology for Hybrid Dual-Frequency LAAS: H. Konno, S. Pullen, J. Rife, P. Enge, Stanford University
6. A Statistical Analysis of Balked Landing Approaches for the Airbus A-380 Under GBAS Guidance: J. Higuera, H.J. Kumin, J.E.Fagan, University of Oklahoma; G. McCartor, Federal Aviation Administration
7. Gate-to-Gate with Modernized GPS, GALILEO and GBAS - Harmonization of Precision Approach Performance Requirements: W. Schuster , W. Ochieng; Imperial College London, U.K.
8. Mitigation of Ionospheric Gradient Threats for GBAS to Support CAT II/III: T. Murphy, M. Harris, Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Alternates
1. Symmetric Overbounding of Correlated Errors: J.H. Rife, Stanford University; D. Gebre-Egziabher, University of Minnesota
2. Treatment of Faulted Navigation Sensor Error when Assessing Risk of Unsafe Landing for CAT IIIB LAAS: C.A. Shively, CAASD The MITRE Corporation

1. Galileo System Design & Performance: V. Oehler, H.L. Trautenberg, J.M. Krueger, T. Rang, EADS Astrium, Germany; F. Luongo, Alcatel Alenia Space, Italy; J.P. Boyereo, GMV, Spain; J. Hahn, D. Blonski, European Space Agency
2. Producing the Galileo Services From the Ground Mission Segment (GMS): S. Journo, J. Poumailloux, J-M. Pieplu, P. Gouni, Alcatel-Alenia Space, France
3. Galileo Mission Segment Processing Chain: Algorithm Design, Performance and Verification: C. Bourga, S. Lannelongue, F. Bauer, H. Delfour, M. van den Bossche, B. Lobert, Alcatel Alenia Space, France
4. Galileo Integrity Processing Facility: Preliminary Design: E. Sardon, E. Mora, C. Hernandez, J.R. Martin, GMV S.A., Spain
5. Timing Performance of Galileo Mission Segment (GMS): A. Moudrak, J. Furthner, J. Hammesfahr, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany; C. Bourga, Alcatel Alenia Space, France
6. The Galileo System Test Bed V2 for Orbit and Clock Modeling: R. Piriz, V. Fernandez, A. Auz, GMV S.A., Spain; P. Tavella, I. Sesia, G. Cerretto, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM); M. Falcone, D. Navarro, J. Hahn, F. González, M. Tossaint, European Space Agency; M. Gandara, Alcatel Alenia Space
7. CDF Overbounding in the Galileo Experimental Off-Line Analysis Tool (E-OATp): M. Sanchez-Gestido, J.F. Martin-Albo, J. Arranz-Richart, Deimos Space, S.L., Spain
8. Galileo Orbitography and Synchronisation Processing Facility: Preliminary Design: J.R. Martin, I. Castrillo, A.B. Martin, S. Cilla, E. Mora, GMV S.A., Spain

Alternate
2. Satisfying the Continuity Requirements for Level A, B and C Users of Galileo, the Satellite Navigation System of Europe, With a Data Stream That was Originally Designed Only for Level A Users: H.L. Trautenberg, EADS Astrium, Germany

1. Real-Time Web-based Image Distribution Using an Airborne GPS/Inertial Image Server: A. Brown, H. Holland, Y. Lu, NAVSYS Corporation
2. Combined GPS/Acoustic Seafloor Geodetic Observation System for Monitoring Off-shore Active Seismic Regions near Japan: M. Fujita, Y. Matsumoto, T. Ishikawa, Hydrographic & Oceanographic Dept., Japan; M. Mochizuki, University of Tokyo, Japan; M. Sato, K. Kawai, T. Yabuki, Hydrographic & Oceanographic Dept., Japan; A. Asada, University of Tokyo, Japan; O.L. Colombo, NASA G
3. Photogrammetric Bridging of GPS/INS in Urban Centers for Mobile Mapping Applications: T. Hassan, C. Ellum, S. Nassar, W. Cheng, N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada
4. Mapping Brazil with Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS: G. Gelli, L.P.S. Fortes, M.J.C. Augusto, L.B. Gomes, A.L. Coelho, L.F. Oliveira, Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, Brazil; N. La Belle-Hamer, J. Nicoll, S. Arko, D. Atwood, University of Alaska
5. Implementation of Open-loop Tracking for Airborne GPS Occultation Measurements: B. Ventre, J.L. Garrison, Purdue University
6. GPS Open-Loop Differential Real-Time Receiver (GOLD-RTR): a Multi-functional Hardware GPS Receiver for Remote Sensing: E. Cardellach, O. Nogues, S. Oliveras, Institut d´Estudis Espacials de Catalunya, Spain; L. Olsen, Aalborg University, Denmark; S. Ribo, J. Torrobella, A. Rius, Institut d´Estudis Espacials de Catalunya, Spain
7. A Modular GPS Remote Sensing Software Receiver for Small Platforms: M. Junered, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden; S. Esterhuizen, D. Akos, University of Colorado
8. Prototype Software-based Receiver for Remote Sensing Using Reflected GPS Signals: D. Manandhar, GNSS Technologies Inc., Japan; R. Shibasaki, The University of Tokyo, Japan; H. Torimoto, GNSS Technologies Inc., Japan

Alternates
2. Validation of Ocean Roughness Retrievals From the Bistatic GPS Experiment on the UK-DMC Satellite Using a High Resolution Airborne Laser Scanner: J. Garrison, J.A. Parrin, Purdue Unviersity; S. Gleason, M. Adjrad, University of Surrey
3. Low Cost Attitude Determination System for 3D Mobile Mapping System: N. Kajiawra, J. Takiguchi, T. Kuroda, Y. Ito, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan
4. Performance Requirement of GPS/INS Analysis for Airborne-based GPS Downward-looking Occultation: T. Yoshihara, N. Fujii, S. Saitoh, T. Sakai, K. Hoshinoo, K. Matsunaga, Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Japan; T. Tsuda, Kyoto University, Japan; Y. Aoyama, National Institute of Polar Research, Japan

1. A Close Formation Flight Test for Automated Air Refueling: S. Ross, U.S. Air Force; M. Pachter, D.R. Jacques, J. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology
2. DARPA Autonomous Airborne Refueling Demonstration Program With Initial Results: J. Hansen, G. Romrell, N. Nabaa, R. Andersen, Sierra Nevada Corporation; L. Myers, NASA; J. McCormick, DARPA
3. Development and Testing of a High-Rate Air-to-Air Relative Navigation System for UAV Refueling: C.J. Spinelli, J.F. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology; B. Kish, Air Force Test Pilot School
4. Land Based JPALS Guidance Quality: E. Lagimoniere, D. Rudy, Sierra Nevada Corporation; B.R. Peterson, ARINC Engineering Services
5. GPS Anti-Jam Antenna System Measurement Error Characterization and Compensation: G.A. McGraw, C.E. McDowell, J.M. Kelly, Rockwell Collins
6. A Robust GPS/INS Kinematic Integrity Algorithm for Aircraft Landing: A. Brown, B. Matthews, NAVSYS Corporation
7. Use of Inertial Integration to Enhance Availability for Shipboard Relative GPS (SRGPS): C.R. Offer, P.D. Groves, A.A. Macaulay, D.L. Nash, C.J. Mather, QinetiQ, U.K.
8. JPALS Tactical System Performance Evaluation Using a Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna: T. Skidmore, C. Cohenour, F. van Graas, M. DiBenedetto, Ohio University; B. Peterson, ARINC Engineering Services

1. Antenna-based Multipath and Interference Mitigation for Aeronautical Applications: Present and Future: O. Esbri-Rodriguez, DLR German Aerospace Center, Germany; M. Philipakkis, ERA Technology, U.K.; A. Konovaltsev, F. Antreich, DLR German Aerospace Center, Germany; C. Martel, Onera, France; D. Moore, ERA Technology, U.K
2. Navigation Accuracy and Interference Rejection for an Adaptive GPS Antenna Array: D.S. De Lorenzo, J. Rife, P. Enge, Stanford University; D. Akos, University of Colorado at Boulder
3. Non-Planar Controlled Reception Pattern Antennas for GPS Receivers: I.J. Gupta, The Ohio State University; J.A. Ulrey, Northrop Grumman Corp.; C.J. Reddy, C.B. Ravipati, Applied EM Inc.
4. First Results of Baseband Wavefront Generation With a Digital Channel Matrix for Testing of CRPA: A. Hornbostel, H. Denks, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany; H. Venus,
DLR, Optical Information Systems, Germany

5. A Frequency Domain Quasi-Open Loop Tracking Loop for GNSS Receivers: E. Anyaegbu, University of Leeds, U.K.
6. The Development of a Professional Antenna for Galileo: R. Granger, P. Readman, S. Simpson, Roke Manor Research Ltd., U.K.
7. Test and Evaluation of a Digital Receiver in a Simulated Digital Antenna Electronics Environment: C.E. Pinkelman, R.A. Bixler, SPAWAR Systems Center, San Diego

1. Clock Errors Simulation and Characterisation: J. Diez, P. D´Angelo, A. Fernandez, Deimos Space S.L., Spain
2. Characterizing the Impact of Incorporating Two-Way Time Transfer Measurements on Network Differential GPS Position Solutions: K.L. B. Cook, J.F. Raquet, R. Beckman, Air Force Institute of Technology
3. A New Fine Tracking Algorithm for Binary Offset Carrier Modulated Signals: M. Musso, A.F. Cattoni, C.S. Regazzoni, University of Genova, Italy
4. Digital Spectral Separation Coefficient (SSC) for GNSS Signal to Noise Measurements and Interference Detection: D. Borio, L. Lo Presti, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; P. Mulassano, Istituto Superiore mario Boella, Italy
5. Estimation and Mitigation of Unmodeled Errors for a Pseudolite Based Reference System: J. Shockley, J. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology
6. Near Real-Time Carrier-Phase Multipath Mitigation in Kinematic Applications, Using a Dual-Antenna System and Effective Close Range Reflectors: L. Serrano, University of New Brunswick, Canada/ Leica Geosystems AG, Switzerland; D. Kim, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada
7. Particle Filtering Approach To Fault Detection and Isolation for GPS Integrity Monitoring: R. Rosihan, A. Indriyatmoko, S. Chun, D.H. Won, Y.J. Lee, T.S. Kang, Konkuk University, South Korea; J. Kim, Hankuk Aviation University, South Korea; H-s. Jun, Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Korea

1. An Integrity, Availability and Continuity Test Method for EGNOS/WAAS: H. Kannemans, National Aerospace Laboratory, The Netherlands
2. The Stanford - ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity: M. Tossaint, J. Samson, F. Toran, J. Ventura-Traveset, European Space Agency, The Netherlands; J. Sanz, M. Hernandez-Pajares, J.M. Juan, Technical University of Catalonia gAGE/UPC Spain
3. EGNOS: A Step Closer to Operational Qualification: A.W. Lyon, U. Guida, J.L. Fernandez, The European Satellite Services Provider, Belgium; O. Perrin, Skyguide
4. Performance Assessment of Time Difference Between EGNOS-Network-Time and UTC: J. Delporte, F. Mercier, M. Jeannot, J. Marechal, CNES, France; J.Y. Richard, P. Uhrich, Observatoire de Paris, France
5. WAAS Performance Improvements as a Result of WAAS Expansion: T. Schempp, S. Peck, W. Chou, E. Lopez, R. Hendrich, Raytheon
6. The Benefits of Multi-constellation GNSS Augmentations: I. Alcantarilla, D. Porras, A. Tajdine, N. Zarraoa, GMV S.A., Spain; D. Flament, JC. Lévy, Alcatel Alenia Space, France
7. A Single Frequency Approach to Mitigation of Ionospheric Depletion Events for SBAS in Equatorial Regions: S. Wu, S. Peck, T. Schempp, P. Shloss, H. Wan, P. Buckner, Raytheon; P. Doherty, Boston College; J. Angus, Claremont Graduate University
8. Development and Preliminary Test Results of Korean WADGPS Test Bed Using NDGPS Infrastructure in Korea: D. Kim, Y. Yun, B. Park, S. Jeon, Y. Sohn, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea

Alternates
1. Optimizing WAAS Accuracy/Stability For a Single Frequency Receiver: E. Kim, T. Walter, J.D. Powell, Stanford University
2. Analysis and Quality Study of GNSS Monitoring Ground Stations´ Pseudorange and Carrier-Phase Measurements: O. Julien, C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; J-L. Issler, CNES, France; O. Nouvel, W. Vigneau, M3Systems, France

1. GIOVE-A Signal In Space Test Activity at ESTEC: M. Spelat, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; M. Hollreiser, Galileo Project Office, ESA; M. Crisici, Radionavigation Engineering, ESA; M. Falcone, Galileo Project Office, ESA
2. Galileo Reference Receiver: S. Binda, G. Pinelli, Alcatel Alenia Space Italy; N. Gerein, NovAtel Inc., Canada
3. Solving the Correlation Ambiguity Issue of BOC Modulated Signal by a Nonlinear Quadratic Operator: V. Heiries, TeSA/Supaero, France; C. Rendon, V. Calmettes, Supaero, France
4. The GATE Receiver - A Full-Scale Galileo/GPS Monitor Receiver: T. Luck, E. Gohler, M. Bodenbach, J. Winkel, IfEN GmbH, Germany; F. Foerster, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits, Germany
5. The Galileo Mass Market Receiver - Progress of the GR-Poster Project: P.G. Mattos, ST Microelectronics, UK..
6. GAMMA - Assisted GALILEO/GPS/EGNOS Mass Market Receiver: G. Rohmer, O. Otaegui, S. Kohler, C. Fiermann, Fraunhofer IIS, Germany; G. Abwerzger, Teleconsult Austria; S. Haas, IMST GmbH; S. Corazza, Alenia Space; W Cresens, T. Vandeplas, Agilent Technologies; M. Villanti, University of Bologna
7. Achieving Theoretical Bounds for Receiver-Based Multipath Mitigation Using Galileo OS Signals: L.R. Weill, California State University, Fullerton / Comm Science Corporation/Magellan Systems Japan, Inc.
8. UERE Budget Results for the Galileo Test User Receiver: A. Fernandez. J. Diez, Deimos Space, Spain; C. Griffin, T. Sturman, QinetiQ; P. Joosten, Delft University of Technology; F. Boon, Septentrio Satellite Navigation; M. Hollreiser, European Space Agency

Alternates
1. Results of the GARDA Galileo Receiver Development and Evolution to Safety-Of-Life Receiver Applications: L. Marradi, G. Franzoni, D. Fossati, L. Foglia, Alcatel Alenia Space, Italy; V. Gabaglio, Galileo Joint Undertaking
2. A Galileo E1b,c RF Front-end Optimized for Narrowband Interferers Mitigation: F. Chastellain, C. Botteron, G. Waelchli, G. Zamuner, D. Manetti, P-A. Farine, University of Neuchatel, Switzerland; P. Brault, Martec Serpe-Lesm, France

1. Highway Lane Tracking Using GPS in Conjunction With Onboard IMU and Vision-based Lane Tracking Measurements: J.M. Clanton, D.M. Bevly, A.S. Hodel, Auburn University
2. Updating the Navigation Parameters by Direct Feedback From the Image Sensor in a Multi-sensor System: S. Moafipoor, The Ohio State University
3. Fusion of Low-Cost Imagining and Inertial Sensors for Navigation: M. Veth, J. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology
4. Use of Laser Range Scanners and 3D Laser Imaging Sensors for Precise Navigation in Unknown Environments: M. Uijt de Haag, A. Vadlamani, Ohio University
5. Range-Domain Integration of GPS and Laser-scanner Measurements for Outdoor Navigation: M. Joerger, B. Pervan, Illinois Institute of Technology
6. MetaSensor: Development of a Low-Cost, High Quality Attitude Heading Reference System: G.H. Elkaim, C. Foster, University of California - Santa Cruz
7. Saab TERNAV, an Algorithm for Real Time Terrain Navigation and Results From Flight Trials Using a Laser Altimeter: F. Neregard, N.K. Johansson, N.P. Johansson, K. Lundberg, B. Gabrielsson, Saab Bofors Dynamics, Sweden

Alternate
2. Dual Thread - Automatic Takeoff and Landing System (DT-ATLS): R. Harker, J. Gilligan, Sierra Nevada Corporation

1. Atmospheric Models Applied to DGPS and RTK Network in Brazil: Preliminary Results: J.F.Galera-Monico, D.B. Marra-Alves, L.F.A. Dalbelo, P.O. Camargo, Sao Paulo State University, Brazil; L.F. Sapucci, CPTEC/INPE, Brazil, L.P. Souto Fortes, IBGE, Brazil
2. Network-Based RTK-GPS Positioning System With Data Dissemination via Satellite Communication Link: H. Namie, National Defence Academy, Japan; O. Okamoto, Ibaraki College of Technology, Japan; C. Fan, A. Yasuda, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan
3. Development of a 3-D Tomography Approach to Provide Tropospheric Corrections for use in Network RTK Positioning: N. Nicholson, S. Skone, M.E. Cannon, The University of Calgary, Canada
4. Custom GPS-Correction Server for Real-Time Trajectography: H. Gontran, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland
5. Tropospheric Bias Interpolation for Network Real-Time Kinematic GPS: P.M. Grgich, A. Kealy, C. Gordini, M. Hale, The University of Melbourne, Australia
6. A Performance Analysis of Sparse GNSS CORS Networks for Real Time Centimetric Level Positioning: A Case Study in Victoria, Australia: C. Gordini, A. Kealy, P. Grgich, The University of Melbourne, Australia; M. Hale, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Australia
7. Real-time Ionospheric and Atmospheric Corrections for Wide Area Single Frequency Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution: C. Rocken, Z. Lukes, L. Mervart, J. Johnson, T. Iwabuchi, GPS Solutions Inc.; M. Kanzaki, Nippon GPS Solutions Corp., Japan
8. Alternatives to Current GPS-RTK Services: C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia; J. van Cranenbroeck, Leica Geosystems, Switzerland

Alternate
2. The Use of a GPS Test Network for Real Time Application in Italy: First Results Based on Regional Field Test: M. Barbarella, S. Gandolfi, E. Ronci, Universita di Bologna, Italy

1. Exploiting the Orthogonality of L2C Code Delays for a Fast Acquisition: A.R.A. Moghaddam, R. Watson, G. Lachapelle, J. Nielsen, The University of Calgary, Canada
2. Code Acquisition Techniques for the Galileo Safety-of-Life Receiver: J.S. Silva, Deimos Engenharia, S.A., Portugal; J. Diez, A. Fernandez, Deimos Space S.L., Spain; L. Marradi, G. Franzoni, I. Palmiero, Alcatel Alenia Space, Italy; V. Gabaglio, Galileo Joint Undertaking
3. Coherent Integration of Future GNSS Signals: R.T. Ioannides, L.E. Aguado, University of Leeds, U.K.; G. Brodin, Pathtrack Ltd.
4. An Initial Synchronization Method for DGPS Reference Receivers in Noisy Environment: S.H. Park, D.J. Cho, S. Oh, S.H. Suh, Korea Ocean Research & Development Institute, South Korea
5. General Framework for Acquisition Performance Analysis With Application to GALILEO Signals: A. Konovaltsev, H. Denks, A. Hornbostel, German Aerospace Center, (DLR) , Germany; M. Soellner, M. Witzke, EADS Astrium, Germany
6. A New Three Dimensional Signal Search & Acquisiton Algorithm Based on Cross-correlation Sequence with 0.1 Seconds' Signal Receiving Time: H. So, Seoul National University, South Korea; H. Jun, Samsung, South Korea; C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea
7. Pre-Correlation Noise and Interference Suppression for Use in Direct-Sequence Spread Spectrum Systems With Periodic PRN Codes: S.K. Shanmugam, J. Nielsen, G. Lachapelle, R. Watson, The University of Calgary, Canada
8. Experimental Tests of Unaided Weak Signal Acquisition Methods Using a Software Receiver: G. Heckler, J.L. Garrison, Purdue University

Alternates
1. A Rapid Code State Computing Algorithm for L2C Code Phase Control: D. Wang, H. Kondo, O. Arai, Furuno Electric Co., Ltd., Japan
1. GPS Acquisition Solution for use Cases in all Types of Environments: H. El Natour, ENAC/TeSA, France; A-C. Escher, C. Macabiau, O. Julien, ENAC, France; M. Monnerat, Alcatel Alenia Space, France

1. Statistics of Occurrence of Ionospheric Scintillation and TEC Depletions Over Indian Region and its Effect on Satellite Navigation: S.M. Regar, S. Sunda, Airports Authority of India; M.R. Sivaraman, K. Bandyopadhyay, Space Applications Centre, India
2. PLL Performance for GPS Signals in the Presence of Phase Noise, Thermal Noise and Ionospheric Scintillation: W. Yu, G. Lachapelle, S. Skone, The University of Calgary, Canada
3. Real Time MSTID Modeling on Wide Area and Regional Networks and Improvement of Precise GNSS Navigation: M. Hernandez-Pajares, J.M. Juan, J. Sanz, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain
4. Observed GPS and WAAS Signal-to-Noise Degradation Due to Solar Radio Bursts: A. Cerruti, Cornell University
5. Bounding Higher Order Ionosphere Errors for the Dual Frequency GPS User: S. Datta-Barua, T. Walter, J. Blanch, P. Enge, Stanford University
6. Detection and Mitigation of Geomagnetic Pulsation Effects Using GPS: S. Skone, N. Nicholson, The University of Calgary, Canada
7. Performance Analysis of Software Based GPS Receiver Using a Generic Ionospheric Scintillation Model: L. Dyrud, N. Bhatia, S. Ganguly, A. Jovancevic, Center for Remote Sensing, Inc.

Alternates
1. Ambiguity Resolution Under Known Base Vector Length: A.A. Povalyaev, Javad GNSS, Russia; I.A. Sorokina, Risde, Russia; P.B. Glukhov, Moscow Aviation Institute, Russia
2. The Ionospheric Impact on GPS Performance in Southern Polar Region: D.A. Grejner-Brzezinska, C-K. Hong, N. Arslan, M. Willis, The Ohio State University; L. Hothem, United States Geological Survey
3. The Effect of 2D & 3D Ionospheric Model in Interfrequency Bias Estimation: Y. Sohn, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea; H. Rho, R. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada

1. GPS/INS/G Sensors/Yaw Rate Sensor/Wheel Speed Sensors Integrated Vehicular Positioning System: J. Gao, The University of Calgary, Canada
2. Analysis of Improvement to Two-Wheel Robot Navigation Using Low-Cost GPS/INS Aids: B.J. Clark, D.M. Bevly, Auburn University; S. Farritor, Auburn University/University of Nebraska
3. The Overbot: An Off-Road Autonomous Ground Vehicle Testbed: G.H. Elkaim, J. Connors, University of California - Santa Cruz; J. Nagel, Animatics Inc.
4. GPS-Based Relative Positioning Test Platform for Automotive Active Safety Systems: C. Basnayake, C.C. Kellum, General Motors; J. Sinko, J. Strus, SRI International
5. Phase Ambiguity Resolution Based on Linear Modeling of DD Carrier Phase: M. Saeki, T. Kosaka, S. Kaneko, Tokyo University of Science, Japan
6. Analyzing the Dynamic Behavior of Suspension Bridge Towers Using GPS: A.P.C. Larocca, R.E. Schaal, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil; M.C. Santos, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick, Canada
7. A Solution to Tough GNSS Land Applications Using Terrestrial-based Transceivers (LocataLites): J. Barnes, C. Rizos, M. Kanli, A. Pahwa, University of New South Wales / Locata Corporation Pty Ltd., Australia
8. Positioning for Range-Based Land Navigation Systems Using Surface Topography: J.H. Amt, J.F. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology

Alternates
1. How Constellation Design Affects GPS Users in Mountainous Terrain: P. Massatt, F. Fritzen, S Scuro, K. O´Neill, The Aerospace Corporation
2. The Development of A MEMS-Based Inertial/GPS System for Land-Vehicle Navigation Applications: X. Niu, S. Nassar, Z. Syed, C. Goodall, N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada

1. Estimated Code Generation Scheme and Property Analysis of Broadcast Galileo L1 Signal: G.X. Gao, J. Spilker, T. Walter, P. Enge, Stanford University; T. Pratt, Parthus, Ltd., U.K.
2. GIOVE-A In Orbit Testing Results: M. Falcone, M. Lugert, M. Malik, M. Crisci, European Space Agency, The Netherlands; E. Rooney, C. Jackson, M. Threteway, SSTL
3. Performance Assessment of Galileo Ranging Signals Transmitted by GSTB-V2 Satellites : A. Simsky, J-M. Sleewaegen, Septentrio, Belgium; M. Hollreiser, M. Crisci, ESA/ESTEC, Netherlands
4. Analysis of GIOVE-A L1-Signals: S. Graf, C. Gunther, German Aerospace Center (DLR) / Technische Universitat Munchen, Germany
5. Searching for Galileo: M.L. Psiaki, T.E. Humphreys, S. Mohiuddin, S.P. Powell, A.P. Cerruti, P.M. Kintner, Cornell University
6. First Test Results of the German Galileo Test and Development Environment - GATE: G. Heinrichs, E. Loehnert, E. Wittmann, IfEN GmbH, Germany
7. Impact of the Spreading Codes onto the S-Curve Bias for the Galileo E5 Signals: F. Soualle, EADS Astrium GmbH, Germany
8. Signal Distortions at GNSS Payload Level: E. Rebeyrol, C. Macabiau, O. Julien, ENAC/TeSA, France; L. Ries, J-L. Issler, CNES, France; M. Bousquet, SUPAERO, France; M-L. Boucheret, ENSEEIHT, France

1. Adaptive Particle Filter for INS/GPS Integration: P. Aggarwal, D. Gu, N. El-Sheimy, University of Calgary, Canada
2. A Numerical Procedure for Approximating Overbounds on Navigation Systems Error Distributions: G. Phanomchoeng, D. Gebre-Egziabher, University of Minnesota; J.H. Rife, Stanford University
3. GPS/INS Integration Based on Recursive Least Square Lattice: M. El-Gizawy, University of Calgary, Canada; A. Noureldin, Royal Military College of Canada; N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada
4. Comparison of the Extended and Sigma-point Kalman Filters on Inertial Sensor Bias Estimation through Tight Integration of GPS and INS: Y. Li, J. Wang, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia
5. Development of a Multi-sensor Navigation Filter for High Accuracy Positioning in all Environments: C. Hide, T. Moore, C. Hill, University of Nottingham, U.K.
6. An ANFIS-KF Hybrid Scheme for Faster IMU Alignment: Y-W. Huang, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
7. New Developments in State Estimation for INS/GPS Integrated Systems: M. El-Diasty, York University, Canada; A. El-Rabbany, Ryerson University, Canada; S. Pagiatakis, York University, Canada
8. Intelligent Integration of a MEMS IMU With GPS Using a Reliable Weighting Scheme: C. Goodall, The University of Calgary, Canada

Alternates
1. Fuzzy Enhancement of GPS - INS Synergy: A. Hiliuta, R. Landry Jr, F. Gagnon, Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Canada
2. A Modified Kalman Filter for Hybrid Positioning: S. Ali-Loytty, N. Sirola, Tampere University of Technology, Finland

1. New Findings on Land Mobile Satellite Multipath Navigation Performance: A. Steingass, A. Lehner, German Aerospace Center, Germany
2. Capture, Analysis and Mitigation of Multipath in a High Sensitivity GPS Receiver: J. Bickerstaff, R. Frayling-Cork, T. Haddrell, Glonav UK Ltd., U.K.
3. On the Multifractal Nature of Pseudorange Local Errors: M. van den Bossche, Alcatel Alenia Space, France
4. Bounds on Signal Performance Regarding Multipath-estimating Discriminators: J.A. Avila-Rodriguez, T. Pany, G.W. Hein, University FAF Munich, Germany
5. Performance Limits of Multi-path Mitigation for Short Delay: A. Pratt, QinetiQ Ltd., U.K.
6. Multipath Mitigation Using Particle Filtering: P. Closas, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Spain; C. Fernandez-Prades, Centre Tecn. de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya, Spain; J.A. Fernandez-Rubio, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Spain; A. Ramirez-Gonzalez, University of the Mixteca, Mexico
7. Maximum Likelihood Multipath Estimation in Comparison with Conventional Delay Lock Loops: M. Lentmaier, B. Krach, DLR, Germany
8. Neural Networks Algorithms Prototyping to Mitigate GNSS Multipath for LEO Positioning Applications: W. Vigneau, O. Nouvel, M3 Systems, France; M. Manzano-Jurado, C. Carrascosa Sanz, GMV S.A. Spain; H. Abdulkader, D. Roviras, TeSA, France; J.M. Juan, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Spain; C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; P. Holsters, ESA, The Netherlands

Alternates
1. Particle Filter for Reduced Multipath Error Parameters Estimation: A. Indriytamoko, Rosihan, D.H. Won, S. Chun, T. Kang, Y.J. Lee, Konkuk University, South Korea; E. Lee, University of California, Los Angeles;J.R. Kim, Hankuk Aviation University, South Korea; H-S. Jun, Korea Aerospace Research Institute, South Korea
2. Statistical Determination of the PR Error Due to NLOS-Multipath in Urban Canyons: R. Ercek, P. De Doncker, F. Grenez, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
3. Simulation-based Estimation of Multipath Mitigation Using 3D-GIS and Spatial Statistics: Y-W. Lee, The University of Tokyo, Japan; Y. Suh, Pukyoung National University, Korea; R. Shibasaki, The University of Tokyo, Japan
4. Two-element Vertical Antenna for Multipath Mitigation in Field Conditions: A. Veitsel, M. Vorobiev, A. Zhdanov, S. Pushkarev, Topcon Positioning Systems, Russia

1. Comparison of Vector-Based Software Receiver Implementations With Application to Ultra-Tight GPS/INS Integration: M.G. Petovello, G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada
2. On the Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Position: P. Closas, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Spain; C. Fernandez-Prades, Ctr. Tecnologic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya, Spain; J.A. Fernandez-Rubio, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Spain; A. Ramirez-Gonzalez, Univ. of the Mixteca, Mexico
3. Cross Correlation Mitigation by Adaptive Orthogonalization Using Constraints - New Results: E. P. Glennon, SigNav Pty Ltd., & University of New South Wales, Australia; A.G. Dempster, University of New South Wales, Australia
4. Implementation and Analysis of Acquisition and Tracking Algorithms for BOC Signals: S. Chen, K-H. Thiel, A. Kleusberg, University of Stuttgart, Germany
5. A New Unambiguous Low-Complexity BOC Tracking Technique: D. de Castro, J. Diez, A. Fernandez, Deimos Space, S.L., Spain; J-M. Sleewaegen, Septentrio Satellite Navigation, Japan
6. An Algorithm For Bit Synchronization And Signal Tracking In Software GNSS Receivers: M. Anghileri, T. Pany, J-H. Won, G. Hein, University FAF Munich, Germany
7. Analysis of the One-Pole Notch Filter for Interference Mitigation: Wiener Solution and Loss Estimations: D. Borio, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; L. Camoriano, P. Mulassano, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy
8. The Implications of Simultaneous Processing of the Galileo L1b/c Signals: P.G. Mattos, ST Microelectronics, U.K.

Alternates
1. Coherent Processing Techniques for YMCA++ Receivers in Different Environments: N. Bhatia, A. Jovancevic, A. Brown, S. Ganguly, Center for Remote Sensing, Inc.
2. Is It Really Necessary for GPS Receivers to Store Both Ephemeredes and Almanacs?: G. Xie, R. Vohra, X. Yuan, SiRF Technology, Inc.

1. Influence Analysis of Tropospheric Model and Mapping Function on Precise Tropospheric Delay Estimation Using PPP: Y. Zhang, Y. Gao, University of Calgary, Canada
2. Atmospheric Moisture Estimation Using GPS on a Moving Platform: S. Skone, Y. Gao, O. al-Fanek, W. Tao, Y. Zhang, The University of Calgary, Canada; P. Heroux, P. Collins, Natural Resources, Canada
3. PPP and Network True Real-time 30 sec Estimation of ZTD in Dense and Giant Regional GPS Network and the Application of ZTD for Nowcasting of Heavy Rainfall: T. Iwabuchi, C. Rocken, Z. Lukes, L. Mervart , J. Johnson, GPS Solutions Inc.; M. Kanzaki, Nippon GPS Solutions Corp., Japan
4. Wide Area Neutral Atmosphere Models for GNSS Applications: R.F. Leandro, M.C. Santos, R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick Canada
5. Local Tropospheric Anomaly Effects on GPS RTK Performance: Y.W. Ahn, D. Kim, P. Dare, University of New Brunswick, Canada
7. Comparison of IGS and Radiosonde Determination of ZTD in the Canadian Arctic: R. Ghoddousi-Fard, University of New Brunswick, Canada
8. Comparing Various GPS Neutral Atmospheric Delay Mitigation Strategies: A High Latitude Experiment: R. Ghoddousi-Fard, P. Dare, University of New Brunswick, Canada

1. Monitoring of Vessels Using a GNSS Receiver Network: F.M. Belanger, A.R.L. Tatnall, University of Southampton, U.K.
2. Experimental Evaluation of Maritime Position Communication System Using Low Power Radio Synchronized by PPS Signal of a GPS Receiver: M. Yoshida, Salesian Polytechnic, Japan; H. Hojo, C. Fan, A. Yasuda, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan
3. Direct Measurement Based H-infinity Controller Synthesis for an Autonomous Surface Vehicle: G.H. Elkaim, R. Kelbley, University of California - Santa Cruz
4. Monitor and User Receivers for Differential Loran: B. Peterson, K. Dykstra, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning, LLC
5. Ionospheric Warning System for Marine DGPS Users: S. Skone, University of Calgary, Canada
6. Implementation of Ionosphere and Troposphere Models for High-Precision GPS Positioning of a Buoy During Hurricane Katrina: D. Dodd, University of Southern Mississippi; .S. Bisnath, York University, Canada; S. Howden, University of Southern Mississippi
7. Numerical Weather Models for Tropospheric Mitigation in Marine Kinematic GPS: a Daylong Analysis: F.G. Nievinski, University of New Brunswick, Canada
8. A Procedure for Creating Optimal ASF Grids for Harbor Entrance & Approach.: G. Johnson, Alion Science & Technology; P. Swaszek, University of Rhode Island; R. Hartnett, USCG Academy; K. Shmihluk, USCG Loran Support Unit

Alternates
1. Simulation Result of Measurement for Oceanic Wavelength by Sea Surface Reflected GPS Signal: S. Okuda, Y. Arai, Marine Technical College, Japan; N. Kouguchi, Kobe University, Japan
2. Analysis of Pseudolite Augmented Precise Positioning Performance for Vessel Berthing: D-J. Cho, S-H. Park, S. Oh, S-H. Suh, Korea Ocean Research & Development Institute, South Korea
3. Maritime Demonstration Testbed for Galileo: C.S. Dixon, R.G. Morrison, EADS Astrium Ltd., U.K.
4. A Study on the Design of the Vessel Identification System: S. Oh, D. Cho, S.H. Park, S. Suh, Korea Ocean Research & Development Institute, South Korea

1. High-accurate GLONASS Orbit and Clock Determination for the Assessment of System Performance: E.G. Oleynik, V.V. Mitrikas, S.G. Revnivykh, A.I. Serdukov, E.N. Dutov, V.F. Shiriaev, Central Research Institute of Machine Building (TSNIIMash), Russia
2. Description of the L1C Signal: J. Betz, M. Blanco, MITRE; C. Cahn, Independent Consultant; P. Dafesh, Aerospace; C. Hegarty, MITRE; K. Hudnut, USGS; A. Jones, GPS JPO; V. Kasemsri, MITRE; R. Keegan, Independent Consultant; K. Kovach, ARINC; S. Lenahan, GPS JPO; H. Ma, J. Rushanan, MITR
3. Status of QZSS Navigation System in Japan: S. Kogure, M. Sawabe, M. Kishimoto, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Japan
4. Russian System for Differential Correction and Monitoring: A Concept and Results of the First Phase of Development: S. Averin, V. Dvorkin, S. Karutin, V. Kurshin, U. Urlichich, Russian Institute of Space Device Engineering, Russia; V. Klimov, Federal Space Agency, Russia
5. NGA´s Role in GPS: B. Wiley, D. Craig, D. Manning, J. Novak, R. Taylor, L. Weingarth, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
6. Remote Clock Synchronization Using Geostationary Satellite for Japanese Quasi-Zenith Satellite System: N. Takasaki, A. Iwasaki, The University of Tokyo, Japan; T. Iwata, M. Imae, T. Suzuyama, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan
7. Performance Analysis of GPS Augmentation Using Quasi-Zenith Satellite System in Local Japan Area: Y. Zhang, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology / GEOSURF Corporation, Japan
8. A Comprehensive Trade Study on GPS Constellation Size and Number of Orbit Planes: P.D. Massatt, F.E. Fritzen, S.R. Scuro, K.M. O'Neill, The Aerospace Corporation

1. Integrated GPS/INS System for Pedestrian Navigation in a Signal Degraded Environment: S. Godha, G. Lachapelle, M.E. Cannon, The University of Calgary, Canada
2. An Intelligent Real-Time MEMS IMU/HSGPS Integrated Vehicular Navigation System and Road Test Results: J-H. Wang, Y. Gao, The University of Calgary, Canada
3. A Neural-KF Hybrid Sensor Fusion Scheme for INS/GPS/Odometer Integrated Land Vehicular Navigation System: Y-C. Lin, Y-W. Huang, K-W. Chiang, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
4. Tightly-coupled GPS/INS Integration Using Unscented Kalman Filter and Particle Filter: Y. Yi, D.A. Grejner-Brzezinska, The Ohio State University
5. Improving GPS Receiver Tracking Performance of PLL by MEMS IMU Aiding: Y. Yang, N. El-Sheimy, University of Calgary, Canada
6. Multi-sensor Inertial Navigation Systems Employing Skewed Redundant Inertial Sensors: A. Osman, B. Wright, The University of Calgary, Canada; A. Noureldin, Royal Military College of Canada; N. El-Sheimy, The University of Calgary, Canada
7. Filter Designed for GPS-Aided Inertial Navigation System Based on Linear Accelerometers: W. Junwei, L. Jinfeng, Z. Yunan, Y. Na, Harbin Engineering University, China
8. Control of Wheeled Robots Using GNSS and Inertial Navigation: Control Law Synthesis and Experimental Results: L. Rapoport, M. Gribkov, A. Khvalkov, A. Pesterev, M. Tkachenko, Javad GNSS, Russia

Alternate
1. Development of a GPS/INS Integrated System on the Field Programmable Gate Array Platform: Y. Li, P. Mumford, J. Wang, C. Rizos, University of New South Wales, Australia

1. Statistical Inference Technique in Pre-Correlation Interference Detection in GPS Receivers: A.T. Balaei, University of New South Wales, Australia
2. A Technique of Interference Monitoring in GNSS Applications, Based on ACF and Prony Methods: B. Motella, L. Lo Presti, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; M. Leonardi, Tor Vergata University, Roma
3. Mitigating Pulsed Interference Using Frequency Domain Adaptive Filtering: M. Raimondi, O. Julien, C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; F. Bastide, SOFREAVIA/DTI, France
4. Satellite-to-Satellite Interference Effects Observed in High-Rate C/A-Code Power Measurements: T.L. Beach, C.A. Baragona, Air Force Research Laboratory

1. Wide Area Based Precise Point Positioning: R.F. Leandro, M.C. Santos, University of New Brunswick, Canada
2. Handling of the Tropospheric Delay in Kinematic Precise Point Positioning: N.S. Kjorsvik, TerraTec AS, Norway; J.G.O. Gjevestad , O. Ovstedal, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway
3. StarFire: A Global SBAS for Sub-Decimeter Precise Point Positioning: K. Dixon, NavCom Technology
4. Development of a Real-Time Single-Frequency Precise Point Positioning System and Road Test Results: Y. Gao, Y. Zhang, K. Chen, The University of Calgary, Canada

Alternate
1. A Single Frequency PPP Algorithm Based on GR Models: S. Fujita, Y. Kubo, S. Sugimoto, Ritsumeikan University, Japan

1. Performance Testing of a Real-Time Software-Based GPS Receiver for x86 Processors: S. Charkhandeh, M.G. Petovello, G. Lachapelle, The University of Calgary, Canada
2. A Real-Time Software Receiver for the GPS and Galileo L1 Signals: B.M. Ledvina, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; M.L. Psiaki, T.E. Humphreys, S.P. Powell, P.M. Kintner, Cornell University
3. Implementing a GPS Waveform Under the Software Communications Architecture: A. Brown, D. Babich, NAVSYS Corporation
4. Generalized Frequency-Domain Correlator for Software GPS Receiver: Preliminary Test Results and Analysis: C. Yang, Sigtem Technology, Inc.; M. Miller, T. Nguyen, AFRL/SNRN; D. Akos, University of Colorado
5. A Hybrid Architecture for High Sensitivity Standalone and Assisted Galileo/GPS Receivers: O. Otaegui, N. Lucas, G. Rohmer, Fraunhofer IIS, Germany
6. GNSS Receiver Implementation on a DSP: Status, Challenges, and Prospects: T.E. Humphreys, M.L. Psiaki, P.M. Kintner, Cornell University; B.M. Ledvina, University of Texas at Austin
7. A Flexible Galileo E1 Receiver Platform for the Validation of Low Power and Rapid Acquisition Schemes: C. Botteron, G. Walchli, G. Zamuner, M. Frei, D. Manetti, F. Chastellain, P-A. Farine, University of Neuchatel, Switzerland; P. Brault, Martec Serpe-Iesm, France
8. Design of a Unified MLE Tracking for Multi-Frequency GPS/Galileo Software Receivers: J-H. Won, T. Pany, B. Eissfeller , University FAF Munich, Germany

Alternate
1. An Efficient New Method of Doppler Removal and Correlation with Application to Software-Based GNSS Receivers: M.G. Petovello, G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Canada

1. How to Optimize GNSS Signals and Codes for Indoor Positioning: J.A. Avila-Rodriguez, S. Wallner, G.W. Hein, University FAF Munich, Germany
2. Block-Accumulating Coherent Integration over Extended Interval (BACIX) for Weak GPS Signal Acquisition: C. Yang, Sigtem Technology, Inc.; S. Han, Centrality Communications, Inc.
3. Performance Evaluation of a Differential Approach Based Detector: W. Yu, The University of Calgary, Canada
4. Improving GPS L1 C/A Code Correlation Properties Using a Novel Multi-correlator Differential Detection Technique: S.K. Shanmugam, The University of Calgary, Canada
5. The Performance and Simulation of a C-CDMA Pseudolite Indoor Geolocation System: l.F. Progri, J. Maynard, California State Polytechnic University; W.R. Michalson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; J. Wang, University of New South Wales, Australia
6. An Indoor Positioning System Using Time-Delayed GPS Repeater: S-H. Im, G-I. Jee, Y-B. Cho, Konkuk University, South Korea
7. 2D Indoor Dynamic Positioning Using GNSS Based Repeaters: A. Vervisch-Picois, A. Bideau, GET/INT, Evry, France; M. Jeannot, CNES, France; N. Samama, GET/INT Evry, France
8. The NordNav Indoor GNSS Reference Receiver: A. Mitelman, P-L. Normark, M. Reidevall, J. Thor, Nordnav Technologies AB, Sweden; O. Gronqvist, L. Magnusson, TeliaSonera AB, Sweden

1. The GPS Space Service Volume: F.H. Bauer, M.C. Moreau, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; M.E. Dahle-Melsaether, W.P. Petrofski, B.J. Stanton, S. Thomason, SI International, Inc., / HQ Air Force Space Command; G.A Harris, R.P. Sena, L. Parker Temple, The Aerospace Corporation
2. Real-Time Sub-cm Differential Orbit Determination of Two Low-Earth Orbiters With GPS Bias Fixing: S-C. Wu, Y.E. Bar-Sever, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
3. Land and Ice Remote Sensing from Low Earth Orbit Using GNSS Bi-static Radar: S. Gleason, Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd. / University of Surrey, U.K.; D. Masters, University of Colorado Boulder
4. Analysis of Signal Availability in the GPS Space Service Volume: B.J. Stanton, SI International Systems / HQ Air Force Space Command; L. Parker Temple III, C.E. Edgar, The Aerospace Corporation
5. The GIOVE-A Satellite: From Design to in-orbit Commissioning: G. Gatti, A. Garutti, G. Mandorlo, European Space Agency, The Netherlands; J. Paffet, A. Bradford, E. Rooney, SSTL
6. Real Time GPS Positioning of LEO Satellites Mitigating Pseudorange Multipath Through Neural Networks: P. Ramos-Bosch, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain
7. GPS Receiver With Soft-correlator Approach for Leo-Orbits: G. Vyasaraj, R. Vishwanath, R. Nayak, Accord Software & Systems Pvt. Ltd., India
8. A Dual Frequency GPS Receiver (L1/L2c or L1/Lp) for Space Applications in LEO and GEO Orbit : S. Serre, C. Mehlen, C. Boyer, Alcatel Alenia Space, France; P. Holsters, G. Seco-Granados, A. Garcia-Rodriguez, European Space Agency (ESA), The Netherlands; J-L. Issler, M. Grondin, French Space Agency, CNES, France

Alternates
1. Autonomous Formation Flying RF Sensor Development for the PRISMA Mission : L. Lestarquit, J. Harr, T. Grelier, E. Peragin, CNES, France; N. Wilhelm, C. Mehlen, C. Peyrotte, Alcatel Alenia Space, France
2. Integrated Adjustment of LEO and GPS With PANDA in Precision Orbit Determination: C. Shi, J. Geng, J. Liu, GNSS Center, Wuhan University, China; M. Ge, GFZ Potsdam, Telegrafenberg A17

1. On the use of Multiconstellation-RAIM for Aircraft Approaches: P.B. Ober, Integricom, The Netherlands; D. Harriman, Lockheed Martin STASYS Ltd.
2. Further Development of Galileo-GPS RAIM for Vertical Guidance: A. Ene, Stanford University
3. Receiver Integrity Monitoring in Case of Multiple Failures: I. Martini, R. Wolf, G.W.Hein, IfEN Gmbh, Germany
4. Sequential RAIM Designed to Detect Combined Step Ramp Pseudo-Range Error: A. Clot, C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; I. Nikiforov, UTT; B. Roturier, DGAC DSNA/DTI/SO, France
5. GALILEO Integrity: The Ground Segment Computation Algorithm Perspective: C. Hernandez, C. Catalan, M. A. Fernandez, A. J. Gavin, E. Sardon, J. R. Martin, GMV S.A., Spain
6. The Need for Developing Global Integrity Standards and the Opportunity of a Global Multi-constellation Service: Hu. Favin-Leveque, B. Boutteau, EADS Space Services, France; H. Trantenberg, EADS Astrium, Germany
7. A General Method for Accurate Assessment of GNSS FD/FDE Holes: S. Feng, W.Y. Ochieng, Imperial College London, U.K.
8. Making GNSS Integrity Simple and Efficient - A New Concept Based on Signal-in-Space Error Bounds: J. Mach, I. Deuster, R. Wolf, W. Werner, IfEN Gmbh, Germany

2. Characterization of Inertial Sensor Measurements for Navigation Performance Analysis: J.H. Wall, D.M. Bevly, Auburn University
3. IADIRA: Inertial Aided Deeply Integrated Receiver Architecture: P.F. da Silva, J.S. Silva, A. Caramagno, Deimos Engenharia S.A., Portugal; M. Wis, M. Eulalia Pares, I. Colomina, Institut de Geomatica, Portugal; A. Fernandez, J. Diez, Deimos Space, Portugal; V. Gabaglio, Galileo Joint Undertaking
4. A Software Defined Real-time Ultra-tightly Coupled (UTC) GNSS-INS Architecture: J. Noronha, A. Jovancevic, W. Woessner, S. Ganguly, Center for Remote Sensing, Inc.
5. A Man Motion Navigation System Using High Sensitivity GPS, MEMS IMU and Auxiliary Sensors: C.J. Mather,P.D. Groves, M.R. Carter, QinetiQ, U.K.
6. Enhanced MEMS-INS/GPS(L1/L2C) Integrated System: S.Y. Cho, B.D. Kim, Y.S. Cho, W.S. Choi, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, South Korea
7. Stochastic and Geometric Observability of Aided Inertial Navigation: Y. Shao, D. Gebre-Egziabher, University of Minnesota Twin Cities
8. Performance Studies of Nonlinear Filtering Methods in INS/GPS In-Motion Alignment: M. Nishiyama, S. Fujioka, Y. Kubo, T. Sato, S. Sugimoto, Ritsumeikan University, Japan

1. Sub-millimeter Precision GPS Survey System at the Holloman High Speed Test Track: J. Clark Hughes, J.A. Banks, A.J. Kerkhoff, B.W. Tolman, J.R. Wyant, The University of Texas at Austin; R.E. Ellison, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
2. Core Wall Survey Control System: D.M. Hayes, Samsung Besix Arabtech, UAE; I.R. Sparks, Connell Wagner, Australia; J. van Cranenbroeck, Leica Geosystems AG, Switzerland
3. Modernizing the Brazilian Active Control Network: L.P.S. Fortes, S.M.A. Costa, M.A.A. Lima, J.A. Fazan, Brazilian Institute of Geography & Statistics, Brazil; J.F. Galera-Monico, Sao Paulo State University, Brazil; M. C. Santos, University of New Brunswick, Canada; P. Tetreault, Natural Resources Canada
4. Comparison of Tropospheric Decorrelation Errors in the Presence of Severe Weather Conditions in Different Areas and Over Different Baseline Lengths: J. Huang, F. van Graas, Ohio University
5. Self-Calibrating Receivers for Precision Phase Observations: S. Ganguly, N. Bhatia, A. Jovancevic, A. Brown, M. Kirchner, D. Saxena, J. Noronha, S. Zigic, Center for Remote Sensing, Inc.
6. Geodetic Antenna Calibration Test in the Antarctic Environment: D.A. Grejner-Brzezinska, E. Vazquez, The Ohio State University; L. Hothem, United States Geological Survey
7. Tropospheric Effects in Monitoring Super High Buildings With GPS: W.J. Dai X.L. Ding, Z.W. Li, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong; K.C.S. Kwok, S. Campbell, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
8. Assessment of Digital Terrain Models for Multipath Prediction at Geodetic GNSS Installations: J.P. Weiss, P. Axelrad, S. Anderson, University of Colorado, Boulder

Alternates
1. A Non-differential Approach to the Estimation of GNSS-derived Accelerations. Galileo´s Foreseen Impact on Airborne Gravimetry: J.J. Rosales, I. Colomina, Institute of Geomatics, Spain
2. Using SmartStation and GPS integrated with INS to Map Underground Pipes and Cables: A .Taha, X. Meng, G. W. Roberts, C. Hide, J-P. Montillet, The University of Nottingham, U.K.

1. Integrating the GP2021 and Linux in Open Source GPS: F.A. Niles, Consultant
2. The Namuru Open GNSS Research Receiver: P.J. Mumford, K. Parkinson, A. Dempster, The University of New South Wales, Australia
3. Block-Repetitive Iterated Processing for Software GPS Receiver: Dichotomized Search of Correlation Peak: C. Yang, Sigtem Technology, Inc.; M. Miller, T. Nguyen, AFRL/SNRN
4. Open Signals, Open Software: Two Years of Collaborative Analysis Using the GPS Toolkit: R.B. Harris, T. Craddock, T. Conn, T. Gaussiran, E. Hagen, A. Hughes, J. Little, R. Mach, S. Nelsen, B. Renfro, B. Tolman, ARL/The University of Texas at Austin
5. Geodetic Baseline GPS Processing by a Simple Sequential Technique: M. Vermeer, M. Vaisanen, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
6. GeoZigBee: A Wireless GPS Wristwatch Tracking Solution: A. Brown, P. Brown, J. Griesbach, NAVSYS Corporation; T. Boult, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
7. Extended Kalman Filter-Based Deeply Integrated GNSS/Low-Cost INS for Reliable Navigation Under GNSS Weak Interrupted Signal Conditions: N.I. Ziedan, Zagazig University, Egypt
8. Testing GPS L5 Acquisition and Tracking Algorithms Using a Hardware Simulator: C. Mongredien, G. Lachapelle, M.E. Cannon, The University of Calgary, Canada

Alternates
1. Generalization of the Dual Frequency Method of Multipath Calibration for Global Reference Networks: R.B. Harris, E.G. Lightsey, The University of Texas at Austin
2. Providing Corrections From Space Based Augmentation System to Non-Aviation Users via Internet: S-S. Jan, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

1. Theoretical and Practical Sensitivity Limits for Assisted GNSS Receivers Using Legacy and Future GNSS Signals: L.R. Weill, California State University, Fullerton / Magellan Systems Japan, Inc.
2. Innovative Techniques for GPS Indoor Positioning Using a Snapshot Receiver: D. Jimenez-Banos, N. Blanco-Delgado, G. Lopez-Risueno, G. Seco-Granados, A. Garcia-Rodriguez, European Space Agency, ESA, The Netherlands
3. Evaluation of Assisted GPS (AGPS) Performance Using Simulator and Field Tests: S. Singh, The University of Calgary, Canada
4. Continuous Fine Time Aiding to a GPS Receiver in Tracking Mode in a GSM Terminal: P. Duffett-Smith, P. Hansen, Cambridge Positioning Systems Ltd., U.K.; T. Pratt, Orbstar Consultants, U.K.; R. Faragher, University of Cambridge, U.K.
5. INS-Assisted High Sensitivity GPS Receivers For Degraded Signal Navigation: G. Gao, G. Lachapelle, The University of Calgary, Canada
6. Real Time Pedestrian Navigation System: D. Kubrak, C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; M. Monnerat, Alcatel Alenia Space, France
7. Indoor Navigation Test Results using an Integrated GPS/TOA/Inertial Navigation System: A. Brown, Y. Lu, NAVSYS Corporation
8. Personal Navigation in a Networked Environment : S. Rounds, L-3 Communications/Interstate Elec.

Alternates
1. Performance Measures in Assisted GPS: S. Strickland, B. Tarlow, SiGe Semiconductor (Europe) Ltd., U.K.
2. Comparative A-GPS and 3G-Matrix Testing in a Dense Urban Environment: P. Duffett-Smith, R. Rowe, Cambridge Positioning Systems Ltd., U.K.
3. Comparison of Step Length Estimation Algorithms for On-Foot Navigation Using a Low-Cost MEMS Sensor: S.H. Shin, C.G. Park, Seoul National University, South Korea

1. An Improved Sensor Level Integrity Algorithm for GPS/INS Integrated System: U.I. Bhatti, Imperial College London, U.K.
2. New Applications of Measurement Redundancy in High Performance Relative Navigation Systems for Aviation: S. Khanafseh, B. Kempny, B. Pervan, Illinois Institute of Technology
3. Combining Inertial Navigation System With GPS Precise Point Positioning: Flight Test Results: A.Q. Le, J. Lorga, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
4. Architectures for Combined Standard Positioning System/Precise Positioning System User Equipment : D.A. Stratton; Rockwell Collins, Inc.
5. Wind Estimation and Airspeed Calibration Using the UAV with a Single-Antenna GNSS Receiver and Airspeed Sensor: A. Cho, J. Kim, S. Lee, C. Kee, Seoul National University, South Korea
6. Ionospheric Code Delay Estimation in a Single Frequency Case for Civil Aviation: C. Ouzeau, ENAC/TeSA, France; F. Bastide, Sofreavia/DTI, France: C. Macabiau, ENAC, France; B. Roturier, DSNA-DTI, France
7. Alert Limits: Do we Need Them for CAT III?: Deriving GBAS Requirements for Consistency with CAT III Operations: B. Clark, B. DeCleene, Federal Aviation Administration